Notices

Official "CAI vs SRI" Thread

Old Jul 26, 2007, 04:33 PM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
DangerousDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
your welcome
Old Jul 29, 2007, 04:45 AM
  #32  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
 
MITVRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A sticky, thanks otter! (i'm assuming it is otter because he monitors us fellas, if its not , then thank you to whom it may concern!)
Old Aug 16, 2007, 07:33 PM
  #33  
Newbie
 
sfuboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wonder.. has anyone noticed any Gas mileage differences before and after installing a SRI or CAI?

Is your car a MT or AT?
Old Aug 17, 2007, 10:59 AM
  #34  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Skott2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found a mitsubishi specialty shop where i live but its kinda small and they seemed somewhat un-knowledgeable so ill ask the experts . I was trying to buy a short ram injen for my 06 lancer but they said they dont make one. if you can make a cold air into a shorm ram certainly they would sell both right? anyone know if there is a sri for 06 and where can i get it?
Old Aug 17, 2007, 02:43 PM
  #35  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
gjgfrombigd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
CAI for dummies

No Injen short ram available seperately for the RA. You have to puchase the CAI and take the lower section off to make it a SRI.
IMHO the only positive difference between a stock intake and a SRI is the sound and the appearance when you lift the hood.
The negative list has already been stated numerous times.
To the person who purchases an Injen CAI and converts it to a SRI instead of installing an AEM bypass valve to eliminate hydro-lock and begs for heat soak while they're wondering why their 87 octane pump gas at over $3/gal isn't providing more horsepower and is decreasing their gas mileage over stock:....Kick your own, cause UR1 if you just read this!<--Not intended for you Skott.

Last edited by gjgfrombigd; Aug 17, 2007 at 02:54 PM.
Old Oct 25, 2007, 08:36 PM
  #36  
Newbie
 
Gun_Strife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sfuboy
Just wonder.. has anyone noticed any Gas mileage differences before and after installing a SRI or CAI?

Is your car a MT or AT?
nobody huh
Old Nov 2, 2007, 09:33 PM
  #37  
Newbie
 
NC_Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gun_Strife
nobody huh
I was getting about 230-240 miles a tank without the sri,
with it I get about 250-260 miles a tank.....When i say tank that is when the gas light comes on. Filling up form the gas light for me is like 10.5 gallons so that is
22.3 before and 24.28MPG after...this is with a mix of Highway and city....Highway only i have gotten a best of 288 miles before that red light...27.4MPG, hope this helps..PS I have an auto
Old Nov 2, 2007, 10:32 PM
  #38  
Newbie
 
sfuboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think i'll be getting heat soak over here in Canada... this place is never hot hot hot.. like Texas
Old Nov 3, 2007, 09:29 AM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
DangerousDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 4,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
heat soak comes from the engine bay temps, which can be much higher than outside temps if you aren't moving.
Old Nov 3, 2007, 09:21 PM
  #40  
Evolved Member
 
stEVOx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^RA heat soak is the worst.
i had a heat shield, cheapy $20 one from supercheapauto, didnt do much, but i want to fab up a air dam.
Old Dec 16, 2007, 07:22 PM
  #41  
Newbie
 
OTchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Victoria
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Someone told me that SRI will actually drop my lower end torque. I drive a lancer es 06 is this true? I thought it was suppose to increase it.
Old Dec 16, 2007, 08:40 PM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
06RedRalli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Killeen,Tx
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by OTchie
Someone told me that SRI will actually drop my lower end torque. I drive a lancer es 06 is this true? I thought it was suppose to increase it.
I've been told the exact opposite that it increased low torque but would get more horsepower from a cai..and less from sri?
Old Dec 16, 2007, 10:41 PM
  #43  
Evolved Member
 
stEVOx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you wont get less hp

sri gives better low end coz it can suck in the air easier compared to CAI which has to go thru over a meter of piping or so. but SRI is suseptable to heat soak where CAI gives cold air
i know i cant explain well, hopefully mitvrx or dan or otter, etc will come fix up what i said ...
Old Dec 16, 2007, 11:07 PM
  #44  
Newbie
 
Sandtallic JDM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: sylmar , CA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice alott of info nice
Old Dec 17, 2007, 01:30 AM
  #45  
Newbie
 
OTchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Victoria
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeh the installer told me i would lose lower torque from around 1000-2000 rpm and im only drivin a es so thats a bit for me. So whats the deal? ohh and has anyone used k&h Typhoon short ram? I have a 2.4 litre engine will it fit in my lancer?
http://www.knfilters.com/typhoon/default.htm

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Official "CAI vs SRI" Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:51 AM.