Notices
ECU Flash

Speed Density 2.0 (3D VE Tables, Baro)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2013, 12:53 AM
  #541  
Evolving Member
 
Biggy VIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Russia, Moscow
Posts: 424
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by cdrinkh2o
Hey BIGGY your scaling is correct for the JDM MAP sensor, but in your Map Sensor kPa table, the Map Volts (kPa) values are wrong.

They should look like this:

I made the same mistake. The values change in the left hand column of this table when you first change the scaling. You have to make a copy of the values , then change the scaling, before finally pasting the original values back in.

This should increase the kPa values read by the ECU and therefore calculated as Load during transition from idle to boost. Let us know how you go.
I believe you are wrong, as your statement contradicts the instruction of the mod developer.

Originally Posted by RoadSpike
Clearly some people are having trouble grasping this relatively simple patch so i'll just draw it out for them picture are worth a thousand words right?

As you should be able to tell the Map volts vs kpa should always be 1:1 so you don't screw up the other table axis. What will happen is you'll measure 40kpa or something and it wont match to the point on the table because its not aligned.

If you want to effect load you do that with the kPA vs Load table while this should have been obvious I guess its not.

Old Feb 9, 2013, 07:38 PM
  #542  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ReaperX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Anyone have the xml for 9417 3d? it seems to be missing from the xml in the op.
Old Feb 9, 2013, 08:16 PM
  #543  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
10isace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: East of the Rockies
Posts: 1,048
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by ReaperX
Anyone have the xml for 9417 3d? it seems to be missing from the xml in the op.
I just set mine up about an hour ago. Mine wouldn't come up until I closed Ecu Flash and reopened it.
Old Feb 9, 2013, 09:11 PM
  #544  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by cdrinkh2o


Guys - Here's the 3DVE table I created as a starting point for 96534706 by mapping Load1B, kPa and RPM then calculating VE (Jamie's method), using my MAF tune on 96530706. (Mods in sig below).

My question is do the VE values look OK as a starting point for SD 2.0?
looks good to me, jamie's method is becoming very appealing to me as I go on and on and on..
Old Feb 11, 2013, 08:44 PM
  #545  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by cdrinkh2o


Guys - Here's the 3DVE table I created as a starting point for 96534706 by mapping Load1B, kPa and RPM then calculating VE (Jamie's method), using my MAF tune on 96530706. (Mods in sig below).

My question is do the VE values look OK as a starting point for SD 2.0?
Why wouldn't you just run that in a 3D SD rom instead of of bothering with 2D after all that work? It looks to be worth trying in 3D first.

-Jamie
Old Feb 11, 2013, 09:06 PM
  #546  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
I didn't see anything of 2d?



Unless of course I totally missed that too..

Last edited by 211Ratsbud; Feb 11, 2013 at 09:10 PM.
Old Feb 12, 2013, 01:25 AM
  #547  
Newbie
 
Mr.Nik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Russia
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Give the initial settings for the GM IAT, Omni 4 bar. 9563 Variant.
Old Feb 12, 2013, 04:42 AM
  #548  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by 211ratsbud
I didn't see anything of 2d?



Unless of course I totally missed that too..
My bad, I misread 2.0 as 2D since I always call it 3D, not version 2.0.

-Jamie
Old Feb 12, 2013, 11:39 AM
  #549  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (7)
 
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,142
Received 152 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
Why wouldn't you just run that in a 3D SD rom instead of of bothering with 2D after all that work? It looks to be worth trying in 3D first.

-Jamie
Hey Jamie,

It's not much work, I just drive around for a few days running my tuned MAF map (96530706) and log Load1B, VE, and JDMMAPkPa. Excel does the rest.

I thought 96534706 is a 3D ROM

I have tried to run this in a 3D ROM (96534706). So far, with kPaJDMMAP scaling selected and set up 1:1, and kPa to Load set 1:1, it is still way too lean on tip in and in transition to boost. I've yet to find time to troubleshoot why. I've tried increasing the logged 3D VE values in the 1500-2500 RPM and 70-100 kPa range with no success. My STFT's are still maxed at +12.5% in this zone. My fuel map, injector sizing, latencies, and MAF tables are all copied from my MAF tune. Asynch vs TPS is fattened up 10 units across the board.

Either I have screwed up logging kPa (the Evoscan conversion I'm using is x/3 for my JDMMAP sensor ), or miscalculated VE (=Load1B*100/kPaJDMMAP), when logging with MAF. When I double check kPa logged against a calibrated boost guage the calculation looks good.

Do you have any other suggestions for troubleshooting why this ROM doesn't seem to respond to increasing VE?

