Notices

Evo X Logging

Old Nov 6, 2009 | 08:36 AM
  #841  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by SiC
Sorry, I don't know why it does that on some PCs, it works fine on my PC and my PC from work.

Just copy & paste the following into your Evoscan data.xml:

Just a few notes for USDM users of the code provided by SiC:

In the "Mode23 USA EVOX" and "Mode23 USA RA EVOX" area of EvoScan the formula for throttle positions is "(x-32)*129/255" instead of "x*100/255" Not sure why it is different, and not (yet) sure which one is correct for us to use.
All temperatures provided by SiC are in metric units. For US units use "1.8*x-40" instead of "x-40"
Speed provided by SiC is in kph. For MPH use "1.26*x" instead of "x*2"

Thanks,

Keith
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2009 | 11:33 AM
  #842  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
UPDATE:

The Manifold air temperaturelogging doesn't work on my 2010 Ralliart, but everything else provided by SiC works great!

Keith
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2009 | 07:29 PM
  #843  
FTY Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: california
awesome thanks man i will test out on the 2010 GSR tomorrow and i will get the 2010 MR rom up ASAP
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2009 | 01:13 PM
  #844  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
Just a few notes for USDM users of the code provided by SiC:

In the "Mode23 USA EVOX" and "Mode23 USA RA EVOX" area of EvoScan the formula for throttle positions is "(x-32)*129/255" instead of "x*100/255" Not sure why it is different, and not (yet) sure which one is correct for us to use.
All temperatures provided by SiC are in metric units. For US units use "1.8*x-40" instead of "x-40"
Speed provided by SiC is in kph. For MPH use "1.26*x" instead of "x*2"

Thanks,

Keith
The TPS code in the 2010 Mode23 is different than the ones in Evoscan Mode23 2008. Should we change the code from "x*100/255" to "(x-32)*129/255"?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 04:07 PM
  #845  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Is there a way to LOG MAF Volts and MAF AIRFLOW in G/S in MODE 23 USA EVO X (for a 2008)?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #846  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yes...

53040010:
MAFV:0x808f48:2:x,1023,/,5,*:1
AirFlow:0x8087d8:2:x,2,*,100,/:3

526800XX:
MAFV:0x808f50:2:x,1024,/,5,*:1
AirFlow:0x8087e0:2:x,2,*,100,/:3


Airflow for 526800xx is untested, let me know

Last edited by tephra; Nov 10, 2009 at 04:58 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 08:33 PM
  #847  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by tephra
yes...

53040010:
MAFV:0x808f48:2:x,1023,/,5,*:1
AirFlow:0x8087d8:2:x,2,*,100,/:3

526800XX:
MAFV:0x808f50:2:x,1024,/,5,*:1
AirFlow:0x8087e0:2:x,2,*,100,/:3


Airflow for 526800xx is untested, let me know
Thanks!!!

However here comes in my moment of slight knowledge deficit.

Where do I enter this information. Data edit in EVOSCAN?

Thanks!
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 08:39 PM
  #848  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
thats the format for my logger.

for evoscan just use notepad to edit the data.xml file

just copy one of the current entries (Load is a good one) and modify the address/name and Eval appropriately
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2009 | 09:57 PM
  #849  
Clipse3GT's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,185
Likes: 2
From: Cleveland, OH
Originally Posted by tephra
thats the format for my logger.

for evoscan just use notepad to edit the data.xml file

just copy one of the current entries (Load is a good one) and modify the address/name and Eval appropriately
Thanks, I didn't check out this logger yet. I hope I will have a chance to try it out tomorrow and tell if these work.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 12:24 AM
  #850  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Anyone know the request IDs for the 2010 USDM Evo X (55570005) for logging the following parameters:

LTFT- Cruise
LTFT - Idle
STFT
WGDC
WGDC Correction

Thanks a bunch

Last edited by nj1266; Dec 1, 2009 at 01:48 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 01:05 AM
  #851  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
use the MUT_TABLE and standard MUT request ID's to find them

WGDC correction wont be available.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 01:06 AM
  #852  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
use the MUT_TABLE and standard MUT request ID's to find them

WGDC correction wont be available.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 01:46 AM
  #853  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
If I knew the request IDs for logging the parameters then I would not have asked. I would simply copy the code from the 08 xml and change the request IDs to those of the 2010, save, and test the logging on a 2010 car.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 04:24 AM
  #854  
acamus's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 730
Likes: 3
From: Lattitude 48.38°, Longitude 17.58°, Altitude 146m = Slovakia, for common dude
Originally Posted by nj1266
If I knew the request IDs for logging the parameters then I would not have asked. I would simply copy the code from the 08 xml and change the request IDs to those of the 2010, save, and test the logging on a 2010 car.
For example in 55570005

MUT Table is at 3f244

now when you look at the table in Ecuflash and you know the RequestId from evowiki you can write
logging item in EvoScan.

Example:

0D LTFTMid Fuel Trim Mid (LTFT) % (x-128)/5

Request number is 0D in MUT table so you take value from MUT0x row and D column which is 804575, now you take it and write mode23 EvoScan item as 23804575 using scaling from evowiki

Hope it helps.
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2009 | 04:43 AM
  #855  
tephra's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
yes sorry NJ I should have been more specific.

once you find the MUT_TABLE (as per CT9A) you can then use that as a common reference point for most useful memory addresses

ie MUT0F is ALWAYS the STFT, so in ANY rom if you find the MUT_TABLE then you can find MUT0F easy enough. and therefore you can see the memory address for MUT0F, which will the the STFT
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:31 AM.