Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

'05 Evo8, GSC S2 cams (317whp/322wtq)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 11, 2013, 04:45 PM
  #31  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
DomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: North nj
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How is that even possible? Im running 301 whp/wtq with only a
Ets licp
Br tbe
Br intake
Evo 9 mr bov
Ivey tune
Old Jan 11, 2013, 05:09 PM
  #32  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by DomP
How is that even possible? Im running 301 whp/wtq with only a
Ets licp
Br tbe
Br intake
Evo 9 mr bov
Ivey tune
You have an '03 evo 8 turbo with a 9.8cm^2 hotside. The '05's use a 10.5cm^2 hotside which is a lot less restrictive. The more restrictive the hotside, the more back pressure between the turbo and the engine. More back pressure=less volumetric efficiency of the engine. If that's 301whp on a dynojet, that's a drastically under-performing setup you have. I would look further into it if that's the case.

-Jamie

Last edited by Dynotech Tuning; Jan 11, 2013 at 05:23 PM.
Old Jan 11, 2013, 05:27 PM
  #33  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
DomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: North nj
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So your saying 301 whp with stock cams, injectors, intercooler and turbo on an 03' @ 21psi is under performing?
Old Jan 11, 2013, 05:37 PM
  #34  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by DomP
So your saying 301 whp with stock cams, injectors, intercooler and turbo on an 03' @ 21psi is under performing?
Ah, I totally missed the stock cams. Yeah, GSC S2's are a BIG factor there lol. 280-300whp on our mustang dyno with stock evo 8 cams is about the most you generally will ever see.

-Jamie
Old Jan 11, 2013, 05:45 PM
  #35  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
DomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: North nj
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
Ah, I totally missed the stock cams. Yeah, GSC S2's are a BIG factor there lol. 280-300whp on our mustang dyno with stock evo 8 cams is about the most you generally will ever see.

-Jamie
Lol i was about to flip out, i thought i was doing pretty good! Im just confused when i see so many posting dyno numbers only 15-20 hp than me with what i would consider significantly more mods like cams and injectors. My next mod will be an ets 3.5", s2's uicp with tial vto and speed density with a retune. Im hoping for 350 whp. I dont want to run SD per say but i found out after the install the br intake was making me stall occasionally.
Old Jan 12, 2013, 12:34 AM
  #36  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
AreSTG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: PA/NC
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
Ah, I totally missed the stock cams. Yeah, GSC S2's are a BIG factor there lol. 280-300whp on our mustang dyno with stock evo 8 cams is about the most you generally will ever see.

-Jamie
he also doesn't have test pipe in his list. that's a chunk of power
Old Jan 12, 2013, 12:42 PM
  #37  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
mitsubeastlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I made 300whp/298ft lbs on a mustang dyno at FFTEC running 91 oct.

My mods include:

Evo IX turbo
ETS LICP
Evo IX bov
ETS full intake + k&n open filter
Unknown 3' downpipe
Hi flow cat
Buschur 3 inch exhaust
1050 FIC injecotors
Aeromotive 340lph fuel pump
FFTEC boost solonoid


I just purchased the ETS 2.5inch short route UICP, GSC S2 cams, GSC Hi Rev valvetrain, MAP H11 headstuds, Amsoil open Intake filter

how much do you think I will make with a e85 retune? I hear the gsc s2 do very well. **srry to thread jack**
Old Jan 12, 2013, 01:09 PM
  #38  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Probably between 380-400whp on E85 depending on boost levels and such.
Old Jan 12, 2013, 01:28 PM
  #39  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
jeremy52048's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Yuba City, CA-530
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
how many miles are on the car OP, this gave me hope on my 05 evo man.. ive seen some low number so im hoping for around what you got
Old Jan 12, 2013, 05:04 PM
  #40  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
DomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: North nj
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
65k on my 03'

Beastlee i think you would benifit greatly with a new intercooler
Old Jan 13, 2013, 08:08 AM
  #41  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
mitsubeastlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DomP
65k on my 03'

Beastlee i think you would benifit greatly with a new intercooler

oops! I forgot I have an ETS 3.5 core FMIC (had it when I was tuned the first time) Im just wondering because I have a friend that made 365whp on91 and 385whp on the same mustang dyno, only mods that differ from my setup is the MIVEC and QTP cutout ( I have full 3 inch). I will have H11 headstuds so in theory could I boost more than him to compensate for MIVEC? I just really want to hit the big 400whp before going with a larger turbo!
Old Jan 13, 2013, 04:36 PM
  #42  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
DomP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: North nj
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On 91 i dont see you hitting 400 without a turbo. In any case you will need a shep trans. I presonaly would work on braking and suspension before braking 360+
Old Jan 13, 2013, 05:04 PM
  #43  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by mitsubeastlee
oops! I forgot I have an ETS 3.5 core FMIC (had it when I was tuned the first time) Im just wondering because I have a friend that made 365whp on91 and 385whp on the same mustang dyno, only mods that differ from my setup is the MIVEC and QTP cutout ( I have full 3 inch). I will have H11 headstuds so in theory could I boost more than him to compensate for MIVEC? I just really want to hit the big 400whp before going with a larger turbo!
mivec helps mostly for spoolup not peak hp. there is no restriction at higher rpm. also just because you have stronger studs wont change anything. ive tuned stock blocks with stock bolts to 550WHP~ (130 traps 1/4). its all about the tune. if the tune is dead on and there is no signs of abnormally raised cylinder pressure it will not fatigue the stock head bolts. your map studs are good reassurance though, so its not a bad investment on your behalf.

Originally Posted by DomP
On 91 i dont see you hitting 400 without a turbo. In any case you will need a shep trans. I presonaly would work on braking and suspension before braking 360+
you don't need a shep trans with 400whp. hell Steve is using a evo 9 5 spd trapping almost 134 with a fp black.

i had customers go over 130 with mr 6spd's also. 400 is a walk in the park for a healthy stock trans.

suspension and braking is fine for the evo stock unless yours are worn out.
Old Jan 13, 2013, 05:09 PM
  #44  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
 
Dynotech Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Seekonk, MA
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by mitsubeastlee
oops! I forgot I have an ETS 3.5 core FMIC (had it when I was tuned the first time) Im just wondering because I have a friend that made 365whp on91 and 385whp on the same mustang dyno, only mods that differ from my setup is the MIVEC and QTP cutout ( I have full 3 inch). I will have H11 headstuds so in theory could I boost more than him to compensate for MIVEC? I just really want to hit the big 400whp before going with a larger turbo!
There is no way you'd make that power on 91 octane on our mustang dyno. The most you'll see on 93 on a stock 9 turbo, on our mustang dyno, is around 330whp weather corrected. Just so people are clear, you weren't referring to the dyno in our facility.

-Jamie
Old Jan 17, 2013, 03:39 PM
  #45  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
mitsubeastlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dynotech Tuning
There is no way you'd make that power on 91 octane on our mustang dyno. The most you'll see on 93 on a stock 9 turbo, on our mustang dyno, is around 330whp weather corrected. Just so people are clear, you weren't referring to the dyno in our facility.

-Jamie
And i thought all mustang dynos were created equal lol. Yeah he only made like 20whp more on e85 and when he told me I suspected he would have made less on 91 also. But I know forsure fftec uses a mustang. I really could care less about what I make on 91 honestly I would rather have my 91 tune be like a fuel save tune if anything. Make my e85 tune all out power. Idk I just really wanna hit the 400whp mark, but im glad to know mivec doesnt help the top end.


Quick Reply: '05 Evo8, GSC S2 cams (317whp/322wtq)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:30 AM.