Notices
ECU Flash

94170715 V7 Issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 5, 2010, 12:14 PM
  #61  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by chmodlf
What you are logging is the 2 bytes (RPM, Load, Airflow). This is different from what Tephra put in his v7 roms 9653 and 94170715. Remember MUT logs what you the end user wants. There are no "wrong" answers here. MUT is only logging parameters not changing the way the code itself works. 2 byte RPM is unnecessary. 2 byte load can also be replaced by 1 byte which is in some sense a more efficient way of logging load. My only advice is to be careful which MUT addresses you overwrite.

BTW Some of my MUT requests are logging different compensated loads (temp, and baro and temp) which depending on which rom are used rather than the uncompensated or raw load.
Not if you rev higher the 7968rpm.
Old Apr 6, 2010, 05:00 PM
  #62  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
chmodlf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 885
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Boosted Tuning
Not if you rev higher the 7968rpm.
Sounds like you are having some fun
Old Apr 7, 2010, 03:17 AM
  #63  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by Boosted Tuning
Not if you rev higher the 7968rpm.
yeah but you probably wont be reving much higher and you can always manually calculate the rpm since the 1byte will loop over... so just add 7968 to it

logging stuff thats not worthwhile really isn't worth it

Old Apr 7, 2010, 05:59 PM
  #64  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
ok EvoKid told me apparently there is a problem with 94170715 V7...

Can someone give me a run down again? its been a long time
Old Apr 7, 2010, 06:11 PM
  #65  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ace33joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Posts: 394
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
ok EvoKid told me apparently there is a problem with 94170715 V7...

Can someone give me a run down again? its been a long time
First of all, I appreciate your efforts for providing these awesome mods! Regardless of these minor issues, I love the V7 roms!

I am willing to help you resolving the minor problems, if there is something I can do.

So far I noticed gear, RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVG, and boost error (when using psi based boost control) are not logging right, and I think related functions are not working fully yet.
Old Apr 7, 2010, 06:44 PM
  #66  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
ok one at a time then

can you :

1) post a picture (readable) of your MUT_TABLE
2) post up the xml that you are using for gear and RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVG

Did you use the V7 download or a pre-configured rom by phenem/applaud/whoever?
Old Apr 7, 2010, 06:48 PM
  #67  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I sent him my XML. I don't know what ROM he is using. I will email it to you.
Old Apr 7, 2010, 06:59 PM
  #68  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ace33joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Posts: 394
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Ok, I am excited that we are now starting to attack these issues.

For the MUT table, I attached the bmp file.

For the XML, if you mean the evoscan, I used the one posted at the main Tephra Mod V7 page.

<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="Gear" LogReference="Gear" RequestID="40" Eval="x" Unit="units" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="300" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="300" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="5" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="Y" Color="" Display="RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVERAGE" LogReference="RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVERAGE" RequestID="42" RequestID2="43" Eval="x/36.37" Unit="rpm/kph" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="300" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="300" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />

And for the XML for rom itself, I used the Appauldd's most updated one. I added a few minor stuffs, but nothing related to gear or boost.

And for the rom, I first downloaded one from the main Tephra MOD V7 page (post #1), and then I found the gear based boost is not working, so I started fresh from downloaded from post #2 of the Tephra MOD V7 page. (Phenem's pre-configured one, Option 2 (V7 + Mods Omni 4bar))

I can also email you my updated XML + rom to you if you let me know your email address. Thanks!!!

EDIT: My original post about this issue is here.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/8139848-post184.html
Attached Thumbnails 94170715 V7 Issues-mut.jpg  

Last edited by ace33joe; Apr 7, 2010 at 07:14 PM.
Old Apr 7, 2010, 07:04 PM
  #69  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Appauldd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern KY near Cincy
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
You have mail. I sent my rom and XML for your viewing pleasure.
Old Apr 7, 2010, 07:19 PM
  #70  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
ok so Gear is using MUT40...

if we look at your MUT_TABLE MUT40 refers to 0x8447 - which hopefully expands to 0xFFFF8447 (you might need to get the other MUT TABLE XML to double check this)

V7 uses 0xFFFF8446 for the gear ratio, so the 0xFFFF8447 is correct.

as long as that subroutine is being run...

RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVG is MUT42 and MUT43.. which in your MUT_TABLE refer to 0x8448 and 0x8449

looking at my code, RPM_SPEED_RATIO_AVG is 0xFFFF8448... so again correct...

i just looked at my blank 94170715 V7 ROM and that code is being called correctly

can you please send me the ROM that you are using?

Cheers
D.
Old Apr 7, 2010, 07:19 PM
  #71  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
sorry Applaud - that last post is for ace33joe
Old Apr 7, 2010, 07:20 PM
  #72  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
CRAPPPP

found the problem...

edit - can you add this to your tephramod_94170715.xml
Code:
<table name="94170715 GEAR Fix1" category="TephraMod-V7" address="3f16e" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>
then change 0x6a2c to 0x8a2c

then flash and report back

Last edited by tephra; Apr 7, 2010 at 07:23 PM.
Old Apr 7, 2010, 07:24 PM
  #73  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ace33joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Posts: 394
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
sorry Applaud - that last post is for ace33joe
Ok, I cannot find your email address. If you can shoot me an email to me, I can reply to it.

ace33joe at gmail dot com

Thanks!

Last edited by ace33joe; Apr 7, 2010 at 10:10 PM.
Old Apr 7, 2010, 07:26 PM
  #74  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ace33joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Posts: 394
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
CRAPPPP

found the problem...

edit - can you add this to your tephramod_94170715.xml
Code:
<table name="94170715 GEAR Fix1" category="TephraMod-V7" address="3f16e" type="1D" scaling="Hex16"/>
then change 0x6a2c to 0x8a2c

then flash and report back
Ohhhhhh! I will test it tonight, and report it back! Only noon here, and I am at work! Thanks, Tephra!
Old Apr 7, 2010, 08:01 PM
  #75  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
ace33joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Used to be in Nor Cal, now working in Seoul
Posts: 394
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by chmodlf
I am pleased that this rom is available so no bad kharma.

I also noticed that the Max WGDC vs coolant temp address is off in appauldd's xml. Anyone know the correct address? It is currently 56D2.
Ok, one more here.

Max WGDC vs. Coolant temp table looks weird as attached.

Thanks!
Attached Images  


Quick Reply: 94170715 V7 Issues



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:59 AM.