Notices
ECU Flash

Links to jcsbanks' Speed Density patches

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2009, 10:23 AM
  #46  
Evolved Member
 
jcsbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by japanevo
just started reading through the SD first test post and still have a long way to go, so i am hoping this isnt adressed there but. i was looking at the rom in ecuflash and something doesnt look right. four maps show "xxxx" and looks like random data.
The xxx is OK, these are programming tables.

What is not OK on the screenshot is your endian. You need to change it from little to big for the MAP VE table and its scalings if you are using later than Ecuflash 1.29a.
Old Apr 28, 2009, 06:34 PM
  #47  
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
dcshoeco16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MD
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is anyone working on a 96530006 version? I have everything except the patch and it is kinda frustrating.. SD seems to have taken a back burner to Live mapping
Old Apr 29, 2009, 03:29 AM
  #48  
Evolved Member
 
jcsbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I've only done SD for JDM/UK ECUs because of difficulties with testing ECUs for other markets and OBD differences. The same ideas should work though.
Old Apr 29, 2009, 05:56 AM
  #49  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dcshoeco16
Is anyone working on a 96530006 version? I have everything except the patch and it is kinda frustrating.. SD seems to have taken a back burner to Live mapping
I think mrfred was just about to do this a while back untill he got sidetracked on a few other big projects.

I, too, would love an SD patch for this ROM. Maybe ask mrfred about it or perhaps he responds here if he reads it. From what I understood, you will need to first at least have the MAT fuel temp patch and have the boost logging in place.

I will be happy to take a look at a patched versus non patched ROM for some other ROM and see if I can compare it to 96530006, but I doubt I will be able to port it over. I think I remember mrfred saying that's it pretty complex.


Eric
Old Apr 29, 2009, 07:04 AM
  #50  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
PVD04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
I think mrfred was just about to do this a while back untill he got sidetracked on a few other big projects.

I, too, would love an SD patch for this ROM. Maybe ask mrfred about it or perhaps he responds here if he reads it. From what I understood, you will need to first at least have the MAT fuel temp patch and have the boost logging in place.

I will be happy to take a look at a patched versus non patched ROM for some other ROM and see if I can compare it to 96530006, but I doubt I will be able to port it over. I think I remember mrfred saying that's it pretty complex.


Eric
Instead of doing the MAT fuel temp patch, you can also wire the MAT sensor into the stock AIT wiring and keep the air temp compensation the same as stock. This is how I'm doing it.
Old Apr 29, 2009, 07:14 AM
  #51  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
MR Turco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,233
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
great thread, i am not sure how i missed this.
Old Apr 29, 2009, 07:26 AM
  #52  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by PVD04
Instead of doing the MAT fuel temp patch, you can also wire the MAT sensor into the stock AIT wiring and keep the air temp compensation the same as stock. This is how I'm doing it.
That's good to know and I think I may have asked that a while back. I'm sure the SD patch will have to be slightly different depending on where the MAT temp input is coming from.
Old Apr 29, 2009, 07:44 AM
  #53  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
MR Turco's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,233
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by PVD04
Instead of doing the MAT fuel temp patch, you can also wire the MAT sensor into the stock AIT wiring and keep the air temp compensation the same as stock. This is how I'm doing it.
wouldn't you need the same sensor type though?
Old Apr 29, 2009, 07:49 AM
  #54  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
PVD04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
That's good to know and I think I may have asked that a while back. I'm sure the SD patch will have to be slightly different depending on where the MAT temp input is coming from.
If you look at one of the other ROMs that are posted you will see that there is a field called "SD Convert IAT to MAT (0x03 -> 0x0E)", if you leave it as 03 it will continue to log through the MAF input.
Old Apr 29, 2009, 07:49 AM
  #55  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
PVD04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MR Turco
wouldn't you need the same sensor type though?
My logged temps appear to be about the same using this method, so it seems the sensors output is roughly the same.
Old Apr 29, 2009, 10:03 PM
  #56  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by PVD04
My logged temps appear to be about the same using this method, so it seems the sensors output is roughly the same.
The stock IAT sensor and the GM IAT sensor have similar output only over a narrow temperature range. If reading the GM IAT over the IAT ADC input, the IAT scaling needs to be updated. I'm pretty sure I posted the scaling somewhere.
Old May 10, 2009, 06:22 AM
  #57  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
evo8dad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Sellersville, PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mr Fred what do we need to do to get you working on a 96530006 ROM?? Perhaps some bribery would help move things along
Old May 10, 2009, 06:34 AM
  #58  
Evolved Member
 
jcsbanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,399
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Yes, bribe mrfred to do it! I was talked into it by Eric when I realised 94170015 was already done, and I've copied mrfred's schema and was about to start doing it for 9653, but it is rather different to the method I used on the JDM ROMs so I haven't been able to get to it yet...
Old May 10, 2009, 06:52 AM
  #59  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by evo8dad
Mr Fred what do we need to do to get you working on a 96530006 ROM?? Perhaps some bribery would help move things along
I'm in the middle of disassembling the ISCV control routines. PM me to discuss bribery proposal. :-)
Old May 10, 2009, 07:25 AM
  #60  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
l2r99gst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Let me know what the bribery talks finalize on. I may be willing to support the cause.


Quick Reply: Links to jcsbanks' Speed Density patches



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:08 AM.