launch maps
Oct 18, 2009, 07:39 PM
#16
Evolving Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Creston, Iowa
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oct 18, 2009, 08:35 PM
#17
Actually this was a feature in V6.
My main interest is building boost and then transitioning to the main maps without tons of knock that would affect timing post launch.
Nice to see this thread has gotten some interest now. I'll post mine after I log results from it to compare.
My main interest is building boost and then transitioning to the main maps without tons of knock that would affect timing post launch.
Nice to see this thread has gotten some interest now. I'll post mine after I log results from it to compare.
Oct 18, 2009, 09:15 PM
#18
If a stock power Evo can spin the tires... what would a big power Evo do with a ton of boost out of the hole? Isn't traction the issue for most people, not more power?
I've always dialed in NO ignition retard on my launch control settings with my autronic sm4 our of fear of breaking drivetrain parts. I get 1.6's with a 1.5 here and there. I even use a relay to my boost control solenoid to get less boost before a certain vehicle speed. So wanting to leave from 0 mph with a ton of boost seems odd to me. I'm sure if the drivetrain holds together and your on slicks and a well prep'd track you might cut a 1.3 or sumpin but is it worth the harrasment unless your a shop car?
I've always dialed in NO ignition retard on my launch control settings with my autronic sm4 our of fear of breaking drivetrain parts. I get 1.6's with a 1.5 here and there. I even use a relay to my boost control solenoid to get less boost before a certain vehicle speed. So wanting to leave from 0 mph with a ton of boost seems odd to me. I'm sure if the drivetrain holds together and your on slicks and a well prep'd track you might cut a 1.3 or sumpin but is it worth the harrasment unless your a shop car?
Oct 18, 2009, 09:39 PM
#19
Registered User
If a stock power Evo can spin the tires... what would a big power Evo do with a ton of boost out of the hole? Isn't traction the issue for most people, not more power?
I've always dialed in NO ignition retard on my launch control settings with my autronic sm4 our of fear of breaking drivetrain parts. I get 1.6's with a 1.5 here and there. I even use a relay to my boost control solenoid to get less boost before a certain vehicle speed. So wanting to leave from 0 mph with a ton of boost seems odd to me. I'm sure if the drivetrain holds together and your on slicks and a well prep'd track you might cut a 1.3 or sumpin but is it worth the harrasment unless your a shop car?
I've always dialed in NO ignition retard on my launch control settings with my autronic sm4 our of fear of breaking drivetrain parts. I get 1.6's with a 1.5 here and there. I even use a relay to my boost control solenoid to get less boost before a certain vehicle speed. So wanting to leave from 0 mph with a ton of boost seems odd to me. I'm sure if the drivetrain holds together and your on slicks and a well prep'd track you might cut a 1.3 or sumpin but is it worth the harrasment unless your a shop car?
that video is hilarious! only in the caribbean!!!!
i want to test this - negative timing VS standard timing (8-10*)
some people say the retard is better others say the other.
i need V7 to test though i hate the knock the settings generate!
Oct 19, 2009, 04:57 AM
#21
Evolved Member
i realy need a new turbo... i hate this stock t25..
Oct 20, 2009, 10:41 AM
#22
Oct 20, 2009, 12:09 PM
#23
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hurlburt Field, FL
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually this was a feature in V6.
My main interest is building boost and then transitioning to the main maps without tons of knock that would affect timing post launch.
Nice to see this thread has gotten some interest now. I'll post mine after I log results from it to compare.
My main interest is building boost and then transitioning to the main maps without tons of knock that would affect timing post launch.
Nice to see this thread has gotten some interest now. I'll post mine after I log results from it to compare.
Oct 20, 2009, 03:49 PM
#25
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder if the recover time is in a table somewhere. If we could lessen the time it waits before resuming power again I bet we could get some nasty boost quick!
On another note if I just get on the 2-step and then let off without launching my idle will stumble for a bit. It drops maybe 200rpm or so for about 10 seconds. My launch maps are identical below 3500rpm. With V7 that is.
On another note if I just get on the 2-step and then let off without launching my idle will stumble for a bit. It drops maybe 200rpm or so for about 10 seconds. My launch maps are identical below 3500rpm. With V7 that is.
Oct 20, 2009, 09:48 PM
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
To change the entire map wouldn't allow for smooth transition in fuel and timing. I believe that by doing that you may induce knock.
Remember....RPM has to increase to the set 2 step setting. Wouldn't you want it to do so smoothly and effectively?
Remember....RPM has to increase to the set 2 step setting. Wouldn't you want it to do so smoothly and effectively?
Oct 21, 2009, 05:38 AM
#30
Registered User
