WGDC mismatch on Evo 7 w/ Tephra ROM
#1
WGDC mismatch on Evo 7 w/ Tephra ROM
I've been trying to troubleshoot an issue with a friend's car. It's an imported Evo 7 with OEM ECU and the Tephra 90550701 ROM.
The issue I'm running in to is that the ECU isn't following the defined WGDC tables, and possible reading an incorrect BDEL table as well.
These are the tables for boost control. I've verified that we are on the main map, map switching is currently off and I've even copied these to the alternate tables as well.
In the logs, and in the seat of the pants, it's obvious that the boost control is not responding appropriately. The logged WGDC is much lower than it should be. Power is low, then ramps up as expected with the rising WGDC.
Also, I'm seeing the boost error in the positive when the load is below target. I don't think this is the issue and am assuming that the Evo 7 might have a different location for load error and the logged data is inaccurate. Target load should be 255-ish in the midrange and error logs show +18 even with logged load much lower.
Anyone have any ideas on this, aside from just swapping to a MBC? Thanks!
Attached: .bin and recent log file
The issue I'm running in to is that the ECU isn't following the defined WGDC tables, and possible reading an incorrect BDEL table as well.
These are the tables for boost control. I've verified that we are on the main map, map switching is currently off and I've even copied these to the alternate tables as well.
In the logs, and in the seat of the pants, it's obvious that the boost control is not responding appropriately. The logged WGDC is much lower than it should be. Power is low, then ramps up as expected with the rising WGDC.
Also, I'm seeing the boost error in the positive when the load is below target. I don't think this is the issue and am assuming that the Evo 7 might have a different location for load error and the logged data is inaccurate. Target load should be 255-ish in the midrange and error logs show +18 even with logged load much lower.
Anyone have any ideas on this, aside from just swapping to a MBC? Thanks!
Attached: .bin and recent log file
#4
We tested with boost error correction off and boost reacted as normal.
Based on what I can see, either the boost error RAM addresses are incorrect or the BDEL or BCLO RAM addresses are incorrect. Can anyone dig in to see which is the case? I just have no idea where to start looking for that.
Based on what I can see, either the boost error RAM addresses are incorrect or the BDEL or BCLO RAM addresses are incorrect. Can anyone dig in to see which is the case? I just have no idea where to start looking for that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PIE-R
ECU Flash
2
Aug 25, 2020 07:33 PM
CT9A PR
ECU Flash
4
Apr 27, 2020 11:53 PM
barevolved
ECU Flash
10
Oct 12, 2012 09:19 PM
turboracer
ECU Flash
3
May 18, 2008 07:15 PM