Notices
ECU Flash

Ecu reading from 120-140 load table in High Boost!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2006, 04:03 AM
  #1  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (171)
 
elhalisf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ecu reading from 120-140 load table in High Boost!

My friend and I did some data logging today to see how Al’s modified tune would turn out to be. I had significantly changed it by leaning out mid range and a much more gradual decrease of advance timing throughout the high loads and rpm’s. The lower timing map was the original one, which I set as the low octane for now, and the above one is the one I modified set as high octane.

http://www.mecah.com/timing.jpg

Well going though the data logs, the advance timing was from 19-22 degrees as average and high 20’s, low 30’s in the very high rpm’s. Lowest was 16 degrees. When I compare those numbers with my timing map, it puts me right in between the 120 to 140 load range! Is that possible? Is that why Al set the ignition numbers in the140+ load range the same?

Now, please don’t ask me how I know this, but I was getting zero knock counts most of the time. In one pull, at low rpm turbo spool up, I experienced 4 counts of knock for about 500 rpm’s where the timing was still 16+. In other small spots, I would get 1-2 knock counts for about 200 rpm’s or so. Timing would still be 19+ degrees.



A simple way to fix this is to have the timing the same from the 120- 260 load range, but I don’t want to do that. How can I get the ecu to read the 240-260 load range? what could be wrong?

Old Jun 23, 2006, 04:18 AM
  #2  
Evolved Member
 
jcsbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I posted a similar finding recently on a stock JDM GSR IX ECU with an AVC-R, 3" TBE and Walbro pump. There was no clear answer.

I don't feel it is right to have a whole range of load cells running the same timing, it makes no sense at all. However, it might be pragmatic when you don't know which cells it is hitting.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 05:18 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Mad_SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well,

I'm not sure about this so hopefully jack or someone will chime in and correct me if I am wrong but....

I THINK the highest load point will occur at peak torque and then fall off from there, so as you move up the rpm range (down the map) the load value will get lower (moving left on the map).

The map has to account for the highest possible load point so you end up will unused load cells at higher rpm's.

You could play with the maf scaling to get the ecu to think you are in a higher load point but what is the point. Just setup your timing map so you can easily trace the path through the load cells and adjust from there.

Once you hit peak torque you want to sustain that torque as long as you can since power ultimatley comes from torque. If the torque curve is flat in a particular region you propably do not need to ramp up timing much in that reagion and there is a point where additional timing does not net you additional power or torque.

That said, I don't think the values should just be flat filled but should (like you said) have some ramp to them. But without putting your hands on the actual car, you kinda have to go with "safe" values since every car is unique. Hence the reason Al say these are good starting points.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 05:57 AM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Yes, what mad said is correct.

The load numbers are roughly proportinal to mass airflow/revolution, commonly logged as g/rev. This peaks at peak toprque and falls off from there. So, at peak torque you will be at the highest load cells, but depending on you car and your mods and the VE at high RPM, your g/rev may drop significantly at higher RPMs.

This was very easy to see in DSMLink, as you could log g/rev. For a DSM, if you were over 2.1 g/rev. it would use the highest load column in the timing map, and for a highly modified car at high boost, it always stayed abouve 2.1 g/rev, even at high RPM. But, at lower boost, it could very well drop below the 2.1 mark at higher RPMs, which made the timing and fueling use the lower load columns.


Eric
Old Jun 23, 2006, 06:37 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
modvp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So how safe is it to run 8-10° of timing at peak torque? I guess it would be a good idea to not set both the high oct and low oct maps the same.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 06:39 AM
  #6  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
ScrappyJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by elhalisf
My friend and I did some data logging today to see how Al’s modified tune would turn out to be.
You said you were logging knock and timing. Can you also log boost (or another load value) and TPS? That way, you can compare your RPM vs load to better give you an idea where you are on the map at any given time and rule out the extremely high timing and extremely low boost being during lift-throttle. You didn't mention what boost you are running, or the shape of your boost curve that I saw.