Last edited by CDrinkH2O; Feb 12, 2013 at 11:49 AM. Reason: typo
Old Feb 12, 2013, 12:25 PM
  #550  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
211Ratsbud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Watertown, NY
Posts: 4,279
Received 41 Likes on 40 Posts
I *think* 9417 is the way to go by the sounds of others conversations ive read.
Old Feb 12, 2013, 12:29 PM
  #551  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Just for fun, try it on the 9417 version. Your logged VE map from your MAF tune came out really well though, good job.

-Jamie
Old Feb 12, 2013, 12:50 PM
  #552  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
I recommend logging ONLY RPM, KPA, LOAD,VE. I usually uncheck the 'LOG DATA TO SCREEN' option to get more data as well. You want as MANY logged items per cell as possible to get a solid average. 3-4 items per cell isn't really enough.

-Jamie
Old Feb 12, 2013, 08:13 PM
  #553  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (7)
 
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,142
Received 152 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
Just for fun, try it on the 9417 version. Your logged VE map from your MAF tune came out really well though, good job.

-Jamie
Jamie,
I'm copying the tables over now to 94172715 and will try that one for giggles. Will report back.

Is 96534706 known to be a "bad" 3D ROM for the 2005 Evo8? I've not seen these "conversations" that 211ratsbud alluded to above. It would be useful to know if that is really the case as it would save people a bunch of time and frustration.
Old Feb 12, 2013, 08:15 PM
  #554  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (7)
 
CDrinkH2O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,142
Received 152 Likes on 116 Posts
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
I recommend logging ONLY RPM, KPA, LOAD,VE. I usually uncheck the 'LOG DATA TO SCREEN' option to get more data as well. You want as MANY logged items per cell as possible to get a solid average. 3-4 items per cell isn't really enough.

-Jamie
Yeah good point. I'd also recommend some creative filtering in Excel to remove any entries that are logged during decceleration as this throws the averages out a mile.
Old Feb 12, 2013, 08:57 PM
  #555  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by 99EclipseGSX
The kpa Kavlico 3.5bar MAP scaling is wrong, the load values are too low (car runs lean). I added a 20kpa offset to the right side of the MAP Sensor kPa table and it was dead on at idle, but at higher loads it was off, so it's the scalar and the offset that are both incorrect. I tried to fix it but I'm not versed enough in scalings to do it properly myself. The Kavlico is the same as the SSI and AEM 3.5 bar and is as follows:

0.5v = 0kPa / 0PSIa
4.5v = 344.73kPa / 50PSIa

Old 2D SD scalings (psia) for this sensor are correct.

Beau
Here are the scalings I use for SD roms:

Code:
<scaling name="kPa JDM3barMAP" units="kPa" toexpr="x/3" frexpr="x*3" format="%.1f" min="0" max="350" inc="0.3333" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
	<scaling name="kPa Kavlico3.5barMAP" units="kPa" toexpr="x*0.422245373-43.092233" frexpr="(x+43.092233)/0.422245373" format="%.1f" min="0" max="400" inc="0.422245" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
	<scaling name="kPa Kavlico5barMAP" units="kPa" toexpr="x*0.63370927-64.6383455" frexpr="(x+64.6383455)/0.63370927" format="%.1f" min="0" max="500" inc="0.633709" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
	<scaling name="kPa OMNI3barMAP" units="kPa" toexpr="x*0.30938772" frexpr="x/0.30938772" format="%.1f" min="0" max="300" inc="0.309388" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
	<scaling name="kPa OMNI4barMAP" units="kPa" toexpr="x*0.4083631" frexpr="x/0.4083631" format="%.1f" min="0" max="400" inc="0.408363" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>




And here are the formulas for evoscan:

Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Kavlico 3.5 bar kPa" LogReference="Kavlico35barKPA_load" RequestID="38" Eval="x*1.68989149-43.092233" Unit="kPa" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="350" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="350" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" PriorityOffset="0" LogHide="false" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="Kavlico 5 bar kPa" LogReference="Kavlico5barKPA_load" RequestID="38" Eval="x*2.53483708-64.6383455" Unit="kPa" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="500" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="500" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" PriorityOffset="0" LogHide="false" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="OMNI 3 bar kPA" LogReference="OMNI3barKPA_load" RequestID="38" Eval="x*1.23755087" Unit="kpa" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="300" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="300" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" LogHide="false" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="OMNI 4 bar kPA" LogReference="OMNI4barKPA_load" RequestID="38" Eval="x*1.63345239" Unit="kpa" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="1" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="400" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="400" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" LogHide="false" />
-Jamie

Last edited by Dynotech Tuning; Feb 12, 2013 at 08:59 PM.
The following users liked this post:
mines5 (Oct 18, 2016)


Quick Reply: Speed Density 2.0 (3D VE Tables, Baro)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 AM.