Notices
ECU Flash

94170715 V7 Issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2010, 08:25 PM
  #226  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
mfr122887's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
with the addition of BIGMAP the map locaitons have changed somewhat...

it's probably 3 = normal, 4 = altmap now
OK thank. So 8425 is still the correct address?

What MUT addresses are free other than the ones you use: 00 - 04, 40 - 43?
Old Apr 27, 2010, 08:25 PM
  #227  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Evoryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: ☼ Florida ☼
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Let me compare my XML see what's diff
Old Apr 27, 2010, 08:26 PM
  #228  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
most of the MUT4X are free - but look in your logger and if your using it already then dont overwrite it hehehe

8425 should be correct
Old Apr 27, 2010, 08:29 PM
  #229  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
mfr122887's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
most of the MUT4X are free - but look in your logger and if your using it already then dont overwrite it hehehe

8425 should be correct
Thanks.

So the only use for these addresses is for logging? So you can basically use anything you want as long as it isn't currently in use?
Old Apr 27, 2010, 08:43 PM
  #230  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
we think so - although there are some actuator tests and stuff in there as well...

but like I said, MUT4X's are pretty much ok to use...
Old Apr 28, 2010, 07:26 AM
  #231  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
chrisw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks! I wanted to upgrade over the weekend and saw the rom was pulled...

thank you for all your hard work.
Old Apr 28, 2010, 10:56 AM
  #232  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
mfr122887's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
most of the MUT4X are free - but look in your logger and if your using it already then dont overwrite it hehehe

8425 should be correct
Ok, I added 0x8425 to MUT44 and logged it. I was getting a response of 3 on regular maps and on alt maps. I have the ICS set to flash on alt maps, so I know they are activating.

I tried it on a few different MUTs with the same result. Can anyone confirm if 8425 is still correct?
Old May 1, 2010, 06:16 PM
  #233  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
chrisw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So I finally installed V7 today on my Evo..

My initial impressions are pretty good. The light throttle transitions are better, and the car feels smoother when accelerating.

My boost levels are not as consistant as before. I think I need to play around with the temp compensation tables. I am getting a 1-1.5psi fluxuation in boost when I first hit max boost. It's not over boosting, but hitting my max desired boost and then dropping by as much as 1.5 psi.

I have not tried any real tuning of the boost tables yet, other than turning down the boost a little for 1st and 2nd gear to prevent some knock that I was getting. (hitting higher load cells a little too quickly for the tune I have)


All the problems with the gear related boost issues seem to have been resolved, but I am having issues with getting values to log correctly in EvoScan, and also to display properly in Data Lab Log.

The only real issue I have is a persistant P01400 Manifold pressure differential. This happens on vacuum under light throttle, never under boost. It looks like the range values are not correct. This is with a JDM 3bar sensor, a sensor I know works (it was this morning before I loaded V7)

thoughts?
Old May 2, 2010, 05:19 AM
  #234  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
chmodlf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which evoscan values are not logging correctly?
Old May 2, 2010, 05:51 AM
  #235  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
chmodlf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tephra

What load is this rom using for timing and fuel? I have read different opinions. Some say that it is raw and others the compensated-baro-temp for timing and raw for fuel IIRC.
Old May 2, 2010, 05:56 AM
  #236  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
not sure the be honest... can't be bothered looking it up

but yeh there are 4 different loads and all the various subroutines use different ones..

suffice to say - that they are all within 20points of each other, and only really deviate at high load...
Old May 2, 2010, 06:12 AM
  #237  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
chrisw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chmodlf
Which evoscan values are not logging correctly?
It is not a question of the data not getting logged, it is, but EvoScan definitions are incomplete, obsolete, or otherwise missing.

This problem is on my end, nothing to do with the V7 patch I think.
Old May 2, 2010, 08:07 AM
  #238  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
chmodlf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Confirmed that the alt map 8425 address is not working. It always reads 3. ICS display indicates that the map is switching.

???

Last edited by chmodlf; May 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM.
Old May 2, 2010, 11:49 AM
  #239  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
chmodlf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can someone confirm that uses ECU boost that their Boost error and WCDC Correction is working. Mine always registers -3.087 for Boost error and 0 for WGDC Correction.

I was logging today and the WGDC did not correct downward when it should have.

All my settings appear to be correct. Wow another problem...

Last edited by chmodlf; May 2, 2010 at 12:29 PM.
Old May 2, 2010, 04:20 PM
  #240  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
well the boost error has already been covered in this thread... either your not going into open loop or your rpm activation/deactivation is wrong...

sorry about 8425, all the maps are located at 0x3xxxx - so it wont tell you what map your on...

try 0x8426...

does logging gears work? i take it you applied the gear fix?


Quick Reply: 94170715 V7 Issues



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 PM.