Rallyart JDM Front
Dec 11, 2003, 10:17 PM
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rallyart JDM Front
What do you guys think of the JDM front bumper.
You notice that the front doesn't slant foreward but cuts flat. I know that its for safety reasons that the US model sticks out but man. Screw a new bodykit, JDM style looks fine for me, just needs a lip though.
Oh, by the way, if the LRA ran a 1/4 Mile time of 14.9 sec on the MT rag then it runs quicker 1/4 Mile then a U.S. Type R heheheh. Oh and them Temple of VTEC videos show the JDM 210HP 1994-2001 Integra Type R running their 1/4 Mile at 15.1 and the JDM 185HP 1996-2001 Civic Type R at 15.6. I see that someone on this forum ran their LRA at 15.4. I can believe that the LRA can run those numbers.
seems to underrate their numbers on their cars quite often. Its obvious that did extensive testing with gear ratios when they mated this engine and tranny together. I bet though that the engine suffers on the top end. Oh and the compression on this motor is like 9.5.1 compared to the Honda Motors at 10.8.1. I wonder how this motor would do with similiar or higher compression numbers.
You notice that the front doesn't slant foreward but cuts flat. I know that its for safety reasons that the US model sticks out but man. Screw a new bodykit, JDM style looks fine for me, just needs a lip though.
Oh, by the way, if the LRA ran a 1/4 Mile time of 14.9 sec on the MT rag then it runs quicker 1/4 Mile then a U.S. Type R heheheh. Oh and them Temple of VTEC videos show the JDM 210HP 1994-2001 Integra Type R running their 1/4 Mile at 15.1 and the JDM 185HP 1996-2001 Civic Type R at 15.6. I see that someone on this forum ran their LRA at 15.4. I can believe that the LRA can run those numbers.
seems to underrate their numbers on their cars quite often. Its obvious that did extensive testing with gear ratios when they mated this engine and tranny together. I bet though that the engine suffers on the top end. Oh and the compression on this motor is like 9.5.1 compared to the Honda Motors at 10.8.1. I wonder how this motor would do with similiar or higher compression numbers.
Last edited by XRS; Dec 13, 2003 at 11:43 AM.
Dec 12, 2003, 11:15 AM
#2
Evolved Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the front end.
But I still plan on getting a CF hood as soon as they're available with eyelids to match the car and a front lip when those are out as well. I plan to dress my RA up
But I still plan on getting a CF hood as soon as they're available with eyelids to match the car and a front lip when those are out as well. I plan to dress my RA up
Can't wait till carbon hood are out for our cars 
Trending Topics
Dec 15, 2003, 11:56 AM
#9
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Sigh" people, read the posts slower please. This is the second time I've had to explain my posts. I SAID:
Oh, by the way, IF the LRA ran a 1/4 Mile time of 14.9 sec on the MT rag then it runs quicker 1/4 Mile then a U.S. Type R heheheh.
Does this clarify it now?
Dec 15, 2003, 12:01 PM
#10
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Orlando, FL (Sucklando)
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maybe im not familiar enough with the ralliart's front end but i honestly see no difference between that and the ra front end. well im in the middle of an exam so i think ill get back to it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post