Notices

Evo X 2010 and 2011 - did they get rid of lag?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2011, 04:03 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
 
richardjh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,447
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
the TPS limitter has nothing todo with initial input lag...

let me know about SSport - coz I have 3 maps that affect throttle ramp up rates, and SSport is set to 100%, but normal/sport are much less...
I'd very much like to have a play with those maps! 2 maps, in my case - no S/Sport mode on RA.

I recently had a very experienced mechanic (old-timer) tell me the car scared him witless when he pulled out in traffic during a test drive - due to the initial "thinking about it" pause as the ECU raises revs before engaging clutch on a standing start.

As I noted above, the computer can't read minds. But if there is a way to shave even 1/5 second off that initial delay with a throttle "delta" tweak, it's surely got to help.

Rich
Old May 9, 2011, 04:42 PM
  #17  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra

let me know about SSport - coz I have 3 maps that affect throttle ramp up rates, and SSport is set to 100%, but normal/sport are much less...
I forgot about these. Are they defined the same as before or do you have updates?

I can test them out but just want to make sure I have the latest.
Old May 9, 2011, 08:02 PM
  #18  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
no same as always...
Old May 9, 2011, 08:16 PM
  #19  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
no same as always...
unit8?
Old May 9, 2011, 08:24 PM
  #20  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
yeah 0-255.

Percent255 works as well, since 255 = 100%

but uint8 will be fine...

To me those tables always looked like throttle ramp up rates... There is a 4th table for 5MT as well...

So in lower gears you need more throttle for anything to happen... But in SSPORT you get max throttle response... thats why I always ask does the "take off lag" exist in SSPORT??

And before anyone ask's Bryan and I have been sitting on these tables for a LONNNNG time... like many others just never got around to testing them properly...
Old May 11, 2011, 12:54 PM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Mad_SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
yeah 0-255.

Percent255 works as well, since 255 = 100%

but uint8 will be fine...

To me those tables always looked like throttle ramp up rates... There is a 4th table for 5MT as well...

So in lower gears you need more throttle for anything to happen... But in SSPORT you get max throttle response... thats why I always ask does the "take off lag" exist in SSPORT??

And before anyone ask's Bryan and I have been sitting on these tables for a LONNNNG time... like many others just never got around to testing them properly...
Let me know if you guys need testing help... I'm also a 2010 ra sport back, though mine still has the little baby turbo on it

Last edited by Mad_SB; May 11, 2011 at 12:59 PM.
Old May 11, 2011, 01:35 PM
  #22  
Evolving Member
 
menasor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: California
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is still some lag in first gear, but i felt a huge improvement between an 08 ralliart sportback and my 11 MR. In the sportback, even with a mild foot on the gas pedal, it would still lag a bunch (barely move for 1-2 seconds) before actually moving and then giving me way too more acceleration than I wanted. In the 11 MR, I feel much much less lag moving from a complete stop, and there the "lag" is definitely less pronounced.
Old May 13, 2011, 08:10 AM
  #23  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
So noone can tell me if SSPORT gives better throttle response when taking off from a stop???
Old May 15, 2011, 08:04 PM
  #24  
Evolving Member
 
Beeble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
So noone can tell me if SSPORT gives better throttle response when taking off from a stop???
IMO it's better in SSport.
less input lag, for want of a better phrase.
Old May 15, 2011, 08:32 PM
  #25  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
but what about takeoff lag?

ie the lag when trying to move the car from standstill?
Old May 15, 2011, 08:53 PM
  #26  
Evolving Member
 
Beeble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
^ ie the lag time from when you tap the throttle to when the thing decides to move?
that depends on 2 things as you know...
1) time for the clutch/gear to engage
2) throttle input lag

item 2) is definitely better in SSport vs Normal, it feels like there is "smoothing" at work for all throttle inputs in Normal mode
item 1) - honestly i can't convince myself that from a dead stop with brake on, then hitting the throttle, if SSport is quicker to engage than Normal mode. You can feel when this happens, and the car will start to move off.. but in Normal it seems to take longer to register 100% TPS input Vs in SSport (ie item 2 )

^^I'm interested if other SST owners agree with this assessment, or if it's just me!

D, you really should spend 10 minutes in my car one day and cycle through the modes and what take off from dead stop and on-the-roll throttle inputs feel like. Very weird, after a 5MT.
Old Sep 1, 2016, 02:36 AM
  #27  
Newbie
 
mrevo10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: london
Posts: 18
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Beeble
^ ie the lag time from when you tap the throttle to when the thing decides to move?
that depends on 2 things as you know...
1) time for the clutch/gear to engage
2) throttle input lag

item 2) is definitely better in SSport vs Normal, it feels like there is "smoothing" at work for all throttle inputs in Normal mode
item 1) - honestly i can't convince myself that from a dead stop with brake on, then hitting the throttle, if SSport is quicker to engage than Normal mode. You can feel when this happens, and the car will start to move off.. but in Normal it seems to take longer to register 100% TPS input Vs in SSport (ie item 2 )

^^I'm interested if other SST owners agree with this assessment, or if it's just me!

D, you really should spend 10 minutes in my car one day and cycle through the modes and what take off from dead stop and on-the-roll throttle inputs feel like. Very weird, after a 5MT.
Reviving an old thread..

I totally agree with you Beeble.. S/Sport mode definitely makes the throttle response much quicker, but I hate using S/Sport mode when driving in the city...it throws you into gear. S/Sport is great when you are MOVING. It seems though its the best way to improve response on a stock TCU tune... In normal and sport mode when you take off at an intersection quickly you have to contend with the delay in throttle response as well as the delay in clutch/gear lag.

I am interested to know who has the best resolution for this issue and developed a well respected software solution for a 2009 MR SST approaching 400hp.
Old Sep 4, 2016, 04:46 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Hiboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,222
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
I know i've posted this trick in other threads but you can alter your 1st Gear TPS Limiter table to something like this to get the clutchpacks to engage faster off the line in 1st gear:

500 = 100
1000 = 100
1500 = 30
2000 = 100
2500 = 100
3000 = 100
3500 = 100
4000 = 100
4500 = 100

Beyond 4500 you will likely have to start dialing back TPS again as you just hit full boost in 1st gear and the more horsepower your cars has the more TPS you have to dial back so that it can complete a 1st -> 2nd upshift.

There are other tables that will have an effect as well but the side effect can be very sensitive throttle. Personally I think it's worth it but anyone driving the car for the first time will feel like it has a hair trigger.
Old Sep 29, 2016, 04:41 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
domyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 878
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Nice idea, it's like an automatic throttle blip !

Another thing that makes this stop/start delay worse is when the transmission is cold, god it's slow to engage the clutchpacks. When it's warmed up, it's much more responsive.

I'd love to find a more direct way to lower the engagement point that the TCU chooses based on throttle input.
Old Dec 30, 2016, 08:34 PM
  #30  
Newbie
 
Jon Hovie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Let your SST warm up and responds perfectly!
The following users liked this post:
nickyd (Jan 16, 2017)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tunermt
Evo X General
52
Feb 9, 2020 06:23 AM
Maverick09
09+ Lancer Ralliart General
127
Feb 1, 2018 08:47 AM
evoskrt
ECU Flash
3
Oct 25, 2017 07:09 AM
Boosted EVO 9
For Sale - Cars For Sale
0
Jan 19, 2017 07:57 AM
Isaque
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
1
Jun 13, 2016 01:17 PM



Quick Reply: Evo X 2010 and 2011 - did they get rid of lag?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:53 PM.