Notices
ECU Flash

Speed Density 2.0 (3D VE Tables, Baro)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2013, 05:53 PM
  #751  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by 90zcrex
You don't really need to use excel. You just log your volumetric efficiency while still on maf Rom. And then filll out the VE table in you SD rom with the values you logged. You can set it up so that you can read kpa vs rpm in evoscan logviewer and then just transfer over to your sd ve table.

This is exactly what I started doing today.

My ve from my already tuned by target afr set up was very close in some areas, transitional pressures, and off by 10 or so at 240 kpa. That's just a reflections of the already tuned sd ve table being based of ideal afrs vs my maf rom having typical 10. Xx to achieve 11.xx.

I'm gonna unhook my wga from the flapper. This method has tremendously leaped and bounded over the log and lookup map adjust ve flash method
Old Jul 24, 2013, 02:20 AM
  #752  
Evolving Member
 
MercenaryX2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 90zcrex
You don't really need to use excel. You just log your volumetric efficiency while still on maf Rom. And then filll out the VE table in you SD rom with the values you logged. You can set it up so that you can read kpa vs rpm in evoscan logviewer and then just transfer over to your sd ve table.
Thanks for that. Reason I ask is cause I just had a headache of a time creating an SD table from scratch for a buddy of mine and he was getting rather impatient with me. Partially his fault cause he installed the SD sensors and deleted the MAF then sold it before we even flashed it to an SD rom... I'll remember this though.
Old Jul 24, 2013, 05:14 AM
  #753  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
I'm comin up with some odd ve calculations . I'm only using wot data, there's a big difference between 220 kpa and 240 kpa


Can anyone share a 3d view done this way?
Old Jul 24, 2013, 07:32 AM
  #754  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
90zcrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What kind of difference are you getting? What rpm? I see around 102-105 VE in that area at around 3700-3900 rpm. I actually didn't even use Evoscan while making my VE map. It's pretty easy to just look at a couple datalogs and get an idea of what it should be in certain areas. Now that I've fixed the 1:1 issue I'm reading almost dead on with my maf tune at WOT. I have a couple small areas to add a little fuel withe VE but overall it was pretty damn easy. Almost too easy lol.
Old Jul 24, 2013, 09:31 AM
  #755  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
220 kpa sees 120% tapering to 114%

240 kpa sees 111 tapering to 103

I took all of my wot logs, combined them in to one log and used map tracer to display that log. Used map as my x axis too

Now that I've worked out the kinks so I can brake load every thing like hell lol

Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Jul 24, 2013 at 09:34 AM.
Old Jul 25, 2013, 10:03 PM
  #756  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Jack_of_Trades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Opelika,AL
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
It's not uncommon to see VE begin to taper down as load increases. This is generally due to the engines actual VE being limited by back pressure in the system. That does seem like a drastic jump from 220 to 240 though.

-Jamie
Old Jul 25, 2013, 11:55 PM
  #757  
Evolving Member
 
el.guerrero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is properly to adjust VE to get afr map closer to afr you log? or is really wrong?
Old Jul 26, 2013, 04:20 AM
  #758  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by Jack_of_Trades
It's not uncommon to see VE begin to taper down as load increases. This is generally due to the engines actual VE being limited by back pressure in the system. That does seem like a drastic jump from 220 to 240 though.

-Jamie
Thx, I'm workin in my logging technique still maybe ill get that one sorted over a few more. 240 kpa is wastegate pressure so I mainly have increasing tps logs across those 220 cells. Segway to..


Is it important to use increasing tps only or ca. Steady state tps data be used aswell?
Old Jul 29, 2013, 02:51 PM
  #759  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
I unhooked my waste gate actuator and got my ve for 100-110 kpa, I don't believe that would effect ve. Does anyone have any thoughts there?
Old Jul 29, 2013, 04:58 PM
  #760  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
domyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 878
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 211ratsbud
I unhooked my waste gate actuator and got my ve for 100-110 kpa, I don't believe that would effect ve. Does anyone have any thoughts there?
No effect to VE (in my thinking)....

what I can say is that I found something that messes the VE calcs logging:

A synapse BOV can be either open or shut at the same load and rpm (i.e 80 load/3000RPM) depending on TPS behavior (movement/speed/up or down).

Like you said, it's important to log only stable/raising tps and no decel at all while doing this method.
Old Jul 30, 2013, 08:44 AM
  #761  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Big Bald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hamden, Connecticut 06514
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a stupid question. Speed Density uses the 3D VE table exclusively even if running open loop full time? I thought i read somewhere that above 90% throttle is switches to the fuel map. I searched for the answer on here but did not find anything to confirm that.
Old Jul 30, 2013, 09:32 AM
  #762  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
evo8426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 4,248
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Bald
I have a stupid question. Speed Density uses the 3D VE table exclusively even if running open loop full time? I thought i read somewhere that above 90% throttle is switches to the fuel map. I searched for the answer on here but did not find anything to confirm that.
It uses the VE map 100% of the time.
Old Jul 30, 2013, 06:01 PM
  #763  
Evolved Member
 
EvocentriK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 500
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
OK couple of mega noob questions.

I have a JDM 8 and I'm running 96534706 (3d). I read the 9653 MAF rom being based on EDM was never designed for use with a MAP sensor. Now I'm obviously running one (GM3bar) and I have it connected to pin 92 of my 3 plug ECU. I log this input from MUT38. However for SD rom the rom needs to know what boost is, but I have no code to set to 1. scale the GM3bar and 2. tell the rom what address to look at for the MAP sensor input. I'm assuming this rom was written for USDM cars with a MAP sensor and the address for this input coded in accordingly. What do I need to do since I run this rom on a JDM 3 plug?

All I have are these settings for Max VE etc.

Name:  mapsensorSD.png
Views: 0
Size:  34.3 KB

What do I set them to and do I need additional code to set GM3bar scaling/address so the rom can use it. Mrfreds thread has all but 9653 code.
Old Jul 30, 2013, 10:46 PM
  #764  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Right click on the map kpa table and be sure that bathe scaling for map sensor is set to your 3 bar.


8858 that I use also did not come with a map sensor.! Map:kpa table is the one you're concerned with though.
Old Jul 31, 2013, 12:58 AM
  #765  
Evolved Member
 
EvocentriK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 500
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yep I have scaled both to GM3bar. But how does it know what the output of the MAP sensor is if you never tell it what address to read it from?

When changing from stock to JDM MAP sensor the Mid VE Max voltage/min voltage etc need to be changed. I'd like to know what to do with them for a GM 3 bar too.


Quick Reply: Speed Density 2.0 (3D VE Tables, Baro)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:17 AM.