Notices
ECU Flash

stock mas limit finally found?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2009, 02:21 PM
  #1  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
stock mas limit finally found?

some of you may have been following my progress, I've recently dyno'd the car at 700awhp on a dynojet and with increases in boost from 38psi to 45psi, only lower rpm torque increases a little, not the high rpm horsepower, a sign that there is a choke point. Increasing timing also does not make a significant improvement.

I'm interested in going with SD or a MAF-T to answer the question once and for all, how much horsepower can you make on the stock MAS.

If someone has a MAF-T intake setup I could borrow I'd be willing to spend some time dialing the tune back in and seeing if it helps reduce the restriction enough to increase the horsepower. I figure that's the quickest way to get the answer and to see if SD experimentation on the stock ECU is worthwhile for a car at this level.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 02:48 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
03whitegsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,001
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Any logs? Just curious what the 2-Byte maf frequency looks like.

700 HP through that little guy is impressive. The gains of getting rid of it may be even more impressive though.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 03:09 PM
  #3  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
0xDEAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: central pa
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I've seen 8's out of a GM MAS setup.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 03:22 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Actually I already did the math for your car, at 38psi with no MAF it should be worth about 40-45whp. This is based on a car that is not octane limited at xx boost. Like 0xDEAD said, there are plenty of DSMs running around 750-800+ (I think of Hal Landry) with a 3" GM. DSM25psi made 762 on a Mustang (for what thats worth compared to a DJ) so there is plenty to be had.

I would switch to SD and get it over with, its the easiest overall since all you change is the tune and a MAP sensor vs having to do a different upper pipe. I imagine if you were going to leave it drawthrough you might gain some but not as much as blow through.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 04:05 PM
  #5  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I didn't think SD was ready for this kind of boost
Old Aug 31, 2009, 04:06 PM
  #6  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
Any logs? Just curious what the 2-Byte maf frequency looks like.

700 HP through that little guy is impressive. The gains of getting rid of it may be even more impressive though.
I don't log airflow, don't need it for tuning.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 04:23 PM
  #7  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
0xDEAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: central pa
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning
I didn't think SD was ready for this kind of boost

Well its kinda ready for any boost level any engine can take. SD works on MAP sensor voltage. How you tell evoscan to represent that voltage in the map is up to you and your skills. I know a couple places that sell 100psia MAP sensors. So as long as you can keep it below 85psi you should be ok. If you need to run more boost let me know and I'll help you source a larger sensor.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 04:27 PM
  #8  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Roadspike was saying something about the 5bar pressure sensor not being sorted out yet with the stock ecu...maybe he'll chime in on that obstacle.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 04:39 PM
  #9  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
RoadSpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning
Roadspike was saying something about the 5bar pressure sensor not being sorted out yet with the stock ecu...maybe he'll chime in on that obstacle.
Its sorted for the most part I simply atm have slight tunning issues at the low load and rpm end of the spectrum where the gradiants for VE are the highest. Right now i have a slightly rich cruise issue at about 50-60 load. Nothing a few tweaks of the map and RPM VE wont sort out over time.

I'm sticking to a more 1:1 map kPa vs load rather than the scaling your car is doing where 300kPa would have been more like 360 load. In the end your load will go down on this rom so you don't have to scale it out so high. If you want its easy enough to change the load value to something more like your car is tuned with already.

I'll give you my rom setup for the 5 bar if you want chris just shoot me an email in pm. You're going to have to sort out the VE on your own car anyways since with the big head and turbo its going to be more efficient than my personal car.

Notables:
Car uses a 5 bar kalvico sensor good up to 58psi
This car hooks the air temp sensor to the fuel temp sensor for easier change out in case you want to go back for some reason.

Shoot me an email or call me Rob can give you my number.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 04:41 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
RoadSpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Oh one more thing I was planning on implementing boost control on the stock ECU as well but i still need the help of MrFred for one scaling item.

Rock on
Old Aug 31, 2009, 04:54 PM
  #11  
Evolved Member
 
leecavturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 1,392
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i wonder if you could run 2 map sensors those of you running big boost
with some sort of code to use the high resolution 2.5 or 3 bar for loads below 100 and then switch to the 5-6bar above?
Old Aug 31, 2009, 05:00 PM
  #12  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
interesting, I'm not too hung up on my scaling staying the same, I can adjust my timing/fuel maps as needed if it's off.

where are people getting the 5 bar kalvico sensor and cost?

can you elaborate on the iat sensor details?

I'm not interested in stock ecu controlled boost right now, maybe later.

my email is chris@mellontuning.com if you want to shoot that ROM over. another obstacle will be getting away from my beloved 96940011 ROM, I bet it's not supported.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 05:08 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
03whitegsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 4,001
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning
I don't log airflow, don't need it for tuning.
Might be worth logging just to see what it's doing. It would show if it's a physical limit on airflow or an electrical limit. You may already be well past the electrical limit and just be tuning around it.
Old Aug 31, 2009, 05:12 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mellon Tuning
where are people getting the 5 bar kalvico sensor and cost?
Here is one source:

http://www.zeitronix.com/order/order.htm#MAP50
Old Aug 31, 2009, 05:12 PM
  #15  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I've seen the airflow data before on my car, it looks normal, just saying I haven't done it recently or continually.


Quick Reply: stock mas limit finally found?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:37 PM.