Notices
ECU Flash

Serious timing issue 88580714 V7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2014, 02:39 PM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
foxbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 926
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Serious timing issue 88580714 V7

This is my first time using the 88580714 V7 & I encountered a serious issue with ignition timing. I used it to tune a JDM E9 RS with a GT ECU (not the car's original ECU).
I kept getting knock counts around 6000-7000 rpm 250-260 load. Naturally, I kept reducing timing until timing figures became very low for the amount of load & gas used (93). Then I noticed that timing figures logged are actually much higher than the actual, corresponding cells in the timing table! As an example, the logged number at 7000rpm 250load is 10 while the number for 7000/250 in the table is 6!. Also, judging by the same log file, it seems that low oct timing isn't kicking in when knock is encountered! Low oct timing is at least 3 degrees lower than the main table.

Is it possible that my logged load numbers are off? Or perhaps the GT ECU doesn't like this rom version?
Before I started tuning I had to change mut00 & mut01 to 6b22 and 6b23 to be able to log load 2byte.

One more issue, I couldn't get launch control rev limit to work, the normal rev limit is 7606 default, I set stationery rev limit to 5500 but it didn't work!

I'd appreciate your feedback regarding the above issues.
Attached Thumbnails Serious timing issue 88580714 V7-timing.jpg  
Attached Images  

Last edited by foxbat; Nov 15, 2014 at 05:59 PM. Reason: adding attachments
Old Nov 15, 2014, 03:46 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Tuxevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 569
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Does your 2byte to 1byte load conversion in ecuflash and evoscan match up? IE, 1.2 and 1.2 or 1.4 and 1.4
Old Nov 15, 2014, 05:57 PM
  #3  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
foxbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 926
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by Tuxevo
Does your 2byte to 1byte load conversion in ecuflash and evoscan match up? IE, 1.2 and 1.2 or 1.4 and 1.4
Well, I'm actually logging load 2byte, load 1byte is not even working. I don't think I have to worry about the conversion when logging 2byte... correct?
Anyway the 2byte to 1byte factor in ecuflash is 1.2 (default)
1byte eval in evoscan is 1.2 also (default)
2byte eval is 0.3125 (default)
Old Nov 15, 2014, 06:31 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Tuxevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 569
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
I've never used the 8858 rom, but I was under the impression that all V7 roms used 1byte load as a reference as the representative value in the tables. If that is the case, I would think the first order of business is to be able to accurately log 1byte.
Old May 6, 2015, 12:19 PM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
10isace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East of the Rockies
Posts: 1,048
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Revive
Foxbat, did you ever get 1 byte or 2 byte load to log with the 8858 rom? I'm having trouble too. Neither one logs anything. MUT table appears to be correct, so I'm not sure what it is.

1 Byte Load = 840B at MUT41
2 Byte Load = 6B22 at MUT00 and 6B23 at MUT01

I'm going to try 8450 and 8451 for 2 byte load at MUT00 and MUT01 as that's what I have in the 8859, but I think that's the stock addresses. IDK, haven't used 2 byte load in awhile.
Old May 7, 2015, 09:36 AM
  #6  
Evolving Member
 
german_evoVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wiesbaden, germany
Posts: 184
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
I am running these roms more often, because we have some Race Cars here which using that version.

Load Logging:
2 Byte Load = 6B22 at MUT00 and 6B23 at MUT01 are correct, but are the uncompensated load.

So, as long as the turbo is inside the Efficiency Map, the Load will be app. The Boost in Kpa ( Absolute ) minus round about 10 to 15 Load ( Example: 26psi are 1.8 Bars or 280Kpa --> Load is 260- 270 in the medium RPM Range )

In High Rpm situations ( High Airflow ) it can happen that the "normal" load tapers to 210, but the comp load will be lower than that like 180 - 190 while still running 21psi aka 1.5 Bars aka 250Kpa. You see that the difference is about 40 load instead of 15 and the compensated is even lower...

If you get outside the Eff. Range of the Turbo, the Air Mass will go down, but the Boost could be stable. Same applies if you are getting a slight Vacuum inside the MAF.

Ignition timing will be calculated by "compensated Load"

As far as i know that will be 2byte load comp:
MUT 00 = 6B28
MUT 01 = 6B29
but not sure about that...

For the Rev limiter
Almost any JDM 9 RS has the Top Clutch switch installed, but is missing the wiring to ground an the ECU.., So there is no connector at the switch.
The only switch which is installed an wired ist the Lower one for the Engine Start - Clutch Breaker...

You have to wire it in for function of the NLTS, Rev Limit and Launch Maps

Steffen
Old May 7, 2015, 10:59 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Evo IX and earlier use 3 forms of 2 byte load -

Raw load
Load + baro
Load + baro + IAT 75*+

If you have correlations issues between your load value you log and the value that the car runs there is a good chance its this messing with you.
Old May 7, 2015, 08:47 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
foxbat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UAE
Posts: 926
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
That was a while ago, I had load 2byte working but the readings were off as I explained in my first post. If the reason is what JB mentioned then I wonder how to fix it? Is it by logging 2byte load comp, as German Evo mentioned?
The missing clutch wiring must be reason causing the rev limit not to work, although I have to mention that the rev limit was previously working fine on the same car when using an older v5.1 rom!
Old May 10, 2015, 05:12 AM
  #9  
Evolving Member
 
german_evoVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wiesbaden, germany
Posts: 184
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Clutch switch was not required for the v5.1, but it is for V7 ...

I also had that problem when converting from an 5.1 to 7 Rom

Reason is the Launch control AND NLTS...

Try to log the comp Load and see if that correlates to the Timing map values...
Old May 12, 2015, 02:41 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
10isace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East of the Rockies
Posts: 1,048
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Thanks guys!!!

I was waiting until I could figure it out to reply. AUDM Evo IX running SD. Using the SpoolinUp EDM/JDM SD harness. Was trying to log load using the Baro hooked up to the map sensor with Baro at pin 51 IIRC. Changed the read baro ADC and change the request id in evoscan. Still no luck that way, so just switch the baro pin to 92 and all is good.

What do you Aussies use for SD in terms of wiring the map sensor? Anyone try the SpoolinUp SD harness going through the Baro pin? Just courious what needs to be changed in MUT table. Thanks!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
YaroRS
ECU Flash
8
Dec 3, 2012 09:11 PM
kassir
ECU Flash
11
Nov 5, 2011 01:16 AM
W2J
ECU Flash
1
Feb 10, 2011 12:41 AM
Yorl8
ECU Flash
1
Jun 13, 2010 12:12 AM



Quick Reply: Serious timing issue 88580714 V7



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 AM.