Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo IX STOCK TURBO E85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 06:17 AM
  #16  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Originally Posted by Lucas English
[IMG]The easiest way to explain it is why does a 35R at 23psi make more power than a stock turbo at 23psi? Airflow in cfm is significantly greater.
Because you have a greater VE and better efficiency with the bigger turbo. It's not the CFM rating of the turbo, as the engine and VE dictates the CFM, not the turbo.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #17  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
Originally Posted by BLKCarbonEVO
I would go, in this order: BBK-XL or SST (just because I want to see what these new turbos can do) Red, or HTA Green!

OP what did you plan to do next? Stock frame? I really like the HTA3586/88! Sick little turbos

Edit: What was the air temp when you dynoed?
HTA3586! - This is my fav. turbo right now.

Michael
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 09:24 AM
  #18  
BLKCarbonEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,463
Likes: 4
From: VaBeach, VA
Originally Posted by ETS Michael
HTA3586! - This is my fav. turbo right now.

Michael
+1 for 600HP pump gas turbo
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 02:58 PM
  #19  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
Because you have a greater VE and better efficiency with the bigger turbo. It's not the CFM rating of the turbo, as the engine and VE dictates the CFM, not the turbo.
Might be agreeing in radically different ways, but the difference is Airflow independent of what you want to name it.

Air compressors are the same whether its the 30hp craftsman that runs the shop or the 2.5hp that you use on small stuff. Lbs/min is a measurement of air mass which can be converted to CFM and vice versa. It might be more accurate to say a 35R moves more lbs per min than a stocker, but it becomes semantics when in reality its still just air volume.

Engine VE is the amount of the total airflow that can be used by the motor, boost being what stacks up and cant be ingested. This can be because of turbine backpressure, pressure drop in the intercooler or before the turbo. Anything that allows the engine to breathe better will lower boost since VE has gone up.

Some manufacturers, BW being one, do rate their turbos in M^3/CFM.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2009 | 04:29 PM
  #20  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
What I am saying is that it doesn't matter how much a turbo can potentially flow at a certain psi. That doesn't matter. It matters what it's connected to, which is our engine. The engine is what dictates the maximum airflow.

The only reason a bigger turbo can sometimes (not always) produce higher horsepower numbers at the same psi as a smaller turbo is because of two things only...VE and efficiency (temp).

Volumetric airflow through an engine is:

A(cfm)=(Cid*VE*RPM/3456)PR

To convert to a mass airflow:

n (lbs/min) = P (psia) x V (CFM) x 29 / (10.73[ft3·psi· °R-1·lb-mol-1] x T)


You can see the only two variables when going to different turbos is the VE and the T. The T is reduced because of the bigger turbo being run in a higher efficiency island (usually the smaller turbo is being compared at a psi where it is maxing out or close to it, blowing hot air) and the the VE is increased because of the larger hotside and turbine wheel.

Just because a 35R can flow way more than a 16 at 23 psi, doesn't mean it will on our engine. Actually, when smaller turbos are run in their efficiency range, like a 50 trim at 15 psi or so...they can actually achieve more HP than a bigger turbo that is running in a lower efficiency range at that same boost. It's very uncommon to see this, but if the boost gets low enough and the difference in VE isn't too much, you can see it.

I really didn't mean to get into this discussion, but it's sort of a pet peeve of mine when someone says a bigger turbo can flow more air at the same psi as a smaller turbo, so that's why you get more HP. That just isn't true...it's the greater VE and reduced temps (higher efficiency) that achieve the higher HP. The comarison is just usually so skewed because we are usually comparing a completely maxed out small turbo and a big turbo that is right in the sweet spot.


Eric

Last edited by l2r99gst; Sep 11, 2009 at 04:32 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 01:10 PM
  #21  
FTS EVO's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: T-Roy
Good numbers, E85 looks like a winner cant wait to convert.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2009 | 08:38 PM
  #22  
4DR's Avatar
4DR
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: New York
nice #s
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
doom26464
Evo X Dyno Results
10
Jan 14, 2016 06:19 AM
evoscott
Evo General
54
Apr 2, 2012 06:04 AM
gone2pimp
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
28
Dec 13, 2011 10:45 AM
Evo_TK
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
49
Sep 10, 2010 06:53 AM
ant_evoww
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
13
Jul 19, 2010 05:41 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:08 PM.