Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Hydraulic vs solid lifters

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 16, 2007, 04:41 AM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
gt42r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Markopoulo, Greece
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hydraulic vs solid lifters

I know it has been discussed again but I would like to here the pros' opinion on this subject.In Europe many tuners use solid lifters on their 4G63s and they say they are working fine.But others (including Buschur and AMS) say that solid lifters simple don't work on our engines.
From my personal experience with the BLE solids one thing I can tell is that it is almost impossible to adjust them properly.What do you guys thing?
It would be very helpfull to have well none tuners like Buschur and AMS to explain us whats wrong with the solids and finally if they worth it or not.
Old May 16, 2007, 08:56 AM
  #2  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
gt42r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Markopoulo, Greece
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bump!Any interest at all?
Old May 16, 2007, 09:07 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Noogles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: So. Cal (LA County)
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used the BLE solids on my motor for a few dyno pulls.
1) They are very hard to adjust once installed. to se the lash you have to pull the cams.
2) the tolerances where way off
3)I broke 2 Jam nuts off while trying to loosen then when first pulled them out of the package
4) they are noisy as hell, you think a lifter tapping is bad how about 16 of the clanking at idle
5) there is no use unless you are running a Piper Drag Cam with so much lift and such an aggressive lobe that it collapses lifters, but at the point the car isn't street driven and is probably inspected after each race weekend.
Old May 16, 2007, 10:03 AM
  #4  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
Ted B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,332
Received 57 Likes on 44 Posts
Agreed, there is no reason to use solid lifters for these engines unless it's a situation where they are absolutely necessary. They create far more problems than they solve, especially when there is no problem to solve in the first place.
Old May 16, 2007, 04:32 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
gt42r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Markopoulo, Greece
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the interest guys.I hope more people join this thread with their opinions!
Old May 16, 2007, 10:27 PM
  #6  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ZyBeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somewhere on the Planet
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've tested BLE and they really SUCK!

If you have to use solid lifters go with JUN, they are much easier to adjust. They use shims.
There is a Mitsubishi tool that can be used to compress the valve springs so you can adjust the lifters with out pulling the cams. It's very expensive and I don't know if there are any other tools for it out there?
Old May 17, 2007, 08:31 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Noogles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: So. Cal (LA County)
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another option is what i will be running with my Piper cams....

A gutted stock lifter that is machined to fit a Ecotec solid lifter inside that is shimmed up to the proper lash.

The Ecoteck lifters have spun 10k rpm on the dyno no problew..... only PITA is making machining the shims.
Old May 17, 2007, 08:35 AM
  #8  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
gt42r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Markopoulo, Greece
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats very interesting.Does the head of the GM solid lifter fits with our rocker arm?
Old May 17, 2007, 09:31 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Noogles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: So. Cal (LA County)
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it does...... Once i get my car running i might go into production.
Old May 21, 2007, 04:49 PM
  #10  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
gt42r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Markopoulo, Greece
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any other thoughts on this subject guys?
Old May 21, 2007, 05:09 PM
  #11  
Newbie
 
Spoolin Spyder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just wait till the 4b11 hits, doing cams will become so much more work, tappets are no fun.
Old May 21, 2007, 05:39 PM
  #12  
Newbie
 
NoisyTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: East Side
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only reason to run solid lifter if you run very high rpm and or a very nasty cam.
Old May 16, 2008, 12:13 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
wevo1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kingston,ny
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i tried the ble lifters and 2 came apart in my car after about 45 miles. i also noticed 1 had cracked. tried to get my money back but cant and im still waiting for replacements after 5 months
Old Aug 29, 2008, 12:25 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
EVOkitTeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was considering doing the solid lifters in my VIII but thanks for the posts, definitely made me re-think that choice.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
motoxxx55
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
11
Jun 11, 2009 12:44 AM
RUN FOREST RUN
Evo How Tos / Installations
2
Feb 12, 2008 07:46 PM
TTOPPOUZI
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
9
Feb 6, 2007 06:25 AM
TTOPPOUZI
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
16
Jan 16, 2007 04:59 PM
dryad001
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Mar 7, 2005 05:42 PM



Quick Reply: Hydraulic vs solid lifters



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:17 PM.