How To Tune an Evo
Dec 24, 2011, 07:21 AM
#753
Newbie
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: pa
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow!!! thanks for posting this! Helped me out a lot! I will be going speed density soon and now with this write up i have no fear that i will be able to tune it myself...i will also be rereading it 100 times hahaha
Jan 18, 2012, 05:48 PM
#754
Newbie
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this stuff is sooooooo confusing, i cant learn this way for some reason, i feel like i got to be there and see someone do it infront of me, over and over before i try it myself
Jan 29, 2012, 12:15 AM
#757
Well basically I just need a map to safely start and drive my car home from the shop, any ideas? I can post my mod list help would be appreciated, I can tune a stock , stockish evo but now since the car will have bigger injectors etc. e85 im not sure how to start off and get my foot in the door.
-Pat
-Pat
Feb 27, 2012, 08:53 AM
#758
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what all cables and software do I need?? In the first thread it says that Tactrix does not log, but the site says it does which is true??
What software is the best to use? Tactrix is also out of stock (figures when I just got a new laptop for this) I am sure this has been asked but 51 pages is a lot to read through. Thanks.
What software is the best to use? Tactrix is also out of stock (figures when I just got a new laptop for this) I am sure this has been asked but 51 pages is a lot to read through. Thanks.
Last edited by 4g63Boostjunkie; Feb 27, 2012 at 08:56 AM.
Jun 24, 2012, 10:19 AM
#764
Newbie
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chichester
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AFR of 14.7:1 is the stoichiometric ideal value, I get that.
Surely an AFR of 12.5:1 is richer and not leaner as there is now less air and consequently more fuel to the ratio of air?
Surely an AFR of 16:1 is leaner and not richer as there is now more air and consequently less fuel to the ratio of air?
Surely an AFR of 12.5:1 is richer and not leaner as there is now less air and consequently more fuel to the ratio of air?
Surely an AFR of 16:1 is leaner and not richer as there is now more air and consequently less fuel to the ratio of air?
Jun 24, 2012, 10:39 AM
#765
AFR of 14.7:1 is the stoichiometric ideal value, I get that.
Surely an AFR of 12.5:1 is richer and not leaner as there is now less air and consequently more fuel to the ratio of air?
Surely an AFR of 16:1 is leaner and not richer as there is now more air and consequently less fuel to the ratio of air?
Surely an AFR of 12.5:1 is richer and not leaner as there is now less air and consequently more fuel to the ratio of air?
Surely an AFR of 16:1 is leaner and not richer as there is now more air and consequently less fuel to the ratio of air?
