Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2013 GSR, Boostin Performance tuned. Baseline to MHI 18k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 28, 2015, 10:47 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Prosdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 GSR, Boostin Performance tuned. Baseline to MHI 18k

I never got around to posting my dyno results from stock, to basic bolt-ons, to MHI 18k turbo. Going back in a few weeks for an E85 tune so I'll post those results when I get back.

Here they are. All tunes were done at the same shop, on the same dyno, with 93

Baseline (236/244)
Stock max boost level: 22 psi




Bolt-ons (304/312): ETS intake, UIP, HFC, DP, Grimmspeed EBCS,
Max Boost:26 psi




MHI-18k (352/326): 93 tune Built bottom end, MHI turbo, ETS FMIC, FIC 1100cc, 340lph FP
Max boost: 26 psi



MHI-18k (389/352) E85 tune
Max boost 29 psi

Last edited by Prosdoc; Jun 19, 2015 at 04:59 PM.
Old May 29, 2015, 12:41 AM
  #2  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
MR. EVO MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 1,761
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The numbers you have with the 18k on 93 are the same numbers guys run on stock turbo.

On my stock turbo MR I'm pushing more whp whtq then you are. I'm at 27psi
Old May 29, 2015, 04:24 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
splattj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Allendale, MI
Posts: 1,018
Received 113 Likes on 101 Posts
Originally Posted by MR. EVO MR
The numbers you have with the 18k on 93 are the same numbers guys run on stock turbo.

On my stock turbo MR I'm pushing more whp whtq then you are. I'm at 27psi
Are your numbers off a Mustang Dyno? If not, you're comparing apples and oranges.
An increase of 116hp and 82tq isn't bad for a very street-able turbo.

Out of curiosity, why an MHI 18K?
Old May 29, 2015, 04:50 AM
  #4  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Prosdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly. I also asked for a conservative tune.
I chose the MHI because of the good blend of features such as reliability, performance, and minimal lag compared to stock. This is my DD so my goal wasn't to build a high hp racetrack monster.

Originally Posted by splattj
Are your numbers off a Mustang Dyno? If not, you're comparing apples and oranges.
An increase of 116hp and 82tq isn't bad for a very street-able turbo.

Out of curiosity, why an MHI 18K?
Old May 29, 2015, 04:00 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Prosdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm just not sure if I need to upgrade the clutch or if my stock clutch will be ok at the new power level
Old Jun 2, 2015, 10:28 PM
  #6  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
MR. EVO MR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 1,761
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by splattj
Are your numbers off a Mustang Dyno? If not, you're comparing apples and oranges.
An increase of 116hp and 82tq isn't bad for a very street-able turbo.

Out of curiosity, why an MHI 18K?
Yes I was tuned in a mustang Dyno!
I'm at 350whp+ 370whtq
Old Jun 3, 2015, 04:24 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
splattj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Allendale, MI
Posts: 1,018
Received 113 Likes on 101 Posts
Originally Posted by MR. EVO MR
Yes I was tuned in a mustang Dyno!
I'm at 350whp+ 370whtq
Well, OP did ask for a conservative tune. Sounds like the 18K has some more power to be found.
Old Jun 3, 2015, 04:54 AM
  #8  
Evolving Member
 
formerSTIowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: rockford, il
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That does seem a bit low. I have a very similar set up (MHI, ETS, etc.) tuned by BP last summer and made 385/327 on 93 and 26 psi. See link below. Their mustang is very low reading and mine is not a DD but still considered a 'safe' tune.

If you have a built bottom end why go for such a conservative tune? I would think with a strong build even a completely maxed out MHI wouldn't be a huge risk.

Let us know how the E85 tune goes. I'm strongly considering E85 in the near future and it should put me over the 400 whp mark on their dyno.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...tin-tuned.html
Old Jun 3, 2015, 06:42 AM
  #9  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Prosdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm hoping to be over 400hp on their dyno when I go back for the E85 tune in 2 weeks. I asked for a conservative tune because I had a blown stock turbo/engine prior. I'd rather be safe than squeeze the last drop out at this point. I think you and I have taken a similar path... I used to have an 07 Sti on E85, open dump, stock turbo...putting down 377/350 on P&L dyno..

Originally Posted by formerSTIowner
That does seem a bit low. I have a very similar set up (MHI, ETS, etc.) tuned by BP last summer and made 385/327 on 93 and 26 psi. See link below. Their mustang is very low reading and mine is not a DD but still considered a 'safe' tune.

If you have a built bottom end why go for such a conservative tune? I would think with a strong build even a completely maxed out MHI wouldn't be a huge risk.

Let us know how the E85 tune goes. I'm strongly considering E85 in the near future and it should put me over the 400 whp mark on their dyno.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...tin-tuned.html
Old Jun 3, 2015, 07:18 AM
  #10  
Evolving Member
 
formerSTIowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: rockford, il
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gotcha. Did you get your build at BP too? I'm considering this over the winter and would be interested to know what direction you went. PM your number if you want to chat on it.
Old Jun 3, 2015, 07:21 AM
  #11  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Prosdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All mods, labor, and tunes were done at BP (along with the engine build). I'll be back there in 2 weeks for the new E85 tune. I PMed you my number.

Originally Posted by formerSTIowner
Gotcha. Did you get your build at BP too? I'm considering this over the winter and would be interested to know what direction you went. PM your number if you want to chat on it.
Old Jun 3, 2015, 06:59 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
evoxisking's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: ny
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's like 400 whp on a uncorrected dyno. Fun little setup for the street, and increased gas mileage cruising.
Old Jun 5, 2015, 01:55 PM
  #13  
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Prosdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just came across this thread...his gains, with a few more mods, look to net about the same as mine.

http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=217154
Old Jun 5, 2015, 03:33 PM
  #14  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
NeedBoost!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
26psi is not "conservative".

I'm very confused why the spool up is so delayed as well - what elevation are you at?
I don't see an O2/DP in your mod list, are you running stock? If so, change that immediately lol.

You have a built bottom end, why are you so worried about being conservative? Stock these things will run 375-400tq all day for years to come.

I'm on 91oct and Cobb Tuning got 414/350 out my my MHI on their Mustang Dyno. Not every dyno yields the same numbers regardless of "brand" but your graph concerns me and makes me feel bad for you with all the $ you've put into your baby.

EDIT: Honestly, not hitting peak tq until almost 4300rpm on this turbo is just wrong.....seriously, massively wrong.
Old Jun 8, 2015, 06:21 AM
  #15  
Evolving Member
 
formerSTIowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: rockford, il
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Prosdoc
Just came across this thread...his gains, with a few more mods, look to net about the same as mine.

http://www.evoxforums.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=217154
I think you are looking at the wrong dyno in that link. He hit 398 whp on a mustang dyno, you hit 352 - considerable different. He also has ~30 wtq as well.


Quick Reply: 2013 GSR, Boostin Performance tuned. Baseline to MHI 18k



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:44 PM.