2004 Lancer Sportback Ralliart AT Build
#46
Got the dust seals (from Turbokits) on, that were missing for the injectors...
Hackish, WHERE'S MY REFLASH?!
I haven't even got to the purchasing the piping part of this build yet, not to mention the installation, but am excited nonetheless to install the fuel management steps and NA flash while I'm waiting!
Hackish, WHERE'S MY REFLASH?!
I haven't even got to the purchasing the piping part of this build yet, not to mention the installation, but am excited nonetheless to install the fuel management steps and NA flash while I'm waiting!
Last edited by truthdweller; Aug 21, 2012 at 03:02 PM.
#47
I spoke with Turbokits, and Jesse isn't aware of Brent having to have used longer fuel rail bolts with the spacers on his kit, although, this isn't confirmed yet. I just called Brent and left a message.
Last edited by truthdweller; Aug 21, 2012 at 07:40 PM.
#50
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
there's weird stuff like torque limiters and stuff, i'm sure hackish will get it straight away...i'm still waiting on the editor, i'm tuned and loving it, but i got a big 16g and a boost controller in my garage
the total length may be the same, but maybe how deep the injector is recessed in the rail, or the nozzle end in the intake manifold is different...i needed longer bolts with the wrx injectors...
the total length may be the same, but maybe how deep the injector is recessed in the rail, or the nozzle end in the intake manifold is different...i needed longer bolts with the wrx injectors...
#51
Like i've said in the past, I'm really new to all this, but have you all seen this write up by this Russian guy on forced induction? The thread gets interesting from the start after he lists the 4g69's specifications:
"If you leave the stock parts, we can boldly say - 100 HP per liter volume. Go back to step 1. The volume of 2378cc. Thus, the safe capacity will reach 238 hp. A further increase will require strengthening of the engine and the transmission."
or this...
"You think 210 HP is very little? Believe me, it will be a very fast car. Is much faster than a stock V6. Because it is important not only power as such. We must take into account the weight of the vehicle and a gear ratio gearbox. I stopped at the power of 210 HP."
http://forum.380db.com/forum/forums/...sts=31&start=1
"If you leave the stock parts, we can boldly say - 100 HP per liter volume. Go back to step 1. The volume of 2378cc. Thus, the safe capacity will reach 238 hp. A further increase will require strengthening of the engine and the transmission."
or this...
"You think 210 HP is very little? Believe me, it will be a very fast car. Is much faster than a stock V6. Because it is important not only power as such. We must take into account the weight of the vehicle and a gear ratio gearbox. I stopped at the power of 210 HP."
http://forum.380db.com/forum/forums/...sts=31&start=1
Last edited by truthdweller; Aug 23, 2012 at 08:22 AM.
#52
Evolved Member
My car has been running with about 250hp now for about 2 years. I am on stock internals and stock trans, and trust I am not easy on the car. All in the name of R&D....ok and some fun....
Like i've said in the past, I'm really new to all this, but have you all seen this write up by this Russian guy on forced induction? The thread gets interesting from the start after he lists the 4g69's specifications:
"If you leave the stock parts, we can boldly say - 100 HP per liter volume. Go back to step 1. The volume of 2378cc. Thus, the safe capacity will reach 238 hp. A further increase will require strengthening of the engine and the transmission."
or this...
"You think 210 HP is very little? Believe me, it will be a very fast car. Is much faster than a stock V6. Because it is important not only power as such. We must take into account the weight of the vehicle and a gear ratio gearbox. I stopped at the power of 210 HP."
http://forum.380db.com/forum/forums/...sts=31&start=1
"If you leave the stock parts, we can boldly say - 100 HP per liter volume. Go back to step 1. The volume of 2378cc. Thus, the safe capacity will reach 238 hp. A further increase will require strengthening of the engine and the transmission."
or this...
"You think 210 HP is very little? Believe me, it will be a very fast car. Is much faster than a stock V6. Because it is important not only power as such. We must take into account the weight of the vehicle and a gear ratio gearbox. I stopped at the power of 210 HP."
http://forum.380db.com/forum/forums/...sts=31&start=1
#57
But that Russian guy is on it , I've watched his work through club4g and he is constantly welding something although it's for the 4g69 galant
Last edited by truthdweller; Aug 23, 2012 at 09:51 PM.
#60
Really? If I'm not mistaken, a 4g69 on a MT is the same as that on an AT. Were talking engines not tranny's. With 300whp on a 2378cc 4g69 MIVEC engine with stock internals, my limited knowledge would venture to guess that it wouldn't last long. Just like the EVO that reached 1000+ whp...they were blowing up engines to reach that mark, but for practicality purposes, such that Brent's car has proven...NOT!
Last edited by truthdweller; Aug 24, 2012 at 09:41 AM.