Wiseco ring gap
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: atene
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wiseco ring gap
Hello guys,
I have a problem with the gap of second ring.The gap of the second ring is 0.60mm/0,024 inches.I wrote to Wiseco Customer Service and they told me that gap is ok,but for my tuner is not ok.
Which is your suggestions and What do you think?
Thanks for your reply
I have a problem with the gap of second ring.The gap of the second ring is 0.60mm/0,024 inches.I wrote to Wiseco Customer Service and they told me that gap is ok,but for my tuner is not ok.
Which is your suggestions and What do you think?
Thanks for your reply
Last edited by bluflash; Oct 16, 2014 at 10:30 AM.
#3
Evolved Member
iTrader: (71)
On standard bore Wiseco pistons and a ptw clearance of .004, my untouched rings had a gap of .024" on top and .030" on 2nd. I just cleaned up the edges and went with it. Burns some oil and dual SM sealed catch cans take care of the blow-by very well. Better to have the rings loose than tight if you're going to run it hard. I'm also not a fan of a wider gap on the top ring, it lets compression gases sit in between the 2 rings rather than going to the crankcase where it's supposed to go.
Last edited by okevolutionVIII; Oct 16, 2014 at 05:34 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
When you do the specs following the wiseco sheet, they come out to larger on the bottom than the top as well. The info from wiseco does not make sense with the calculations they provide.
#10
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
I am the friend honda-guy is referring to. I run manley pistons not wiseco. On the Manley recomendations, they show the top ring gapped larger than the second ring. The top ring recommendation was around 0.018", which is tighter then most of the gaps I saw people recommending on this forum. I also saw many folks recommending the second ring gap larger than the top, so I dug further. I called Manley to discuss my specific setup, and they referred me to Total Seal.
I called Total Seal directly and talked to one of their engineers. The guy was very helpful and even explained why everyone that runs a larger second ring gap was wrong. I do not remember the exact details, but it was based on ring flutter and keeping pressure in the right places. Total Seal recommended for my application a top gap of 0.027" and a second ring gap of 0.024-0.026". I did not go quite that loose, but I kept the top ring 0.001-0.002" larger than the second ring.
I called Total Seal directly and talked to one of their engineers. The guy was very helpful and even explained why everyone that runs a larger second ring gap was wrong. I do not remember the exact details, but it was based on ring flutter and keeping pressure in the right places. Total Seal recommended for my application a top gap of 0.027" and a second ring gap of 0.024-0.026". I did not go quite that loose, but I kept the top ring 0.001-0.002" larger than the second ring.
#12
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: atene
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks guys for the answers .My goal is 550cv 2 bar pressure .I I think is a better gap closer .Top .018 bottom .022 I'm afraid of the blow by.Is correct?
With wiseco formula top .017 bottom .019
For example tomei says to keep a gap on second ring .016 because I think there are differences in expansion of the material.
With wiseco formula top .017 bottom .019
For example tomei says to keep a gap on second ring .016 because I think there are differences in expansion of the material.
Last edited by bluflash; Oct 18, 2014 at 04:05 AM.