Seijuro

This is another classic sign of too rich. I know you've leaned it out and it didn't help. Lean it out more.

xmaciek82x

iTrader: (14)

OK. Thanks guys. I won't be able to try this out until next week. I will report back then.

vmrevo9

iTrader: (33)

Bringing it back from the dead. I have PTE 1000cc and i have the same issue. I have adjusted the cranking enrichment table using the formula mentioned above. I have also adjusted the individual cells. Anyword from the OP? Did You figure it out?

3K

iTrader: (9)

How do you get the IPW cranking table? I have a 03 and it doesn't have that table.

xmaciek82x

iTrader: (14)

Adjusting the cranking enrichment table never helped me. Since I started the thread, I switched over to Speed Density and have not had this issue.

vmrevo9

iTrader: (33)

Im actually looking towards SD myself

xmaciek82x

iTrader: (14)

Stock turbo?

vmrevo9

iTrader: (33)

bbk full

Thoe99

iTrader: (25)

I have a BBK Full on order and have narrowed my injector choice to PTE 1000cc's, after the recommendation by CBRD. So you're saying it won't work as smoothly, if I just use the scaling values here?

Originally Posted by Testudo
PHP Code:
PTE 1000cc

Scaling 725

Latency

3.312
2.186
1.281
0.771
0.458
0.283
0.172

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...upermerge.html

vmrevo9

iTrader: (33)

I cant say it will or wont. Each car is different along with each set of injectors. In my case startup could be improved but its work in progress. The scaling i used with my injectors was 886, 725 wouldnt work at all.

Fuel trims look good according to the formula i have in evoscan usually around +/- 2%

CBRD

iTrader: (60)

For reference I'm usually in high 700s-810 on the pte1000 with .30 or so added to latencies.

Cb