Notices
ECU Flash

how-to: control closed loop AFR with your wideband O2 system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 24, 2008, 06:06 PM
  #31  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
dudical26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
well your formula is defintiely wrong there. I'll see what I can do with the data though.
hold off, I think I got it working, post back after a quick drive
Old Sep 24, 2008, 06:19 PM
  #32  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
dudical26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well it seems were back in the same place I started, tweaking the formula again to adjust for ground offset by changing from 9.6 to 9.4 gets me as close as I can get.

I guess its good enough for controlling closed loop cruise but not ideal for serious tuning.
Old Sep 24, 2008, 06:27 PM
  #33  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Use the formula I posted in my last post, not the 9.4 crap lol. Its the most accurate you'll get with the ZT-2 analog.

Last edited by Jack_of_Trades; Sep 24, 2008 at 06:35 PM.
Old Sep 24, 2008, 06:59 PM
  #34  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
dudical26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used that formula but on average the reading was high by .2 throughout the entire log. I lowered the offset to 9.4 which has made the readings more accurate. Must be because of ground offset.
Old Sep 24, 2008, 07:11 PM
  #35  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
You used this formula eval="((x*0.01895)*2)+9.6"and it was still off by .2AFR?? Thats odd, according to your entirrrre log it should be dead on for the most part. Can you do another log using that formula so I can take a look? I did notice oddball spots where it was off as much as .7AFR but thats where the analog noise and EMF comes into play.
Old Sep 24, 2008, 07:25 PM
  #36  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
If you look at dudical26's first AFR log that he posted, there is no consistent offset between the serial out AFR and the analog out AFR as read by the ECU. In general, it looks as if the analog out lags slightly behind the serial out. At any rate, the formula that dudical26 is using looks to be the best for his setup.
Old Sep 24, 2008, 07:32 PM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
dudical26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you guys think this would be close enough for use in replacing front and rear 02 signal?

When I tune I will use serial logging though. The analog feed will be convenient when we are finally able to log with openport 2.0 then I can log AFR to SD card without a lappy
Old Sep 24, 2008, 08:13 PM
  #38  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by dudical26
Do you guys think this would be close enough for use in replacing front and rear 02 signal?

When I tune I will use serial logging though. The analog feed will be convenient when we are finally able to log with openport 2.0 then I can log AFR to SD card without a lappy
Its fine for closed loop cruise. I wouldn't think once about it.
Old Sep 25, 2008, 05:23 AM
  #39  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
dudical26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
alright cool, that means it's time to deploy this closed loop patch.
Old Sep 25, 2008, 06:23 AM
  #40  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
travman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last night I got the ZT2 pretty darn close to the serial......let me know if you think something is off or im doing something wrong.

I used (19.6-9.6)/255 = .03922

Plugged it in as .03922*x + 9.6....it was about .1 afr off so I change the 9.6 to 9.7 and its very close. Final equation was .03922*x + 9.7, I have mine grounded to the metal shroud behind the glove box where the ecu is.

I am within .1-.2 at cruise which to me is more than fine....so tonight I will plug in the ML/BL and see how she works. Thanks for all the help guys....

This would be what I plug in, correct?

ML, 1/.03922 = 25.5

BL/ML, 9.7/.03922 = 247.32
Old Sep 25, 2008, 06:34 AM
  #41  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
As long as you get it close enough in the 14.0-16.0 range you should be fine. Whenever you datalog just use the USB digital signal.
Old Sep 25, 2008, 08:00 AM
  #42  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
travman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
As long as you get it close enough in the 14.0-16.0 range you should be fine. Whenever you datalog just use the USB digital signal.
Yeah that's what I have always done (even with the LC-1)....I use the serial cable to tune with and check if i want a accurate reading. I use the analog for wideband control and when im to lazy to plug the serial in and just want to ball park where I am AFR wise......
Old Sep 25, 2008, 08:25 AM
  #43  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by travman
...

This would be what I plug in, correct?

ML, 1/.03922 = 25.5

BL/ML, 9.7/.03922 = 247.32
You got it.
Old Sep 25, 2008, 10:05 AM
  #44  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
travman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just tried it during lunch......car starts fine, starts to idle at 14.7 then immediately goes leaner and leaner.....it went to 20.1 and the car started to die so I shut it off, will just flash back to stock O2.

I dont understand? Im using the linear wire....the #'s log fine when comparing the analog to serial on the stock front O2, very close.

But something is missing to make this work....cause its not working

Here is the linear graph from zietronix website: http://www.zeitronix.com/Products/zt...bandoutput.htm

Last edited by travman; Sep 25, 2008 at 11:11 AM.
Old Sep 25, 2008, 12:43 PM
  #45  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
dudical26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how long did it take for the car to go from 14.7 to 20?

I know that the zeitronix will not spit out any readings for the first 30 seconds while it "warms up" wonder if this is causing an issue during startup?


Quick Reply: how-to: control closed loop AFR with your wideband O2 system



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:02 PM.