Load dropping off
#1
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ft. walton beach, FLORIDA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Load dropping off
Ok im having a little problem here. I just got my new motor broken in and
started tuning my pump gas map. Im hitting 330 load and then it drops all the way to 170.
Ive fixed all my boost leaks and my boost is holding solid. Ive done a compression test and its just under 200 across. Im running a gt35r and a gm maf. Do you think it could be the maf giving me these problems? Before this motor my load would stay pegged till 9000 rpms. Any ideas would be great.
-nick
started tuning my pump gas map. Im hitting 330 load and then it drops all the way to 170.
Ive fixed all my boost leaks and my boost is holding solid. Ive done a compression test and its just under 200 across. Im running a gt35r and a gm maf. Do you think it could be the maf giving me these problems? Before this motor my load would stay pegged till 9000 rpms. Any ideas would be great.
-nick
#2
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That is expected behavior. As RPM increases - for the same airflow - load will drop.
Load = ( airflow ) / ( RPM *2 )
(since there's two rotations per intake cycle)
Typically load will very closely follow your torque peak.
Remember that load is the amount of air per cylinder charge. So if you had 2000 #/hr (33.3 #/min) airflow at 3000 RPM, that same airflow at 6000 RPM would be exactly half. (33 #/min is roughly ~300-330 HP.)
If you are attempting to "flatten" out the load values in the higher RPM range, you will need to drastically increase the boost levels as RPM increases to get more airflow (which is not always proportional to boost pressure).
Load = ( airflow ) / ( RPM *2 )
(since there's two rotations per intake cycle)
Typically load will very closely follow your torque peak.
Remember that load is the amount of air per cylinder charge. So if you had 2000 #/hr (33.3 #/min) airflow at 3000 RPM, that same airflow at 6000 RPM would be exactly half. (33 #/min is roughly ~300-330 HP.)
If you are attempting to "flatten" out the load values in the higher RPM range, you will need to drastically increase the boost levels as RPM increases to get more airflow (which is not always proportional to boost pressure).
#6
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ft. walton beach, FLORIDA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But any ways my load is acting really funky now, im only hitting mid 200s
Trending Topics
#9
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your recorded airflow values are reasonably flat from 6K to 9K so while RPM climbs ~33%, load also drops off about the same amount so the calculations (by the ECU) appear to be very close.
Yes - you need more airflow in the upper RPM range. If those airflow values are in pounds per hour, your airflow seems lower than I would expect. How much power is this engine making? That airflow (again if the values are in #/hr) is just a bit under 300.
Yes - you need more airflow in the upper RPM range. If those airflow values are in pounds per hour, your airflow seems lower than I would expect. How much power is this engine making? That airflow (again if the values are in #/hr) is just a bit under 300.
#10
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ft. walton beach, FLORIDA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont know how much power im making but something isnt right for sure. My car just feels like it has no top end.
The last time I was at the 1/8th mile track I ran a 7.3 @ 96 mph on low boost and 7.1 @ 101 mph on high boost.
The last time I was at the 1/8th mile track I ran a 7.3 @ 96 mph on low boost and 7.1 @ 101 mph on high boost.
#11
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
You sure you didn't change the MAFT settings due to bigger injectors with your new motor or something like that? What is your boost during that pull, from start to finish?
Since you are using a MAFT/GM MAF, I would suspect the issue lies there.
Q15H - the airflow numbers are Hz, not any mass airflow.
Since you are using a MAFT/GM MAF, I would suspect the issue lies there.
Q15H - the airflow numbers are Hz, not any mass airflow.
#12
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ft. walton beach, FLORIDA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes im positive I havnt changed anything, I just started trying to tune it today. Everything on the motor is the same as before its just built now.
boost is 26-27 all the way.
Im going to see if I can find a new gm maf and see if that helps
boost is 26-27 all the way.
Im going to see if I can find a new gm maf and see if that helps
#13
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Do you think maybe because its a fresh motor with perfect compression, leak down, etc. That its making better power and maybe you need to just lower the timing and see if that helps ?
I swear I went through I similar situation. But it could also be your maf so maybe not.
But good luck.
I swear I went through I similar situation. But it could also be your maf so maybe not.
But good luck.
#14
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ft. walton beach, FLORIDA
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I definitely don't think thats the problem, My old motor had perfect compression too tho btw.
Im leaning towards the maf or MAFT. I should have a new Maf tomorrow to throw on and test out.
Im leaning towards the maf or MAFT. I should have a new Maf tomorrow to throw on and test out.