Highest whp on stock ECU
Aug 8, 2008, 12:47 AM
#62
Its really odd how that one works.
You can take 2 identical motors, set the up with piston to wall thats .003-.004 and it will sound like a diesel when its running and then take and set up a looser motor at .005-.006 and its as quiet as stock.
Then on top of it neither seem to make any knock that you wouldnt expect under WOT, but will part throttle knock like a son of a gun.
dunno, but sometimes I really wish the knock was load definable and rpm definable.
Aug 8, 2008, 06:42 AM
#63
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its really odd how that one works.
You can take 2 identical motors, set the up with piston to wall thats .003-.004 and it will sound like a diesel when its running and then take and set up a looser motor at .005-.006 and its as quiet as stock.
Then on top of it neither seem to make any knock that you wouldnt expect under WOT, but will part throttle knock like a son of a gun.
dunno, but sometimes I really wish the knock was load definable and rpm definable.
You can take 2 identical motors, set the up with piston to wall thats .003-.004 and it will sound like a diesel when its running and then take and set up a looser motor at .005-.006 and its as quiet as stock.
Then on top of it neither seem to make any knock that you wouldnt expect under WOT, but will part throttle knock like a son of a gun.
dunno, but sometimes I really wish the knock was load definable and rpm definable.
Have you ever tried playing with the knock filters?
Oct 31, 2008, 09:23 PM
#65
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
bringing this thread back...
93 octane, no meth, alky or water etc..
stock ecu and mas with full honeycomb glued in
full weight car with tools in the trunk
10.41 @ 135 should be over 600awhp
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=378737
93 octane, no meth, alky or water etc..
stock ecu and mas with full honeycomb glued in
full weight car with tools in the trunk
10.41 @ 135 should be over 600awhp
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=378737
Nov 1, 2008, 06:11 AM
#67
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its really odd how that one works.
You can take 2 identical motors, set the up with piston to wall thats .003-.004 and it will sound like a diesel when its running and then take and set up a looser motor at .005-.006 and its as quiet as stock.
Then on top of it neither seem to make any knock that you wouldnt expect under WOT, but will part throttle knock like a son of a gun.
dunno, but sometimes I really wish the knock was load definable and rpm definable.
You can take 2 identical motors, set the up with piston to wall thats .003-.004 and it will sound like a diesel when its running and then take and set up a looser motor at .005-.006 and its as quiet as stock.
Then on top of it neither seem to make any knock that you wouldnt expect under WOT, but will part throttle knock like a son of a gun.
dunno, but sometimes I really wish the knock was load definable and rpm definable.
Nov 1, 2008, 06:31 AM
#69
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
just looked at the mod list....850cc injectors and SAFCII
http://www.mooremaxperformance.com/2003_evo_viii.htm
Last edited by Mellon Racing; Nov 1, 2008 at 06:35 AM.
Nov 1, 2008, 08:44 AM
#72
It sounds like you want to just enjoy your recent investment in parts. Sure not getting 100 percent out of it is not cool but you can drive it with a more conservative tune on the stock ecu and maf and then wait/save until you can get a stand alone. buying a possible temporary solution will just cost more in the end. If it were me I would run what I have knowing it will be limited possibly and then save my pennies and buy a solution that is known to work. AEM would be ECU of choice simply due to the raw numbers of evo's that have successfullyl run it,the numbers of tuners available and the feedback you could receive based on others experiences
Grats on the build and good luck
Grats on the build and good luck
Last edited by oldevodude; Nov 1, 2008 at 08:53 AM.
Nov 1, 2008, 09:21 AM
#73
Everyone is so quick to burn money on that damn AEM. Read up on where they are with the stock ECU, you'll be amazed how quickly its catching up to the AEM Pro. Mellon already has an AEM Pro sitting in his garage too but I don't think he'll need it anytime soon.
Nov 10, 2008, 06:34 PM
#75
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The other nice thing about the stock ecu is that you have to actually try to hurt a motor with it. Well that is until you redo the code in it such that the knock sensor is ignored and you jack the timing up all the while experiencing a fuel pump failure. Ask me how I know.
http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/m...incylinder.jpg
http://i298.photobucket.com/albums/m...incylinder.jpg
Last edited by dan l; Nov 10, 2008 at 06:36 PM.
