Notices
ECU Flash

Let's see your fully tuned timing maps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 07:09 PM
  #241  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
Originally Posted by mplspilot
That 15.7 - who cares if it's there, it's impossible to use that cell.
Then why change them? Every unused area of the fuel map was randomly adjusted, compare it to a stock one. Trademark perhaps?
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2007 | 08:36 PM
  #242  
mplspilot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,439
Likes: 1
From: Flyover country.
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
Then why change them? Every unused area of the fuel map was randomly adjusted, compare it to a stock one. Trademark perhaps?
I wonder if that's actually it!
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 06:57 AM
  #243  
bigric09's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
im sure that is it....

i trademark all the tunes i do with a few different things. Most of the major tuners do that as well.

TTP uses a 69 in the lower corner
Topspeed makes the top line a colorful blend separated by a bunch of 14.7's before the lead in to boost.
Al uses 8's and 9's all over the place except he puts them in the map areas where tuning is important
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 07:33 AM
  #244  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
I bet nobody knows what I do
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 07:48 AM
  #245  
BCOZEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 1
From: OC - SoCal
Great let me try to find my Mellon decoder ring.

Gezz....
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2007 | 07:56 AM
  #246  
Owens Racing's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Originally Posted by Mellon
I bet nobody knows what I do

Sprinkle pixie dust on the tune prior to sending it back. Magical Tunes!
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 05:30 AM
  #247  
tkklemann's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by bigric09
im sure that is it....

i trademark all the tunes i do with a few different things. Most of the major tuners do that as well.

TTP uses a 69 in the lower corner
Topspeed makes the top line a colorful blend separated by a bunch of 14.7's before the lead in to boost.
Al uses 8's and 9's all over the place except he puts them in the map areas where tuning is important


I am almost wondering if he did that on purpose, setting the timing usually more than what the car could handle so that the ECU will pull timing to get it at the correct level.

Its almost like he used the knock control to his advantage, set the timing higher than what the car could handle, use the knock control to let the ECU put the timing where it wanted/needed to be. If the timing was set to low, the ECU wouldn't up it to where it needed to be, and decrease performance.

With a timing map set to low, you would lose performance. With a timing map set to high, you would still gain performance, but the ECU is correcting it to "make it work", but it would still be faster than a timing map set to low.

Flawed logic? There is still no excuse for a fuel map like that. Highway robbery at it's best, literally and figuratively.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 06:49 AM
  #248  
bigric09's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
it makes sense, but using knock to retard timing is just that... retarded

spend the time and do your job title... Tune.

thats why i call myself an adjuster i tune a lot of people, but in the end, i call myself an adjuster
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 07:17 AM
  #249  
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
It was an _ _ tune lol!
That's what I was thinking. Trademark!
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 07:24 AM
  #250  
Mr. Evo IX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,910
Likes: 1
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by tkklemann
I am almost wondering if he did that on purpose, setting the timing usually more than what the car could handle so that the ECU will pull timing to get it at the correct level.

Its almost like he used the knock control to his advantage, set the timing higher than what the car could handle, use the knock control to let the ECU put the timing where it wanted/needed to be. If the timing was set to low, the ECU wouldn't up it to where it needed to be, and decrease performance.

With a timing map set to low, you would lose performance. With a timing map set to high, you would still gain performance, but the ECU is correcting it to "make it work", but it would still be faster than a timing map set to low.

Flawed logic? There is still no excuse for a fuel map like that. Highway robbery at it's best, literally and figuratively.
I believe that is precisely the technique he used at the time. Start the knock early and let the ECU sort it out.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 07:55 AM
  #251  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
I don't feel good about forcing a car to eat knock and push through it. I prefer to shave off the excess timing so the ECU doesn't get involved in knock control so the car is much more consistent run to run.
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #252  
bigric09's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
i dont think anyone does lol
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #253  
20psiMR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: From Vegas to Reno
Originally Posted by Mellon
I don't feel good about forcing a car to eat knock and push through it. I prefer to shave off the excess timing so the ECU doesn't get involved in knock control so the car is much more consistent run to run.
Thank you captain obvious! lol
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #254  
BCOZEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 307
Likes: 1
From: OC - SoCal
Originally Posted by honki24
I do have lean spool disabled. I have the APS dual vent BOV and leaning out when I snap off throttle helps recovery speed (when not using NLTS)

(easy answer: yeah basically it's to compensate for the VTA aspect of the APS BOV) <APS diverts and vents>
Doesnt the Tial vent in the same way? My lift off and tip in is a bit off right now, so is this method the best way to compsante for that?
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2007 | 09:13 AM
  #255  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Originally Posted by 20psiMR
Thank you captain obvious! lol
yeah I had quite a bit more in the post but took it out...sometimes I have to think twice about sharing techniques because there are some jerks on the forum that will twist your words into saying something completely different, next thing you know there's 5 other people hitting the punching bag with them. it's just not worth it sometimes.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:13 AM.