Drew WRX: Accessport vs. XEDE
May 22, 2005, 05:02 PM
#49
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Wa
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperHatch
at this whole thread 
good
May 22, 2005, 06:04 PM
#50
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Birmingham, Al
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My brother has a cobb stage 2 WRX. His car is VERY much slower when he puts the ECU back stock and just runs the stock programming. He also ran a 13.4 @ 101 on pump gas, full weight, etc w/ the cobb programming in place. 96 mph w/out the AP.
He also dyno'ed 232 whp, 240 wtq w/ the AP @ topspeed.
He also dyno'ed 232 whp, 240 wtq w/ the AP @ topspeed.
May 22, 2005, 09:21 PM
#51
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: rancho cucamonga
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mlevo
could you tell me some spec of you mod? i would be so happy to see and know the result of vishnu stage 1?hopefully you can show me the dyno map , anyways what psi were you runing to hit that much hp wiht 93 octance?
I have uppipe, downpipe, and borla catback....no cats as stated in the first post. 91 octane
May 22, 2005, 09:24 PM
#52
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: rancho cucamonga
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by A418t81
My brother has a cobb stage 2 WRX. His car is VERY much slower when he puts the ECU back stock and just runs the stock programming. He also ran a 13.4 @ 101 on pump gas, full weight, etc w/ the cobb programming in place. 96 mph w/out the AP.
He also dyno'ed 232 whp, 240 wtq w/ the AP @ topspeed.
He also dyno'ed 232 whp, 240 wtq w/ the AP @ topspeed.
When I ran the "stock map" that was on the AP, it was slow as dog poop also. However, on the OEM ECU, it pulled pretty damn good....evidence is in the dyno charts.
Jun 9, 2005, 06:25 PM
#53
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We saw some similar results at our Dyno day at Harman motive last year. 3 cars from AWJ running Cobb stg2 pinging like crazy and all making 214hp 205tq, both with full catless TBE and K&N drop in filters. Hours later another WRX on the rollers turned 215hp and 210 tq with a catless downpipe and blitz muffler.
Yes Cobb has ****ty tunes. And their new CA 91oct map isn't much better than the previous.
Yes Cobb has ****ty tunes. And their new CA 91oct map isn't much better than the previous.
Jun 9, 2005, 08:52 PM
#54
Evolving Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: rancho cucamonga
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tarmac02
We saw some similar results at our Dyno day at Harman motive last year. 3 cars from AWJ running Cobb stg2 pinging like crazy and all making 214hp 205tq, both with full catless TBE and K&N drop in filters. Hours later another WRX on the rollers turned 215hp and 210 tq with a catless downpipe and blitz muffler.
Yes Cobb has ****ty tunes. And their new CA 91oct map isn't much better than the previous.
Yes Cobb has ****ty tunes. And their new CA 91oct map isn't much better than the previous.
. I was there when a Vishnu guy with a UNICHIP put down ~230whp on the stage 0 map when he was running the equivalent of stage 1.
Dec 12, 2005, 06:37 PM
#55
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dallas tx/Miami fl
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by alleggerita
BTW on nasioc.com there is at least one report of an STI grenading big time when road racing with an accessport tune.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shiv@vishnu
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
76
Apr 21, 2008 08:38 PM
shiv@vishnu
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
213
Aug 5, 2005 03:05 PM
