Here we are guys. I am aware that these graphs may not have exactly all the applications you wanted to view, however it give you an idea of the differences for now.
The first one I am going to post is the Evo IX on the same day same dyno, after Nick#1 tweaked the IX with Ecutek for a second time. Increased the numbers quite drastically on a completely stock Evo IX with only a boost controller. The second graph on the same chart is the same Evo IX, same day, with the addition of a downpipe and catback, stock catalytic converter still in tact.

 

The next graph shows you the "03 Evo VIII with the stock cams and white rabbit turbo, The Evo IX with exhaust and boost controller, and then shows my "05 Evo VIII with 272's, exhaust and boost controller. ALL on Ecutek.

 

Had to show your car huh??? LOL Its a fast car

 

The next graph shows the comparison of the Evo VIII with stock cams and the white rabbit turbo that we tested two days prior to today, with the Evo IX (exhaust/boost controller) All on Ecutek.

 

That looks like the IX has 50 more HP than the VIII....Is that right? Hey Nick, i wonder if the stock cam profiles are different between the IX and VIII.

 

Lastly, I have a comparison of the stock Evo IX with boost controller on our initial test, the Evo IX tweaked on the following day same mods, and the Evo IX with exhaust and boost controller. Hope this gives everyone an idea. Every graph shows the cars with our Ecutek flash keep in mind! Thanks!!

 

Pics aren't working...

 

where the pics at?

 

There in his posts

 

Pictures arn't working for me.

 

Sorry guys, not too sure why the pics are working right now. I will figure it out tomorrow. My apologies.

 

I bet you hosted them somewhere rather than uploading them here.... that is why many of us can't view them.

Keith

 

waiting impatiently
go sox

 

Pics not working here either

 

Nick,

usually at these power levels, the VIII would require upgrading the fuel pump. The IX's fuel pump is working fine??