Boost gauge question
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury ON
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boost gauge question
Did some quick searching, couldn't find an answer to this. To the people running a boost gauge, which vacuum/boost line have you been tapping into? My first thought would be to tap into the line connecting the bypass valve to the intake mani (just put a T in the line). My second option would be to tap into the line for the FPR boost reference, which would let me know instantly if it happened to to come off under boost. My third option was to T into both lines, run a hose between these two Ts, with a T in the middle which runs to my boost gauge. This would let me know if either line came off.
What do u guys think?
What do u guys think?
#7
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Sudbury ON
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Option 1 is what I was leaning to. Mad_SB, could you shed some light on why not to use #3? I figured since both lines draw pressure from the intake mani, they should see the same pressure.
Last edited by SudzRA; Jun 16, 2011 at 03:32 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
I think the issue with #2 is that, in the event of a fault with the new boost hose connection, the fuel pressure regulator won't see its proper boost reference.
Which is a really Bad Thing at WOT.
Nobody wants to sacrifice their engine for the sake of a gauge that is ostensibly there for safety reasons!
Rich
Which is a really Bad Thing at WOT.
Nobody wants to sacrifice their engine for the sake of a gauge that is ostensibly there for safety reasons!
Rich
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Agreed, however I have seen cars running #1 setup with bpv opening/fluttering and compressor surge issues. My guess is that there were other factors involved that I don't know about, as well, I just know that it's happened.
As far as running at the FPR, with my AEM gauge at least, there is only a very short (4", if that) hose needed at the T and then it connects right onto the electrical sender portion. That way there are only wires, not hose, running the length of the engine bay, minimizing the possibility of pinching/cutting/burning/etc. the vacuum source hose.
As far as running at the FPR, with my AEM gauge at least, there is only a very short (4", if that) hose needed at the T and then it connects right onto the electrical sender portion. That way there are only wires, not hose, running the length of the engine bay, minimizing the possibility of pinching/cutting/burning/etc. the vacuum source hose.
#12
Evolving Member
iTrader: (82)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: southcal
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the issue with #2 is that, in the event of a fault with the new boost hose connection, the fuel pressure regulator won't see its proper boost reference.
Which is a really Bad Thing at WOT.
Nobody wants to sacrifice their engine for the sake of a gauge that is ostensibly there for safety reasons!
Rich
Which is a really Bad Thing at WOT.
Nobody wants to sacrifice their engine for the sake of a gauge that is ostensibly there for safety reasons!
Rich
#14
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While it is true that #2 will also let you know of the FPR line pops off.. a wideband will also do that without introducing an additional point of failure (the line from the T to the boost sensor, be it mechanical or electronic). #3 is the worst of both worlds in that you now have 3 potential failure points and any of which will result in lean in boost condition.
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...
As far as running at the FPR, with my AEM gauge at least, there is only a very short (4", if that) hose needed at the T and then it connects right onto the electrical sender portion. That way there are only wires, not hose, running the length of the engine bay, minimizing the possibility of pinching/cutting/burning/etc. the vacuum source hose.
As far as running at the FPR, with my AEM gauge at least, there is only a very short (4", if that) hose needed at the T and then it connects right onto the electrical sender portion. That way there are only wires, not hose, running the length of the engine bay, minimizing the possibility of pinching/cutting/burning/etc. the vacuum source hose.