Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

FP RED 64mm VS 80mm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2009, 09:38 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
ilikeppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FP RED 64mm VS 80mm

So i was wondering what the advantages and disadvantages are between the two inlet housings does the 80 provide more hp the the 64? thanks
Old Sep 23, 2009, 11:39 PM
  #2  
Newbie
 
evoluvinevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: central nj/tampa fl
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
plenty of threads on this. obviously the larger inlet would allow more air flow so that translate to more power. the larger compressor also helps the bucking high gear/low rpm issue the 64 has.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 12:19 AM
  #3  
Newbie
 
Spoolin' By U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually the 80mm opening is not an inlet it is just a surge port.
So instead of having just the 64mm compressor inlet, this additional
surge port around the inlet greatly reduces the air turbulence
and overall surge conditions which can occur with higher lbs per min.
airflow turbochargers. But this does not increase overall HP and TQ values,
it just allows for a wider and yet more efficent usable power range.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 08:56 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
FL_SilverEvo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 1,139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spoolin' By U
Actually the 80mm opening is not an inlet it is just a surge port.
So instead of having just the 64mm compressor inlet, this additional
surge port around the inlet greatly reduces the air turbulence
and overall surge conditions which can occur with higher lbs per min.
airflow turbochargers. But this does not increase overall HP and TQ values,
it just allows for a wider and yet more efficent usable power range.
Well said
Old Sep 24, 2009, 09:34 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
ROGERV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well maybe it was just my car but I gained hp on the top end. 15-30whp from 7-8k. The peak #'s stayed around the same but the topend was greatly increased.

Right after I installed the 80mm housing my original tune leaned out, So I knew it was flowing more air.

I was running 1psi more but it was 96deg. compared to 77deg.

I will post more info later....I am at work right now.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 09:51 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (78)
 
RockmanX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
i really DONT think the 80mm will give you more hp seriously lol why would they even offer the 64mm still. I heard read/told its strictly for surging purpose. not for that and you will gain more power. im pretty sure roger it was due to you retuning and turning up boost.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:10 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
RyuEvoIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Based on what I have seen from various dyno charts the 80mm cover hurts initial spool up and does not seem to have any noticeable gains in the upper rpm range. If it helps surging that's good but I experience no surging at all with my 64mm cover.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:23 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (78)
 
RockmanX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
yea seriously i was told the port it and will solve the surging issues maybe its just selected turbos.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:32 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
ROGERV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 80mm housing did seem to hurt initial spoolup but made up for it on the top end. The only thing that was changed from the orig. tune was a/f , timing was left the same. We had to add more fuel because the new housing made it run lean.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:39 AM
  #10  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Posts: 3,043
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
rodgerv - was the only swap the turbo when you experienced these gains?

intake pipe / air filter remained the same?

if so, thats a pretty big spread between turbo to turbo....

generally anti surge ported turbos loose a bit of flow compared to a non-surge ported housing, but you also loose the surge condition....so you give to get.

Consider yourself lucky, you got the best of both worlds!!

rodgerv - was your 64mm housing red an early issue turbo?
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:44 AM
  #11  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (51)
 
ROGERV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aby@MIL.SPEC
rodgerv - was the only swap the turbo when you experienced these gains?

intake pipe / air filter remained the same?

if so, thats a pretty big spread between turbo to turbo....

generally anti surge ported turbos loose a bit of flow compared to a non-surge ported housing, but you also loose the surge condition....so you give to get.

Consider yourself lucky, you got the best of both worlds!!

rodgerv - was your 64mm housing red an early issue turbo?
I had to change to the new 80mm intake pipe...maybe that also helped with the airflow. I was running the stock intake tube with the 64mm red.

The orig. buyer of the turbo bought it in Nov.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 10:49 AM
  #12  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Posts: 3,043
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by ROGERV
I had to change to the new 80mm intake pipe...maybe that also helped with the airflow. I was running the stock intake tube with the 64mm red..
I believe this had a large effect for your power gains
Old Sep 24, 2009, 11:13 AM
  #13  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
97TSiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ROGERV
I had to change to the new 80mm intake pipe...maybe that also helped with the airflow. I was running the stock intake tube with the 64mm red.
The larger 80mm intake would also account for the leaner condition as it will cause the MAF readings to change.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 11:14 AM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
97TSiAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Plymouth, MI
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spoolin' By U
Actually the 80mm opening is not an inlet it is just a surge port.
So instead of having just the 64mm compressor inlet, this additional
surge port around the inlet greatly reduces the air turbulence
and overall surge conditions which can occur with higher lbs per min.
airflow turbochargers. But this does not increase overall HP and TQ values,
it just allows for a wider and yet more efficent usable power range.
Quoting this again since this fully answers the OP's question.
Old Sep 24, 2009, 05:14 PM
  #15  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
 
ilikeppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks guys this really helps me understand the difference between the two. Is there any way to put the 80mm housing on the 64mm?


Quick Reply: FP RED 64mm VS 80mm



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:22 PM.