Injector flow rate linearization table
#46
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
This is all I see when I quote text for the table definition....
"The table definition is listed below for the USDM Evo 9 88590015 ROM. <strong>For the 94170015 ROM, change "31db" to "37c7".</strong> <strong>For the 96530006 ROM, change "31db" to "37c7".</strong> <strong>For the 90550001 ROM, change "31db" to "3977".</strong> <strong>USDM Evo 9 88590015 ROM</strong> </p><table></table><p> 0.016 0.048 0.080 0.112 0.144 0.176 0.208 0.240 0.272 0.304 0.336 0.368 0.400 0.432 0.464 0.496 0.528 0.560 0.592 0.624 0.656 0.688 0.720 0.752 0.784 0.816 0.848 0.880 0.912 0.944 0.976 1.008 1.040 1.072 1.104 1.136 1.168 1.200 1.232 1.264 1.296 1.328 1.360 1.392 1.424 1.456 1.488 1.520 1.552 1.584 1.616 1.648 1.680 1.712 1.744 1.776 1.808 1.840 1.872 1.904 1.936 1.968 2.000 2.032 2.064 2.096"
there's no definition/address or scaling...just numbers.
Am I missing something???
"The table definition is listed below for the USDM Evo 9 88590015 ROM. <strong>For the 94170015 ROM, change "31db" to "37c7".</strong> <strong>For the 96530006 ROM, change "31db" to "37c7".</strong> <strong>For the 90550001 ROM, change "31db" to "3977".</strong> <strong>USDM Evo 9 88590015 ROM</strong> </p><table></table><p> 0.016 0.048 0.080 0.112 0.144 0.176 0.208 0.240 0.272 0.304 0.336 0.368 0.400 0.432 0.464 0.496 0.528 0.560 0.592 0.624 0.656 0.688 0.720 0.752 0.784 0.816 0.848 0.880 0.912 0.944 0.976 1.008 1.040 1.072 1.104 1.136 1.168 1.200 1.232 1.264 1.296 1.328 1.360 1.392 1.424 1.456 1.488 1.520 1.552 1.584 1.616 1.648 1.680 1.712 1.744 1.776 1.808 1.840 1.872 1.904 1.936 1.968 2.000 2.032 2.064 2.096"
there's no definition/address or scaling...just numbers.
Am I missing something???
#47
Quoting the post worked when I first tried it. Its not now though. It appears that the admins are trying to fix all these definitions but not doing it in a way that preserves the original information. I'll check to see what they are doing because I really don't want to have to redo all my posts with this kind of information.
#50
Admin Emeritus
<p>Hey I apologize, but is a bug that should be fixed this week, I hope. </p><p>Bob</p><p>https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/si...l#post11496812</p>
#54
ok folks, its fixed. The problem is that the new EvoM text parser is interpreting anything with a < or > as being a parser command. When it encounters the ECUFlash definitions, rather than ignorning the incomprehensible command, it decides to delete it. Yay.
#58
Evolved Member
Thanks alot mfred, yours and all the disassemblers contribution for stock ecu is amazing.. added the table..
also added integral gain table. waiting for injectors to arrive .
also added integral gain table. waiting for injectors to arrive .
#59
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Maybe I am going off topic, but where did you get the integral gain table from? I ma using mrfred's wideband closed loop patch. It works fairly well but it doesn't keep the AFRs as tight as the factory narrow band closed loop. Likely due to the fact that my wideband sensor is further down the exhaust. Tweaking the gain may improve the response.
#60
Evolved Member
Maybe I am going off topic, but where did you get the integral gain table from? I ma using mrfred's wideband closed loop patch. It works fairly well but it doesn't keep the AFRs as tight as the factory narrow band closed loop. Likely due to the fact that my wideband sensor is further down the exhaust. Tweaking the gain may improve the response.