Notices
ECU Flash

open loop load?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2008, 07:17 PM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Smike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Posts: 9,002
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Intersting...unfortunately the VIIIs cells go from

3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
2.5
1.79688
1.81641
1.81641
1.77734
1.73828
1.73828
1.69922

500-6000 there. But we did not get the IX's scaling. Anyone know the conversions? In the MPG mod thread it still is looking like the IXs have something else in the coding that allows for leaning out a section of cells (aka MPG). Just doesnt work with the 8s.
Old Jan 5, 2008, 07:25 PM
  #32  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
nothere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bellevue. WA
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hope I can clarify what is going on here, ie I hope I understand it.

lemmonhead is making the crossover map more secure at basically stock conditions, while others are looking at changing general cruise into open loop.



two different goals

smikeevo;
looks like an 8 could just alter the change over location via load. or with the tps value by making the voltage drop happen where you want the change to be?

I think setting up for cruise makes sense in the load map anyway.

Last edited by nothere; Jan 5, 2008 at 07:46 PM.
Old Jan 6, 2008, 06:46 AM
  #33  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
juyanith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SmikeEvo
Intersting...unfortunately the VIIIs cells go from

3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
3.00781
2.5
1.79688
1.81641
1.81641
1.77734
1.73828
1.73828
1.69922

500-6000 there. But we did not get the IX's scaling. Anyone know the conversions? In the MPG mod thread it still is looking like the IXs have something else in the coding that allows for leaning out a section of cells (aka MPG). Just doesnt work with the 8s.
I'm not sure what you're saying doesn't work on the VIII. I have an '03 and adjusted the open loop load for mileage and it is working just fine. The chart you posted above looks like my "Open Loop Throttle High Load" table, but it runs 500-7500. I have not modified that table only the load-based ones.
Old Jan 6, 2008, 07:23 AM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Smike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Posts: 9,002
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
I was comparing the VIII TPS scaling to the IX. The 8s use voltage (correct?) were as the IXs seem to use TPS sensor readings.

My scaling is a bit different. But I also have an 05. Looking at some of my 04 maps I see the scaling you have.

Mine:
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4250
4500
4750
5000
5250
5500
5750
6000

Interesting. I drive 500mi (freeway) week and I still only see 23-24 MPG (pre or post mod).
Old Jan 6, 2008, 09:00 AM
  #35  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
juyanith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The table is listed in volts, but I've never checked it myself. It is interesting that the scale is different but it shouldn't really matter for MPG since you're going to be below 4000 RPM anyway. Just so I understand, you have changed your open loop load to something under the load you see at cruise, but it doesn't switch to open loop? (I have set mine to 30 in the 2000-3500 RPM range.)
Old Jan 6, 2008, 11:12 AM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Smike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Posts: 9,002
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Correct. I have my open loads at 45 right now. Interesting you went lower. I think I am going to adjust mine lower. But from the logs it looked like I was in open loop.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 07:30 AM
  #37  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
juyanith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The part that confuses me is that you saw no change in mileage at all. My AFRs are not rock-steady for the whole cruise, but mileage definitely improved. What I found was that my loads easily varied from 30-80 even with very smooth throttle input which is why I set Open Loop Load down to 30.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 12:49 PM
  #38  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Smike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere testing various tires, brakes, and suspensions.
Posts: 9,002
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by juyanith
The part that confuses me is that you saw no change in mileage at all. My AFRs are not rock-steady for the whole cruise, but mileage definitely improved. What I found was that my loads easily varied from 30-80 even with very smooth throttle input which is why I set Open Loop Load down to 30.
I think I have it now. I looked at my logs again and I had that same variation. I changed the OPL to 30 also (31 was my lowest number - ave was 40-45 but it would dip here and there). So far I have 180 and Im not even at half tank. Hit 90 at the 3/4 mark. I think 40 OPL was not low enough. I should have this tank down tomorrow - Ill do the MPG then.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 01:33 PM
  #39  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Why does lowering the open loop load improve gas mileage? I would think that it would do the opposite.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 01:52 PM
  #40  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
juyanith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrfred
Why does lowering the open loop load improve gas mileage? I would think that it would do the opposite.
It doesn't in and of itself but once you get the car running open loop at cruise you can run it leaner. There are other threads talking about this in more detail, but as long as you don't have a cat you can run ~15.5 AFR at cruise.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 03:09 PM
  #41  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by juyanith
It doesn't in and of itself but once you get the car running open loop at cruise you can run it leaner. There are other threads talking about this in more detail, but as long as you don't have a cat you can run ~15.5 AFR at cruise.
ok. Got it. I was wondering if that would be the case. My guess is that the table values don't match up with actual afr at these lean settings, so its necessary to tune this regime with a wideband as well?
Old Jan 7, 2008, 03:10 PM
  #42  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Has anyone found the flag that indicates open or closed loop operation? Would be nice to be able to log that.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 03:40 PM
  #43  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
nothere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bellevue. WA
Posts: 2,680
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
mrfred,

yeah I would really think it would be wise to use a wideband. I don't see how the fuel map could be counted on to be correct out of the box. Although it looks like some have had numbers match.

JB could log his wideband and see by how steady his graph was when he was in open loop.

meanwhile, I have to ask: what difference does it make if you have a cat? The cat doesn't seem to mind when you are in open loop at high load. Why would low load open loop make a difference?
Old Jan 7, 2008, 08:15 PM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Jorge T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mrfred
Has anyone found the flag that indicates open or closed loop operation? Would be nice to be able to log that.
STFT (02 sensor) goes flat(0) when ECU changes to open loop.
Old Jan 7, 2008, 08:34 PM
  #45  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by Jorge T
STFT (02 sensor) goes flat(0) when ECU changes to open loop.
Yep, I knew that. Thought it would be nice to find the flag though.


Quick Reply: open loop load?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:27 PM.