evo 4g64 with 20g turbo
Apr 29, 2009, 02:03 AM
#1
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
evo 4g64 with 20g turbo
hey guys , im from australia here and i have an evo 6 and im just about to get my rebuilt 4g64/63 motor......i was wondering if u guys have any dyno results from a 2.3/2.4l with a evo 9 20g turbo.......reason for this is here in australia no one has really done the 4g64 block with 63 head and i dont know what to expect.....like spool and and power difference from the 2.0l i had.......so im hoping to see some comparisan dyno graphs from 2.0 to 2.4l......thanx in advance
Apr 29, 2009, 01:47 PM
#4
I have driven 100 different turbo setups on 4g63. I owned a 2.3/20g setup for 9 months. was the most fun I have had with 4g63. Bigger is not better for everyone. if you put a lot of driving and you like fast spooling , hard hitting turbo, this setup will be very satisfying. Only reason I changed the setup was it was too hard on the early transmissions. nothing like being in traffic and doing lane changes with the front end lifting up. They think you are spraying nitrous.
it isnt a high revving setup. expect mounds of torque from 4000-7000
it isnt a high revving setup. expect mounds of torque from 4000-7000
Apr 29, 2009, 02:24 PM
#5
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: australia
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have driven 100 different turbo setups on 4g63. I owned a 2.3/20g setup for 9 months. was the most fun I have had with 4g63. Bigger is not better for everyone. if you put a lot of driving and you like fast spooling , hard hitting turbo, this setup will be very satisfying. Only reason I changed the setup was it was too hard on the early transmissions. nothing like being in traffic and doing lane changes with the front end lifting up. They think you are spraying nitrous.
it isnt a high revving setup. expect mounds of torque from 4000-7000
it isnt a high revving setup. expect mounds of torque from 4000-7000
Apr 29, 2009, 02:25 PM
#6
I have driven 100 different turbo setups on 4g63. I owned a 2.3/20g setup for 9 months. was the most fun I have had with 4g63. Bigger is not better for everyone. if you put a lot of driving and you like fast spooling , hard hitting turbo, this setup will be very satisfying. Only reason I changed the setup was it was too hard on the early transmissions. nothing like being in traffic and doing lane changes with the front end lifting up. They think you are spraying nitrous.
it isnt a high revving setup. expect mounds of torque from 4000-7000
it isnt a high revving setup. expect mounds of torque from 4000-7000
Trending Topics
May 2, 2009, 07:53 AM
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Thornton CO
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
typical straight line dyno queen highway pull fanboys. he didnt ask for your opinions on turbo choice. and the green IS a 20G lol 20G-5 vs the previous 20G-6 from tc.com. but hey no one uses 20G's right?
to the OP, search for stroked greens.
to the OP, search for stroked greens.
