Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Mellon Racing – Jon’s EVO 8 * 2.4 Liter Stock Evo 8 Turbo * on E85 @ 30Psi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 25, 2011, 09:44 AM
  #1  
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (74)
 
Gary@MellonRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: miami florida
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Mellon Racing – Jon’s EVO 8 * 2.4 Liter Stock Evo 8 Turbo * on E85 @ 30Psi

Mellon Racing – Jon’s EVO 8 * Stock Turbo * on E85 @ 30Psi

Name: Jon
Forum Name: jrah2987
Location: St. Charles, MO
2003 EVO 8 5-speed USDM
Stock Evo 8 Turbo
Buschur stage III head
Stock Cams
FIC 1250 injectors
AEM Uego Wideband
3” TBE test 02 housing
Cone Stock Filter
Rubber Intake ETS 3.5” with upper and lower pipes
Tial Q VTA BOV
E85 @ 30 PSI
VD 364Hp/364Tq


Jon has a 2.4 liter Build motor on a Build head and using the stock Evo 8 turbo , we got the car filled up on E-85 and started to tune it , BAAMM ! Instant Boost we moved it up in to the 30psi and the car would just boost extremely fast down low, this is one brave little turbo but since eveything in life is not always fair, yes u guessed it it started to die up top in the High Rpm area , so we talked about upgrading to a bigger turbo for the car to have a thicker powerband .




Last edited by Gary@MellonRacing; Sep 25, 2011 at 10:01 AM.
Old Sep 25, 2011, 10:38 AM
  #2  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
longdingydong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: fl
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is one smooth graph.whats car being built for? street, track, ect? would like to see a 6766 on that setup good job and good luck with the next setup
Old Sep 25, 2011, 11:28 AM
  #3  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
PlanoEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: My House
Posts: 706
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Would love to see a graph showing 2500-7500 so we can see the ramp up I bet the line would be near vertical even more so than mine.
Old Sep 25, 2011, 03:16 PM
  #4  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
unfortunately the built motor was making so much noise down low that we had to start the pulls above 3500 rpm. Maybe next time we'll adjust the knock sensor sensitivity down there when he does a bigger turbo.
Old Sep 26, 2011, 05:33 AM
  #5  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
evo8426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Posts: 4,248
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Just wondering, why would you not adjust the knock sensor to allow for the man to drive his car under 4000rpm? Having the car tuned IMO is part of getting the whole car tuned, not just 4000-7500rpm
Old Sep 26, 2011, 06:53 AM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Tuxevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 569
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Mellon Racing
unfortunately the built motor was making so much noise down low that we had to start the pulls above 3500 rpm. Maybe next time we'll adjust the knock sensor sensitivity down there when he does a bigger turbo.
Originally Posted by evo8426
Just wondering, why would you not adjust the knock sensor to allow for the man to drive his car under 4000rpm? Having the car tuned IMO is part of getting the whole car tuned, not just 4000-7500rpm
I agree with this entirely. A customer came to you to do a job and you failed to finish. He didn't ask for a partial tune and a turbo recommendation, did he? Perhaps he enjoys having a very usable power band and not needing to rev to the moon.

To the owner of the car, if you're reading this and would like some recomendations on tuners who can do the job without needing to sell you new parts, feel free to pm me.

You used to do good things Mellon. I hope this makes you want to get back to those old habits.
Old Sep 26, 2011, 09:25 AM
  #7  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by evo8426
Just wondering, why would you not adjust the knock sensor to allow for the man to drive his car under 4000rpm? Having the car tuned IMO is part of getting the whole car tuned, not just 4000-7500rpm
Originally Posted by Tuxevo
I agree with this entirely. A customer came to you to do a job and you failed to finish. He didn't ask for a partial tune and a turbo recommendation, did he? Perhaps he enjoys having a very usable power band and not needing to rev to the moon.

To the owner of the car, if you're reading this and would like some recomendations on tuners who can do the job without needing to sell you new parts, feel free to pm me.

You used to do good things Mellon. I hope this makes you want to get back to those old habits.

The tune is incomplete guys per the customers request. The car has a bad idle speed control servo so the customer wanted to call it a day until that's fixed. Once that's corrected we're going to correct the stalling and look into adjusting the knock sensor sensitivity in the problematic area.

However, the customer never intended on keeping it stock turbo, his plan was for something like the FP Black so he may wait until that's installed with the new ISC to re-tune it.

have a little more faith in us

Last edited by Mellon Racing; Sep 26, 2011 at 09:28 AM.
Old Sep 26, 2011, 10:39 AM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
PlanoEvo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: My House
Posts: 706
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Sounds good on the bigger turbo. My built motor needed adjustment on the knock tables as well. When he does go bigger can you post from 3000 up? Too many tuners or owners seem to not wanna show the lower part of the rpm band and probably so because they like to hide the fact that their monster hp cars are really laggy turds down low which make horrible street cars.
Old Sep 26, 2011, 10:52 AM
  #9  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yep, my 2.0 was setting off quite a bit of false knock at 3500-4500 areas where the exhaust is quite raspy once I put the header on especially. Being that I have an HTA86 it wasn't making squat for boost down there yet would shoot up to ~ 16 counts of knock randomly regarless of any amount of timing/fuel adjustments. But now it's relatively knock free there with some minor knock sensor tweaks.

we usually show 2500-8000 so that will be no problem going forward with Jon's next time around.
Old Sep 26, 2011, 11:31 AM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
project_skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Stock cams on a ported head, why???

Bet cams and ported 10.5 hotside would pick up a gang load of power.

I wait to see finished tune.
Old Sep 26, 2011, 11:46 AM
  #11  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Mellon Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Virginia
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
haha I know right, it's a wild setup. I think he blew the old motor and so this was a forced upgrade on a budget so it didn't get cams yet. I don't know if cams would help, the turbo is already out of steam as it is with the 2.4L. I'm not sure what he compression is but if it were high enough that might help the stock turbo make some pressure up top.
Old Sep 26, 2011, 12:42 PM
  #12  
Evolving Member
 
wrcRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Anchorage
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mellon Racing
we usually show 2500-8000 so that will be no problem going forward with Jon's next time around.
In my experience with Mellon we always tuned in this area of the RPM band. We still do (as soon as my car runs again LOL.)
Old Sep 26, 2011, 12:54 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
zeus1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: manchester, new hampshire
Posts: 1,002
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wrcRS
In my experience with Mellon we always tuned in this area of the RPM band. We still do (as soon as my car runs again LOL.)
2nd that
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gary@MellonRacing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
13
Oct 1, 2012 09:48 AM
Gary@MellonRacing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
189
Jul 16, 2012 11:29 PM
Gary@MellonRacing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
28
Dec 20, 2011 01:07 PM
Gary@MellonRacing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
22
Sep 8, 2011 07:51 PM
Gary@MellonRacing
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
13
May 14, 2011 04:59 AM



Quick Reply: Mellon Racing – Jon’s EVO 8 * 2.4 Liter Stock Evo 8 Turbo * on E85 @ 30Psi



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:52 PM.