Ted B. Tuned - 2.0L Twinscroll HTA3582R 93oct
Mar 21, 2010, 08:05 AM
#18
That seems about right for what you have. I would expect mid to high 600s on e85, unless you wanted to stay a bit conservative, then it would be low to mid 600s.
The spool looks similar to most GT35R setups, including my own. It may be slightly better, but you are still not hitting peak torque until around 5500 which is typical for a 35r. Still impressive for having such a large A/R turbine.
You might as well not run it at a drag strip unless you install a roll bar, 5 point harness and scatter shield, because you will just get booted. Nothing wrong with launching the car a few times though, especially if you built up your driveline to handle it.
The spool looks similar to most GT35R setups, including my own. It may be slightly better, but you are still not hitting peak torque until around 5500 which is typical for a 35r. Still impressive for having such a large A/R turbine.
You might as well not run it at a drag strip unless you install a roll bar, 5 point harness and scatter shield, because you will just get booted. Nothing wrong with launching the car a few times though, especially if you built up your driveline to handle it.
Mar 21, 2010, 08:34 AM
#19
Trust me when I say that the difference between this setup and a conventional 35R with open T3 is so vivid, that it's readily apparent from the driver's seat well before the turbo even gets into boost. There are some things a static dyno sheet just cannot reveal. I allowed the driver of a local 35R EVO (which I tuned) take a turn at the wheel of my car to witness the difference for himself. He came away from that experience somewhat dumbfounded. The dyno sheets don't look much different, but the difference in transient response is alarming.
Mar 21, 2010, 08:21 PM
#24
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ct
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...big-power.html
Ted I dont see your twin scroll setup making power sooner.
Ted I dont see your twin scroll setup making power sooner.
Mar 22, 2010, 12:14 AM
#26
If I remake the run at 25 degrees F and the bump in timing that allows, with another 175 lb worth of load as in Freddy's case, you'd see the difference.
But again, as I've said many times before ... it wouldn't matter if the WOT graphs looked identical. Get in the car and drive it, and you'll know the difference in response TS makes immediately. No more dead spots.
But again, as I've said many times before ... it wouldn't matter if the WOT graphs looked identical. Get in the car and drive it, and you'll know the difference in response TS makes immediately. No more dead spots.
Mar 22, 2010, 12:32 AM
#27
If I remake the run at 25 degrees F and the bump in timing that allows, with another 175 lb worth of load as in Freddy's case, you'd see the difference.
But again, as I've said many times before ... it wouldn't matter if the WOT graphs looked identical. Get in the car and drive it, and you'll know the difference in response TS makes immediately. No more dead spots.
But again, as I've said many times before ... it wouldn't matter if the WOT graphs looked identical. Get in the car and drive it, and you'll know the difference in response TS makes immediately. No more dead spots.
Mar 22, 2010, 01:24 AM
#28
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: ct
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I remake the run at 25 degrees F and the bump in timing that allows, with another 175 lb worth of load as in Freddy's case, you'd see the difference.
But again, as I've said many times before ... it wouldn't matter if the WOT graphs looked identical. Get in the car and drive it, and you'll know the difference in response TS makes immediately. No more dead spots.
But again, as I've said many times before ... it wouldn't matter if the WOT graphs looked identical. Get in the car and drive it, and you'll know the difference in response TS makes immediately. No more dead spots.
How much sooner do you think your setup would spool up under the the conditions you stated above?
Mar 22, 2010, 06:40 AM
#30
~250-300 rpm, closer to what you'd expect to see with an FP Black, and peak power recorded that way goes to ~590whp. But again, what you cannot see is how quickly things react each time you hit the pedal. That is where TS makes the biggest impact, and a static dyno run cannot tell you anything about it.