Jun 272's Vs. HKS 280's 55-60whp!
Here's the straight poop. Straight back to back test with these cams. The only thing changed was the fuelling curve to keep the A/F ratio's consistant.
At roughly 40-41psi on a GT42 we made about 55-60whp more with the JUN 272's over the HKS 280's. Idle quality is compromised with the Jun 272's so I will only recommend them for people running a stand-alone or hard core stock ecu guys. You will not a have a fun time getting them to idle with a stock ECU, but they really wont' be a problem on a speed density based engine managment. We are now carrying the full line of JUN cams and for people who want to run them with a stock ECU I would recommend the 264's over the 272's. Please call the shop and speak with Eric for further info - 847-709-0530. -Martin |
Ask and you shall recieve
Eric |
WOW that is extremely hard to belive but not takin your word would be dumb, dyno or test sheet to help out man?
|
what kind of power gains could u see with gt35r2.0 running 35 psi with those cams?
|
Probably slightly less, come on, use your imagination a bit hehe.
Scorke |
martin is working on sheets now
Remember how we jumped from 826 -903 on his car ;) this was a big reason for it. Eric |
hellll yeaaa ha nce job guys, should just change your name to Awesome Moto Sports, what i would do
|
Is just peak power bumped up, or is it all across the powerband?
Scorke |
Originally Posted by scorke
Is just peak power bumped up, or is it all across the powerband?
Scorke |
ha wait, the site says $960 for the set, is that right? cuz HolyS that is high
|
its an all around better cam. not just peak power
Eric |
Sweet, im guessing some of that comes from a more aggressive ramp up and lift, would you guys reccomend springs if we were to go with these bumpsticks?
Scorke |
We are adding them right now but we are out of stock at the moment. we have a ton on order but it is japan so its not a very quick process.
we are selling them for $375 a cam and upgraded springs and retainers are highly recomended. Eric |
Originally Posted by AMS
Here's the straight poop. Straight back to back test with these cams. The only thing changed was the fuelling curve to keep the A/F ratio's consistant.
At roughly 40-41psi on a GT42 we made about 55-60whp more with the JUN 272's over the HKS 280's. Idle quality is compromised with the Jun 272's so I will only recommend them for people running a stand-alone or hard core stock ecu guys. You will not a have a fun time getting them to idle with a stock ECU, but they really wont' be a problem on a speed density based engine managment. We are now carrying the full line of JUN cams and for people who want to run them with a stock ECU I would recommend the 264's over the 272's. Please call the shop and speak with Eric for further info - 847-709-0530. -Martin Hows the do these jun cams idle with the aem Ems? Are they noticeble? |
That really depends on the tuner. Martin has gotten them to idle quite well.
Eric |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands