Notices
E85 / Ethanol This section is dedicated to tuning with ethanol.

Going lean on wot on e-85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2013, 06:14 AM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ReaperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Are you running psi based bc or load based bc?
Old Aug 9, 2013, 08:09 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
An easy test would be to add more fuel to your tune and see if it responds. If not, then something in your fuel system is able to keep up.
Old Aug 11, 2013, 02:03 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
asu11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 737
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ReaperX
Are you running psi based bc or load based bc?
PSI based on SD
Old Aug 11, 2013, 02:04 AM
  #19  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
asu11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 737
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cdrinkh2o
The lower temperature in the evening, compared to the 105 deg F you set your tune at, means that the air is denser and so your engine is actually getting more air. Unless you increase the fueling to match, this will make your AFR higher, i.e. leaner. E85 fueling is more sensitive to temperature changes than gas probably because of it's higher flash point and greater latent heat of vaporization.
Yeah, I just don't think that much of a delta between day and night should occur. At least I have not seen the jump with similar tuned cars.
Old Aug 11, 2013, 08:50 AM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ReaperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Are you logging your runs? Mind posting a day and night run?

I am still working on understanding SD with 93, I have yet to start messing with it on E85 as temperature seems to affect it.

With out seeing a log atm you may just want to put a little more fuel back in it where it goes lean in the cooler air.
Old Aug 11, 2013, 06:00 PM
  #21  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
asu11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 737
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ReaperX
Are you logging your runs? Mind posting a day and night run?

I am still working on understanding SD with 93, I have yet to start messing with it on E85 as temperature seems to affect it.

With out seeing a log atm you may just want to put a little more fuel back in it where it goes lean in the cooler air.
Yes i am logging when I get the chance.

I haven't had a chance this past week to mess with the tune, but I will b tweaking it soon. Will let you know how it turns out.
Old Oct 11, 2013, 09:50 AM
  #22  
Newbie
 
manden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: sweden
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How did it work out?
Old Feb 20, 2015, 07:44 AM
  #23  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
MR White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bump, having same issue and wondering how this was resolved
Old Feb 20, 2015, 08:47 AM
  #24  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
asu11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 737
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Check your tune, check fuel sock on pump, and possibly send injectors out to get cleaned and flow tested.
Old Feb 20, 2015, 06:22 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
hutch959's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,459
Received 109 Likes on 99 Posts
more than likely the injectors are not scaled correctly.
Old Apr 1, 2015, 05:31 PM
  #26  
Newbie
 
dsmluck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Broomfield
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had an issue where my tune went suddenly lean. I traced it back to the ethanol I was running. Depending on where I filled my E85 my WOT AFR would be spot on at 12 or a full point lean at 13. Turns out one station was running E75 or so and the other must be around E90. It can vary that much between stations.
Old Apr 2, 2015, 05:07 PM
  #27  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
galantman03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: WEST SIDE, SD
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^And that right there is why I test mine. But I have heard as long as its about E70 you are good, thats what TSComp has said anyways. I still test mine regardless that way I know what it is.
Old Apr 9, 2015, 03:53 PM
  #28  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
STLEVOIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: STL
Posts: 364
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
If you tune on e70 for a target AFR of 11.5-12.0, it give you leeway to when you get true e85. When you get actual e85 and your tuned on e70 with a target of 11.5-12.0, you'll be half a point leaner. I always go to pumps that have a minimum 70% ethanol. Most e85 pumps will say what their minimum content is. I stay away from the 51% ones and haven't had any issues.
Old Apr 11, 2015, 01:45 AM
  #29  
Newbie
 
manden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: sweden
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ethanol is much mor expensive to produce than gas. So often its e75 or even e70. It also contains sulfur. Its where you gte the hangover from.

The ethanol corrodes aluminium and resolve rubbers. You need teflon lines all the way, no direct contact with aluminium( make sure your fuelpump doesent have aluminum pump gears)

When you map on ethanol, it doesent ping untill its way, way too lean. It needs to be much richer then gasolene. It also reads different on your lambda, example 0.8 lambda = 11.8 on gas, 0.8 lambda on ethanol is 7.2. So it gets very rich when mapping after gas lambdas. My experience is that i need around 0.95 lambda at wot 30 psi 10.5 with a good combustion chamber, 83mm bore, and piston speeds around 27 m/sec. Timing would e 27-28.

Untill e85 is stabilized in production and sulfur free, ill stay away from it. The inconsistancy and quality is way too great.
Old Apr 16, 2015, 11:57 PM
  #30  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by manden
Ethanol is much mor expensive to produce than gas. So often its e75 or even e70. It also contains sulfur. Its where you gte the hangover from.

The ethanol corrodes aluminium and resolve rubbers. You need teflon lines all the way, no direct contact with aluminium( make sure your fuelpump doesent have aluminum pump gears)

When you map on ethanol, it doesent ping untill its way, way too lean. It needs to be much richer then gasolene. It also reads different on your lambda, example 0.8 lambda = 11.8 on gas, 0.8 lambda on ethanol is 7.2. So it gets very rich when mapping after gas lambdas. My experience is that i need around 0.95 lambda at wot 30 psi 10.5 with a good combustion chamber, 83mm bore, and piston speeds around 27 m/sec. Timing would e 27-28.

Untill e85 is stabilized in production and sulfur free, ill stay away from it. The inconsistancy and quality is way too great.
the corrosive quality of e85 is way overrated. i've been full time e85 since 2008 with zero issues. all the stock rubber parts that are in contact with the fuel are in perfect condition. no corrosion in my intake manifold runners. never heard of sulfer issues. ethanol content is definitely something to watch, but as far as i'm concerned, the same tune can be used on anything between e65 and e85. from a lambda perspective, e85 performs best at the same or leaner ratios than pump gas.

maybe you've just had bad luck.


Quick Reply: Going lean on wot on e-85



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:33 PM.