EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices

Requested Torque/Throttle Ramp Rate Tables

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2011, 07:59 PM
  #16  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
I added in a few more defs.

I also renamed them to "Requested Torque Ramp Rate" as that is more accurate and put them into the Torque category.
tephra is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 16, 2011, 07:01 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
itzwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Any love for 2011 USDM? I'm interested in ROM 56890010.
itzwolf is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 07:31 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interesting. I might try this out eventually.
murlo26 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 09:30 AM
  #19  
EvoM Community Team
iTrader: (15)
 
fostytou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 3,143
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Nice work as always!
fostytou is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 10:06 AM
  #20  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
A note:

These have much more impact (side effects) on the SST cars then on the 5MT.

Just know this when messing with them.
RazorLab is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 10:50 AM
  #21  
Evolving Member
 
linkbeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by itzwolf
Any love for 2011 USDM? I'm interested in ROM 56890010.
Ditto that. I had this done on my old STi to help with daily driving through Engine Load Compensation tables IIRC. Would also love to do this on my 2011.
Last edited by linkbeat; Oct 17, 2011 at 11:25 AM.
linkbeat is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 11:41 AM
  #22  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Just in case people didn't know the RPM/MPH breakouts:


Evo X GSR
* 1st gear = 175 rpm/mph
* 2nd gear = 119.3 rpm/mph
* 3rd gear = 88.4 rpm/mph
* 4th gear = 67 rpm/mph
* 5th gear = 46.5 rpm/mph

Evo X MR
* 1st gear = 194.3
* 2nd gear = 125.9
* 3rd gear = 93.2
* 4th gear = 70.3
* 5th gear = 53.6
* 6th gear = 41.2
RazorLab is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 05:43 PM
  #23  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
A note:

These have much more impact (side effects) on the SST cars then on the 5MT.

Just know this when messing with them.
Care to elaborate?
tephra is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 06:36 PM
  #24  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
Care to elaborate?
Changes up/downshift characteristics in Auto, etc.

Same with changing requested torque tables.
RazorLab is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 06:37 PM
  #25  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
tephra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,486
Received 66 Likes on 42 Posts
as in more aggresive shifts (ie clunkier)?
tephra is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 06:44 PM
  #26  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (8)
 
RazorLab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mid-Hudson, NY
Posts: 14,065
Received 1,038 Likes on 760 Posts
Originally Posted by tephra
as in more aggresive shifts (ie clunkier)?
More aggressive (or less) up/downshifts. Will "kick-down" much faster (or slower) and at different RPM in Auto. Engine braking changes (clutches take longer or slower to release), etc etc

I've told you a lot of this already David.

Seems like almost all of the torque related tables tweak these things in some way. Probably indirectly.

That 1D table we last talked about in Email (Adjust Offset 2D) for sure changes it. Really bad downshifts (bad rev matching/gearbox meshing) into lower gears with it maxed out.
Last edited by razorlab; Oct 17, 2011 at 06:48 PM.
RazorLab is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 17, 2011, 09:59 PM
  #27  
Newbie
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I drive with changed ramp rate maps since about 2 months now and I am quite sure that the cruise control behaves different than before.
Can anyone confirm this?
Bernhard is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 18, 2011, 12:52 AM
  #28  
Evolving Member
 
RS200Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 150
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the VehicleSpeed address for 2011 EDM should be 62cea instead of 62ce8.
RS200Z is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 18, 2011, 01:23 AM
  #29  
Evolving Member
 
RS200Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 150
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by itzwolf
Any love for 2011 USDM? I'm interested in ROM 56890010.
If you are using Golden's definition, you can add the following into 56890009.XML as 56890010 inherit from that. Otherwise replace the scaling="Percent255" with just "Percent" as per Tephra's post #1.


Code:
  <table name="Requested Torque Ramp Rate - SST Normal Mode" category="Torque" address="5f853" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent255">
    <table name="VehicleSpeed" address="62cea" type="X Axis" elements="6" scaling="VehicleSpeed"/>
  <table name="RevPerMPH" address="63088" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="RPMPerMPH"/>
  </table>

  <table name="Requested Torque Ramp Rate - SST SPORT Mode" category="Torque" address="5f81b" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent255">
    <table name="VehicleSpeed" address="62cea" type="X Axis" elements="6" scaling="VehicleSpeed"/>
    <table name="RevPerMPH" address="63088" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="RPMPerMPH"/>
  </table>

  <table name="Requested Torque Ramp Rate - SST S-SPORT Mode" category="Torque" address="5f7e3" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent255">
    <table name="VehicleSpeed" address="62cea" type="X Axis" elements="6" scaling="VehicleSpeed"/>
    <table name="RevPerMPH" address="63088" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="RPMPerMPH"/>
  </table>

  <table name="Requested Torque Ramp Rate - 5MT" category="Torque" address="5f7ab" type="3D" swapxy="true" scaling="Percent255">
    <table name="VehicleSpeed" address="62cea" type="X Axis" elements="6" scaling="VehicleSpeed"/>
    <table name="RevPerMPH" address="63088" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="RPMPerMPH"/>
  </table>
Last edited by RS200Z; Oct 18, 2011 at 01:32 AM.
RS200Z is offline  
Reply Like
Old Oct 18, 2011, 06:59 AM
  #30  
Evolving Member
 
Jumperalex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Alexandria VA
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by razorlab
More aggressive (or less) up/downshifts. Will "kick-down" much faster (or slower) and at different RPM in Auto. Engine braking changes (clutches take longer or slower to release), etc etc

I've told you a lot of this already David.

Seems like almost all of the torque related tables tweak these things in some way. Probably indirectly.

That 1D table we last talked about in Email (Adjust Offset 2D) for sure changes it. Really bad downshifts (bad rev matching/gearbox meshing) into lower gears with it maxed out.
So are you saying somewhere there is a way to change the behavior, predictably, of Auto-Normal? Because OMG I could love to tweak that to be a bit more agressive. I'd also like to tweak Auto-Sport to be a tad less agressive. They are just to ofar apart to be useful.

Of course I just default to manual-Sport as a result which is what I should be doing anyway
Jumperalex is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Requested Torque/Throttle Ramp Rate Tables


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 AM.