18bora

iTrader: (8)

Mods:
Walbro Fuel pump
Presision 100
Vishnu 3” V-band TBE
Megan 02 Housing
Busher’s ported exhaust manifold
ETS 3” FMIC
ETS LICP
Injen intake/UICP
Forge MBC @ 27-28 psi peak PSI tapering to 24-25
93 Pump gas
Virtual Dyno factors:
Flat/straight back road
3rd gear pull
25” tall tires - 255/40/17
Driver 220lbs
Trunk full of tool (at least 120lbs if not more), just finished a clutch job; full tool box, hammers, pry bars, impact wrenches, etc…

Dynojet:


Virtual Dyno:


Logs from all 3 pulls:


Road course @ 22-24 PSI

TeKiZeRo

iTrader: (25)

Nice power. You have some consistent knock on the top end there.

fightex

iTrader: (15)

+1 on the knock, the ecu is pulling timing. this is on stock cams too? i bet theres another 20whp+ from just swapping to some GSCs

InitialE

iTrader: (5)

The response is almost identical to my stock 9 turbo, except that the torque and whp keep going up and up..... very nice! Thanks for posting!

still*boostn

iTrader: (15)

HOLY KNOCK! 5 and 8 counts,....?

nice numbers, but get this tuned out and youll definatley put some more power.

G20

iTrader: (13)

400 on 93 is good. the timings are starting out on the high side for this amount of boost. how u do that? how come you didn't log load?

R/TErnie

iTrader: (32)

Retard your mivec in the knock prone areas.... Then retune without knock by pulling timing

Boosted Tuning

iTrader: (12)

Your logs need more resolution. Log less items.

mt057

iTrader: (6)

WOW! 9* timing at peak torque... This is on 93 oct? I know it says it is but wow...

The only other thing that I have noticed is with the VD graph. Do you see how the power drops off at about 7400 on the VD and on the DJ graph it continues out to about 7800 before falling off? I have noticed the same thing at the end of some of my runs. I have did not get this with the old version of the software. I have screens pics of two diff. graphs one from the old program one from the new. Both are of the same runs. With the new version, near the end of my run the power just drops. This was not the same as the graph made by the old version of the software or my most recent DJ run.

bbarnhill

iTrader: (1)

Nice to see Virtual Dyno getting used. Hope you enjoy it.

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

same thing i noticed with 3 people not including myself with virtual dyno vs iveytune dyno.. numbers are all but dead on.. road pulls vs dyno.. and people are trying to say this things not accurate.

when used properly on flat/level/non bumpy road these things are dead on. i wouldn't be risking a 25K in mods setup if i had doubts about it.

CMB

iTrader: (5)

The VD is close but not dead on, even in this lower HP example. Look at peak TQ on the DJ is at 4k even and on the VD is at 4600 rpm. Thats pretty off. The trail end is always off as well as noted by mt507. I am not bashing just saying its not "dead on".

To the OP, was this to show how close the readings are? or something else? BTW I like your risk tolerence on the 9* at peak TQ!

CMB

iTrader: (5)

Actually looking at your tune you need a little refinement to cure that knock. Gotta get that 3'' IC outta there and that will help that knock up top too..

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

As long as the program shows gains and losses properly its as good as a regular dyno. From my experience I can find best timing pretty easy with this program if its on a flat road. It shows hp/torque increases just like a regular dyno throughout the rpm range as i sweep the maps.

CMB

iTrader: (5)

I feel the same way and thats how I use it. Its perfect for back to back changes and such. Kudos to their creators..but my arguement still stands