20g records, Stock Appearing Class etc.....
There's been quite a few discussion on this subject.
A 20G-9 turbo is a good performer at 24+psi.
If you stay below 24 psi and 91 oct. you will be disappointed.
My 2 cents.
A 20G-9 turbo is a good performer at 24+psi.
If you stay below 24 psi and 91 oct. you will be disappointed.
My 2 cents.
Originally Posted by 4cefed
i still am wondering what to expect on just 91 oct
Originally Posted by kjewer1
I don't know about you, but I would rather have Dave spend his time actually working on the product to get it done, and then tested, and THEN post about it. 
Thankfully some poeple still put the keyboard down and go out into the garage once in a while. 
I will patiently await the results of the testing, and could care less for useless chatter in the mean time.
Thankfully some poeple still put the keyboard down and go out into the garage once in a while. I will patiently await the results of the testing, and could care less for useless chatter in the mean time.WE WANA KNOW WE WANA KNOW WE WANA KNOW.
Originally Posted by kjewer1
I don't know about you, but I would rather have Dave spend his time actually working on the product to get it done, and then tested, and THEN post about it. Thankfully some poeple still put the keyboard down and go out into the garage once in a while. I will patiently await the results of the testing, and could care less for useless chatter in the mean time.
Thankfully some poeple still put the keyboard down and go out into the garage once in a while. I will patiently await the results of the testing, and could care less for useless chatter in the mean time.
Originally Posted by dustin03
so I want to know if there will be a better version of the 20g I wish I could get Busher to respond..........
trust me
Is there a better version of the 20g coming out? Depends on what you are looking for. We are working on something now and it is on my car. My car ran 10.89 at 128.56 mph with it. Next week I am testing yet another version which we are hoping will be the final of this stage of the turbo. It will hopefully put my car to 500 whp on our dyno on C16. This will put the traps speeds with a bolt on turbo over 130 mph.
The turbo I am running right now is laggier than the 20g-9-5 we are using/selling currently. So we are all clear, the current 20g-9-5 is no slouch. With a LOT of cars now running under 11.50's and at 120+ mph trap speeds in full weight EVO's I'd say it is a proven performer. My car ran 11.20 at 124 mph. Trent's is running 11.20 at 122 mph on pump with alky, Trevor has gone 11.2 at 121 mph, Chris went 11.3 at 120 mph. There are more but those stick in my head.
The new version is going to spool a little slower and cost a little more. What we are shooting for is a stock appearing turbo, bolts to the stock manifold/02 housing, uses stock oil and water lines and will make 500 whp on our dyno.
The turbo I am running right now is laggier than the 20g-9-5 we are using/selling currently. So we are all clear, the current 20g-9-5 is no slouch. With a LOT of cars now running under 11.50's and at 120+ mph trap speeds in full weight EVO's I'd say it is a proven performer. My car ran 11.20 at 124 mph. Trent's is running 11.20 at 122 mph on pump with alky, Trevor has gone 11.2 at 121 mph, Chris went 11.3 at 120 mph. There are more but those stick in my head.
The new version is going to spool a little slower and cost a little more. What we are shooting for is a stock appearing turbo, bolts to the stock manifold/02 housing, uses stock oil and water lines and will make 500 whp on our dyno.
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
The new version is going to spool a little slower and cost a little more. What we are shooting for is a stock appearing turbo, bolts to the stock manifold/02 housing, uses stock oil and water lines and will make 500 whp on our dyno.
Good to hear David. That is awesome news. I knew it was a new compressor wheel right after I heard you dyno numbers at the Shootout. The 20G-9-5 will only flow so much CFM, and with those new numbers you made and the extra MPH in the 1/4, there was no other option except NOS (which would be cheating at your own race) which I knew you wouldnt do. Sneaky, yes, Cheating no.
One question about the new turbo on your car, does it still use the 2 1/2" to 3" reducer at the end of your MAF pipe where it hooks to the turbo?
Brian
One question about the new turbo on your car, does it still use the 2 1/2" to 3" reducer at the end of your MAF pipe where it hooks to the turbo?
Brian
The turbo still uses the 2.5" to 3" reducer.
Also, turbodawg, or should I say, young grasshopper, don't jump to conclusions.......the compressor wheel in the turbo on my car is not changed
justchil,
The turbo you are running now my ET slip looked like this:
60' 1.57
330' 4.61
1/8th 7.14
1/8th mph 100.10
1000' 9.300
1/4 11.11
1/4 mph 123.77
The turbo on the car now did this:
60' 1.70
330' 4.64
1/8th 7.07
1/8th mph 101.87
1000 9.14
1/4 et 10.89
1/4 mph 128.58
Also, turbodawg, or should I say, young grasshopper, don't jump to conclusions.......the compressor wheel in the turbo on my car is not changed
justchil,
The turbo you are running now my ET slip looked like this:
60' 1.57
330' 4.61
1/8th 7.14
1/8th mph 100.10
1000' 9.300
1/4 11.11
1/4 mph 123.77
The turbo on the car now did this:
60' 1.70
330' 4.64
1/8th 7.07
1/8th mph 101.87
1000 9.14
1/4 et 10.89
1/4 mph 128.58
