Highest whp on stock ECU
Mar 17, 2008, 04:13 PM
#32
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Annandale, NJ
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mar 19, 2008, 03:47 PM
#34
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Annandale, NJ
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mar 19, 2008, 03:50 PM
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i made 537 on 27 psi.. dynojet pump/meth... stock Intake/block/head..
recently made 570 on a mustang dyno on c16/pump mix with no more tuning just upped boost.. im sure it would do more
recently made 570 on a mustang dyno on c16/pump mix with no more tuning just upped boost.. im sure it would do more
Mar 19, 2008, 04:11 PM
#36
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Annandale, NJ
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd be happy with 570, hopefully over 500tq with the stroker and @ full song earlier...
If you have a dyno sheet post it please, thanks.
Last edited by Duby; Mar 19, 2008 at 04:13 PM. Reason: wanted to add more with out another post
Mar 19, 2008, 05:21 PM
#39
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fuquay-Varina, NC
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had to epoxy mine as well...
this was done on a mix of c16/93 still spraying meth... STOCK intake manifold/Ecu/block/head.... car is tuned for 93/meth at 27psi... no tuning was done... just added some c16 and turned the boost up.. on a mustang dyno... For some reason the graph and the computer read 568 and 566...prolly coulda cracked around 580 maybe 600 but i didnt wanna push it.. You can see on the graph the AFR is in the grey line and it was all over the place... we didnt tune it at all... it was a dyno day and we were just kinda showin off
this was done on a mix of c16/93 still spraying meth... STOCK intake manifold/Ecu/block/head.... car is tuned for 93/meth at 27psi... no tuning was done... just added some c16 and turned the boost up.. on a mustang dyno... For some reason the graph and the computer read 568 and 566...prolly coulda cracked around 580 maybe 600 but i didnt wanna push it.. You can see on the graph the AFR is in the grey line and it was all over the place... we didnt tune it at all... it was a dyno day and we were just kinda showin off
Last edited by E VOL IX; Mar 19, 2008 at 05:24 PM.
Mar 24, 2008, 11:07 PM
#40
Well I am not going to set records with my little old Green, but I now have a running MAFT Pro equipped car. With something like that working in conjunction with the stock ECU, I dont see why you would face a "limit". I can completely adjust where the car is in the load scale range, what the max load reached at a given level is gonna be, trim the fuel if needed, and then make all the normal adjustments in ECUflash to actually tune the car.
Mar 24, 2008, 11:42 PM
#41
:
Mar 25, 2008, 05:17 AM
#42
Well I am not going to set records with my little old Green, but I now have a running MAFT Pro equipped car. With something like that working in conjunction with the stock ECU, I dont see why you would face a "limit". I can completely adjust where the car is in the load scale range, what the max load reached at a given level is gonna be, trim the fuel if needed, and then make all the normal adjustments in ECUflash to actually tune the car.
It's something I'm considering in the future, especially to have the benefit of an IAT sensor.
Mar 25, 2008, 04:43 PM
#43
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
no dyno around here unfortunately (6 hours away)
DLL for what it's worth:
93 octane 30psi stock ecu stock mas, I'm hoping for well over 600 when I do the built engine and race gas.
DLL for what it's worth:
93 octane 30psi stock ecu stock mas, I'm hoping for well over 600 when I do the built engine and race gas.