I would be very surprised to find your car actually falling all the way to 120 - 140 KPA (~4-6 PSI) while still under WOT conditions.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 08:50 AM
  #7  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Noogles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: So. Cal (LA County)
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
usually 8 degrees is the max you want to run on pump gas race gas might allow for 1-2 more degrees but isn't recomended because of the incredibly high cylinder pressure.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 10:48 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
taenaive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chantilly,VA
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It must be the case of low boost. and your car is as slow as Honda civic.
Seriously, check your boost! there is no way hitting 16 in the mid with the decent amount of boost.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 10:51 AM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Noogles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: So. Cal (LA County)
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1. What are you using to log?
2. What map is on the bottom?

post a log file so i can take a look at it.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 11:51 AM
  #10  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (5)
 
MalibuJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Royse City, TX
Posts: 10,569
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
The column values aren't really a true measure of boost.. Just a rough calculation so if you consider RPM, Your Mods (hence why some aftermarket intakes are bad), weight of the car, Boost levels (And taper) you very well could end up in a much lower cell.. Other things such as the GEAR the car is loaded in, and whatnot...

Calculated load is just that, a calculated load value, it can go up or down due to a number of factors..
Old Jun 23, 2006, 01:04 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (171)
 
elhalisf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScrappyJack
You said you were logging knock and timing. Can you also log boost (or another load value) and TPS? That way, you can compare your RPM vs load to better give you an idea where you are on the map at any given time and rule out the extremely high timing and extremely low boost being during lift-throttle. You didn't mention what boost you are running, or the shape of your boost curve that I saw.

I would be very surprised to find your car actually falling all the way to 120 - 140 KPA (~4-6 PSI) while still under WOT conditions.
all the logs that i have done where at 100% TPS. i can log boost using a 3.5 bar sensor, but i have to use the zeitronix. however, i have verified that my autometer gauge is fairly accurate. after i had uploaded the modified ignition map (the one above), the car felt unbelievably fast. i mean hella fast!!!!. it would build up boost sooooo much quicker and the boost kick was more gradual.

Originally Posted by Noogles
usually 8 degrees is the max you want to run on pump gas race gas might allow for 1-2 more degrees but isn't recomended because of the incredibly high cylinder pressure.
so with high advance timing, i have the chance of spinning a rod even when i am detecting no knock?

Originally Posted by taenaive
It must be the case of low boost. and your car is as slow as Honda civic.
Seriously, check your boost! there is no way hitting 16 in the mid with the decent amount of boost.
i know, thats what i first said to my self. i would know if the car is not boosting 22psi.

Originally Posted by Noogles
1. What are you using to log?
2. What map is on the bottom?

post a log file so i can take a look at it.
you can download the excel file here.
www.mecah.com/log.xls
those where 5 pulls on 100% TPS.
here is one thing i realize. the max Air flow Hz is maxed at 1603.95 hz! how can i be maxing out the maf this soon??

Last edited by elhalisf; Jun 23, 2006 at 01:07 PM.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 01:29 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Mad_SB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Something does not look right with those logs... If the knock count was accurate, the timing would be getting pulled. and if the timing values were that high I would think you would be knocking a lot more...
Old Jun 23, 2006, 01:31 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (171)
 
elhalisf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it takes 3 knock counts to pull 1 degree of timing. it does seem to be pulling timing a bit.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 03:05 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
taenaive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chantilly,VA
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the autometer guage is known to read 5 psi higher than other guages.
Old Jun 23, 2006, 03:08 PM
  #15  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
ScrappyJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by elhalisf
all the logs that i have done where at 100% TPS. i can log boost using a 3.5 bar sensor, but i have to use the zeitronix. however, i have verified that my autometer gauge is fairly accurate.
What are you using to log the RPM, Knock, Timing information that you included in that spreadsheet? I asked about boost because, though it is not the actual value used for load, it has been pretty close in my (albeit limited) experience. I highly doubt you can memorize enough useful data points (i.e. boost at RPM) while also driving.


Quick Reply: Ecu reading from 120-140 load table in High Boost!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:05 AM.