ECUflash before and after dyno results!
May 19, 2006, 12:05 PM
#31
Account Disabled
iTrader: (64)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by EFIxMR
Thanks for the surprise visit today Mike. It was a pleasure to meet someone involved in making this great program.
I revised my tune from when I left the shop at Gruppe-S' Dyno, the results are a much cleaner tq and hp graph with a safer tuner while maintaining similar power.
Will post results tomorrow when I get to my scanner.
On HKS cams I typically set teh gears to -4 intake -1 exhaust. This setting picks up awesome gains!
I revised my tune from when I left the shop at Gruppe-S' Dyno, the results are a much cleaner tq and hp graph with a safer tuner while maintaining similar power.
Will post results tomorrow when I get to my scanner.
On HKS cams I typically set teh gears to -4 intake -1 exhaust. This setting picks up awesome gains!
Mike
May 20, 2006, 01:10 AM
#32
Here is my baserun on the GS dyno with the same tune I had earlier from EIP's dyno.
I decided that the afrs running at mid 11's was a bit too lean, and that my graph wasn't as smooth as I liked.
I decided it would be a good time to also replace my air filter with an HKS hybrid drop in, as well as try my revised timing and fuel maps.
This is my result. The tune is much safer and made more power and tq with a smoother graph. I couldnt ask for anything more, except maybe cracking the 300 whp mark... which is really hard to do on this dyno with a stock turbo and pump gas. I guess my car is setup for more tq than hp. I don't think many people have done over 300 tq on this dyno with pump either.
Here is an afr readout of the same run.
These runs were done in 3rd gear for comparison purposes, I tuned my car in 4th which ran 11.1 straight across in the same manner on this same tune. Running it in 3rd makes a bit more power all else the same, but run's a bit leaner.
This is what my car made bone stock on the same dyno when I first picked it up, to give you an idea of how much gains we are actually talking about here. The dynos in the bay area are much like Buschurs which read low compared to dynojet.
The dynojet equivalent of 300 whp on this dyno is about 350-360 whp. As compared to ATP's awd dynojet.
Last edited by EFIxMR; May 20, 2006 at 01:23 AM.
May 20, 2006, 06:32 AM
#35
nice numbers...
you look like you are in the ballpark we were....
our 05 MR did 207/236 stock on a mustang...
with our utec tuning and turboback with fmic at 21 psi we did 286/306... so i hope we can achieve similar numbers with the ecuflash on similarly modded cars...
we have a mustang AWD dyno going in the floor of our shop in about 1.5 months...
im going to try the ecuflash with our 2.3 for pump gas, and probably run the UTEC for race fuel and alky
cheers
cb
you look like you are in the ballpark we were....
our 05 MR did 207/236 stock on a mustang...
with our utec tuning and turboback with fmic at 21 psi we did 286/306... so i hope we can achieve similar numbers with the ecuflash on similarly modded cars...
we have a mustang AWD dyno going in the floor of our shop in about 1.5 months...
im going to try the ecuflash with our 2.3 for pump gas, and probably run the UTEC for race fuel and alky
cheers
cb
May 20, 2006, 06:42 AM
#36
Thats the one thing that sucks about street tuning, my "Street dyno" numbers match my trap times fairly well (obviously derived from that anyway) but they don't really give me an apple to apples comparison to other people's numbers.. not that it matters much anyway.
May 20, 2006, 06:57 AM
#37
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
EFIxMR -
Very nice gains - goes to show the fine tuning capabilities. Two quick questions.
1. What are you using for datalogging when tuning?
2. Is the dyno using an RPM pickup or is that the Mustang dyno "RPM guesstimate?"
Very nice gains - goes to show the fine tuning capabilities. Two quick questions.
1. What are you using for datalogging when tuning?
2. Is the dyno using an RPM pickup or is that the Mustang dyno "RPM guesstimate?"
May 20, 2006, 07:28 AM
#38
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
Thats the one thing that sucks about street tuning, my "Street dyno" numbers match my trap times fairly well (obviously derived from that anyway) but they don't really give me an apple to apples comparison to other people's numbers.. not that it matters much anyway.
what matters is... how fast is your compared to how you want it... right?
cb
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrfred
ECU Flash
268
Feb 26, 2022 06:16 PM
