EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/)
-   Automotosports - Illinois (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/automotosports-illinois-71/)
-   -   Jun 272's Vs. HKS 280's 55-60whp! (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/automotosports-illinois/191427-jun-272s-vs-hks-280s-55-60whp.html)

AMS Mar 23, 2006 03:31 PM

Jun 272's Vs. HKS 280's 55-60whp!
 
Here's the straight poop. Straight back to back test with these cams. The only thing changed was the fuelling curve to keep the A/F ratio's consistant.
At roughly 40-41psi on a GT42 we made about 55-60whp more with the JUN 272's over the HKS 280's. Idle quality is compromised with the Jun 272's so I will only recommend them for people running a stand-alone or hard core stock ecu guys. You will not a have a fun time getting them to idle with a stock ECU, but they really wont' be a problem on a speed density based engine managment.

We are now carrying the full line of JUN cams and for people who want to run them with a stock ECU I would recommend the 264's over the 272's. Please call the shop and speak with Eric for further info - 847-709-0530.

-Martin

AutoMotoSports Mar 23, 2006 03:32 PM

Ask and you shall recieve

Eric

blkAMSevo8 Mar 23, 2006 03:36 PM

WOW that is extremely hard to belive but not takin your word would be dumb, dyno or test sheet to help out man?

blkAMSevo8 Mar 23, 2006 03:39 PM

what kind of power gains could u see with gt35r2.0 running 35 psi with those cams?

scorke Mar 23, 2006 03:40 PM

Probably slightly less, come on, use your imagination a bit hehe.

Scorke

AutoMotoSports Mar 23, 2006 03:42 PM

martin is working on sheets now

Remember how we jumped from 826 -903 on his car

;) this was a big reason for it.

Eric

blkAMSevo8 Mar 23, 2006 03:48 PM

hellll yeaaa ha nce job guys, should just change your name to Awesome Moto Sports, what i would do

scorke Mar 23, 2006 03:49 PM

Is just peak power bumped up, or is it all across the powerband?

Scorke

ROGERV Mar 23, 2006 03:52 PM


Originally Posted by scorke
Is just peak power bumped up, or is it all across the powerband?

Scorke

good question.

blkAMSevo8 Mar 23, 2006 03:54 PM

ha wait, the site says $960 for the set, is that right? cuz HolyS that is high

AutoMotoSports Mar 23, 2006 03:54 PM

its an all around better cam. not just peak power

Eric

scorke Mar 23, 2006 03:58 PM

Sweet, im guessing some of that comes from a more aggressive ramp up and lift, would you guys reccomend springs if we were to go with these bumpsticks?

Scorke

AutoMotoSports Mar 23, 2006 04:02 PM

We are adding them right now but we are out of stock at the moment. we have a ton on order but it is japan so its not a very quick process.

we are selling them for $375 a cam and upgraded springs and retainers are highly recomended.

Eric

Evo8Master Mar 23, 2006 04:12 PM


Originally Posted by AMS
Here's the straight poop. Straight back to back test with these cams. The only thing changed was the fuelling curve to keep the A/F ratio's consistant.
At roughly 40-41psi on a GT42 we made about 55-60whp more with the JUN 272's over the HKS 280's. Idle quality is compromised with the Jun 272's so I will only recommend them for people running a stand-alone or hard core stock ecu guys. You will not a have a fun time getting them to idle with a stock ECU, but they really wont' be a problem on a speed density based engine managment.

We are now carrying the full line of JUN cams and for people who want to run them with a stock ECU I would recommend the 264's over the 272's. Please call the shop and speak with Eric for further info - 847-709-0530.

-Martin


Hows the do these jun cams idle with the aem Ems? Are they noticeble?

AutoMotoSports Mar 23, 2006 04:13 PM

That really depends on the tuner. Martin has gotten them to idle quite well.

Eric


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands