Notices
ECU Flash

Injector flow rate linearization table

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2015, 08:56 PM
  #46  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ixbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: so cal
Posts: 146
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is all I see when I quote text for the table definition....

"The table definition is listed below for the USDM Evo 9 88590015 ROM. <strong>For the 94170015 ROM, change &quot;31db&quot; to &quot;37c7&quot;.</strong> <strong>For the 96530006 ROM, change &quot;31db&quot; to &quot;37c7&quot;.</strong> <strong>For the 90550001 ROM, change &quot;31db&quot; to &quot;3977&quot;.</strong> <strong>USDM Evo 9 88590015 ROM</strong>&nbsp;</p><table></table><p>&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.016 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.048 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.080 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.112 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.144 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.176 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.208 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.240 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.272 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.304 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.336 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.368 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.400 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.432 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.464 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.496 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.528 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.560 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.592 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.624 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.656 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.688 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.720 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.752 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.784 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.816 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.848 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.880 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.912 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.944 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;0.976 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.008 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.040 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.072 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.104 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.136 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.168 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.200 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.232 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.264 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.296 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.328 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.360 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.392 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.424 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.456 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.488 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.520 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.552 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.584 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.616 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.648 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.680 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.712 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.744 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.776 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.808 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.840 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.872 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.904 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.936 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;1.968 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;2.000 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;2.032 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;2.064 &nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;2.096"

there's no definition/address or scaling...just numbers.
Am I missing something???
Old Sep 7, 2015, 07:36 AM
  #47  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Quoting the post worked when I first tried it. Its not now though. It appears that the admins are trying to fix all these definitions but not doing it in a way that preserves the original information. I'll check to see what they are doing because I really don't want to have to redo all my posts with this kind of information.
Old Sep 7, 2015, 09:23 AM
  #48  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ixbreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: so cal
Posts: 146
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the help mrfred! Would certainly be painful to redo all that work.
Old Sep 7, 2015, 09:50 AM
  #49  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by ixbreaker
thanks for the help mrfred! Would certainly be painful to redo all that work.
Looks like its only this thread so far. Others have not yet been altered, so they should look ok once the bug is fixed.
Old Sep 8, 2015, 01:32 PM
  #50  
Admin Emeritus
 
Speedlimit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NR Reading PA
Posts: 2,239
Received 100 Likes on 69 Posts
<p>Hey I apologize, but is a bug that should be fixed this week, I hope.&nbsp;</p><p>Bob</p><p>https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/si...l#post11496812</p>
Old Sep 26, 2015, 06:26 AM
  #51  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
wreckleford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 1,171
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Can Mr. Fred or someone else please repost the table definition as the bug fix doesn't seem to be happening? Thanks a lot.
Old Sep 26, 2015, 09:14 AM
  #52  
Admin Emeritus
 
Speedlimit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NR Reading PA
Posts: 2,239
Received 100 Likes on 69 Posts
Hi,

I'm trying to figure out a work around for now as the text is still intact in the post but not visible.

Bob
Old Sep 26, 2015, 11:25 PM
  #53  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
jedibow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 190
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by wreckleford
Can Mr. Fred or someone else please repost the table definition as the bug fix doesn't seem to be happening? Thanks a lot.
I will see what I can do with 9563 right now...

We have the table address, but need the scalings which I would assume would be hex16? but need the x axis address?

Last edited by jedibow; Sep 26, 2015 at 11:38 PM.
Old Sep 27, 2015, 09:17 AM
  #54  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
ok folks, its fixed. The problem is that the new EvoM text parser is interpreting anything with a &lt; or &gt; as being a parser command. When it encounters the ECUFlash definitions, rather than ignorning the incomprehensible command, it decides to delete it. Yay.
Old Sep 27, 2015, 10:48 PM
  #55  
Evolved Member
 
mines5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Streets of willow
Posts: 863
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
The LINEARIZATION TABLE AND CLOSED LOOP INTEGRAL GAIN addresses are the same for 9417 and 9653 ???? ill be using FIC 1450s for 9653.
Old Sep 28, 2015, 06:37 AM
  #56  
EvoM Guru
Thread Starter
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by mines5
The LINEARIZATION TABLE AND CLOSED LOOP INTEGRAL GAIN addresses are the same for 9417 and 9653 ???? ill be using FIC 1450s for 9653.
I fixed my first post yesterday. It's had the pulsewidth linearization table information on 9417 and 9653 for a while. I don't have the closed loop integral gain table.
Old Sep 28, 2015, 06:56 AM
  #57  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
wreckleford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 1,171
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Thank you!
Old Sep 28, 2015, 09:05 AM
  #58  
Evolved Member
 
mines5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Streets of willow
Posts: 863
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Thanks alot mfred, yours and all the disassemblers contribution for stock ecu is amazing.. added the table..

also added integral gain table. waiting for injectors to arrive .
Old Sep 28, 2015, 09:45 AM
  #59  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
wreckleford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 1,171
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by mines5
Thanks alot mfred, yours and all the disassemblers contribution for stock ecu is amazing.. added the table..

also added integral gain table. waiting for injectors to arrive .
Maybe I am going off topic, but where did you get the integral gain table from? I ma using mrfred's wideband closed loop patch. It works fairly well but it doesn't keep the AFRs as tight as the factory narrow band closed loop. Likely due to the fact that my wideband sensor is further down the exhaust. Tweaking the gain may improve the response.
Old Sep 28, 2015, 11:21 AM
  #60  
Evolved Member
 
mines5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Streets of willow
Posts: 863
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by wreckleford
Maybe I am going off topic, but where did you get the integral gain table from? I ma using mrfred's wideband closed loop patch. It works fairly well but it doesn't keep the AFRs as tight as the factory narrow band closed loop. Likely due to the fact that my wideband sensor is further down the exhaust. Tweaking the gain may improve the response.
it was in this thread or some other thread which i was searching from. Some one posted it the code wasnt showing, i replied with a quote and got the code. Still havnt tested it yet, however ill post it here once i get back home.


Quick Reply: Injector flow rate linearization table



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:37 AM.