Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Official "Pure" 91 octane evo thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2013 | 11:59 PM
  #136  
01sporty's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 151
Likes: 2
From: salt lake city utah
hx40 evo pump

This car is just insane in the build quality and the attention to detail. I was thoroughly impressed by the responsiveness of this turbo and the whole car. I don't understand why more people don't utilize these cheaper turbo options
this is 100% 91 octane and at 4800 ft above sea level in utah(slc) I was being conservative on his tune because he daily drives it and also track races too.

The car mod list to the best of my knowledge

2.3 stroker motor eagle rods. wiseco pistons
stock head
supertech springs
gsc s2 cams
880cc injectors
walbro 255 modded
jacks transmission trans and t case
EBB Fab top mount twinscroll kit
EBB Fab 3' aluminum intercooler piping
Holset hx-40 hybrid with borg warner compressor wheel
holset 12cm (.89 A/R housing t3)
twin mvs wastegates
ets garret core
stock intake manifold
stock tb
sparktech cop kit
stock 7 heat range plugs
this car has been lightend and had huge widebody kit and also on some knarly rpf-01 the weight is scaled weight with two people in the car and the pull was in third gear at 31psi tapering to 27 by redline
tires are 265/45/17
Attached Thumbnails Official "Pure" 91 octane evo thread-broderickevo-sae6.jpg   Official "Pure" 91 octane evo thread-bjevo.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2013 | 12:04 AM
  #137  
Lang55esan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: usa
Don't wait for everyone to come in here and repost all their dyno graphs.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 11:12 PM
  #138  
Sideck's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Calexico, CA
HTA86 @20 psi / 432 WHPS
100% 91 Oct...





Reply
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 04:32 AM
  #139  
HsamehH's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 4
From: EGYPT
can you post all your mods ?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 12:47 PM
  #140  
Sideck's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Calexico, CA
Originally Posted by HsamehH
can you post all your mods ?

sure,

Buschur 2.0 (10:1 compression)
HTA86 .82AR / 2.5" Vband
SDK Racing Head
* MAP In/Ex Valves Stock Size
* 3 angle valve job
SDK 4" CAI
GSC S3 Cams
GSC Valve Springs/Retainer/Seat Kit
ARP L19 Head Studs
MAP T3 Exhaust Manifold
Kiggly Racing - HLA Pressure Regulator
ARP L19 Headstud Kit
SDK 3" Downpipe
SDK 3" Full Exhaust
FB 70mm Throttle Body
JMFAB Drag Intake Manifold
Speed Density / Stock ECU
Omnibar 4 Bar Map Sensor
44mm Tial WGA
50mm Tial Bov
4.0" ETS Intercooler
Buschur Dual Fuel Pump
AMS Fuel Rail
SDK -6an Fuel Feed Line Kit (from the tank)
Stock Return Fuel Line
SDK Return Line Kit (Fuel Lab FPR)
PTE 1200cc Injectors
Spoolinup COP Kit
AEM Adjustable Cam Gears
Tilton Twindisk Clutch
dejon tool dual MBC
2 map switch


Race Gas Tune:

Q16 @38psi / 734 WHPS (we need bigger injectors for more boost)

Reply
Old Aug 20, 2013 | 03:34 AM
  #141  
HsamehH's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 199
Likes: 4
From: EGYPT
awesome results,it seems the HTA3586 works pretty well over 20+ psi
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2013 | 03:43 PM
  #142  
blackoutVIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 253
Likes: 4
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by blackoutVIII
With my mods, I was tuned on a mustang dyno 264whp and 282tq on 91 octane. When I was on 93 Octane my numbers were 334whp and 352tq (tuned by Mellon). Going from 93 to 91 octane I lost about 20% power. Is this normal?

91Octane fuel , I am in Az.
93 Octane, I was in Texas.

If this makes a difference.
Any takers on this? My VD also calculated 260ish WHP and 260ish torque.

I am waiting to recieve my CAMS (Backorder Sep time frame) to instal and re-tune.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2013 | 05:21 PM
  #143  
Sideck's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Calexico, CA
is 100% normal, you can run more boost on 93...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2013 | 03:39 PM
  #144  
weaselandahalf's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: United States
Mods:
UICP/LICP
Intake
TBE including 02 housing
Evo 9 Turbo
Walbro 255
ECU Boost Control
Tuned by me @ ~25psi (this was one of the earlier runs that I did so the boost is not as consistent in the midrange, but it is better now)

Name:  342hp.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  54.6 KB

I think 342 is a little high because there is a little upward then downward slant at the end of my road that makes VD show less power (around 6,200), and then a little more at the end. I doubt I will keep the car at 25psi for long, though.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2013 | 04:44 PM
  #145  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by weaselandahalf
Mods:
UICP/LICP
Intake
TBE including 02 housing
Evo 9 Turbo
Walbro 255
ECU Boost Control
Tuned by me @ ~25psi (this was one of the earlier runs that I did so the boost is not as consistent in the midrange, but it is better now)

I think 342 is a little high because there is a little upward then downward slant at the end of my road that makes VD show less power (around 6,200), and then a little more at the end. I doubt I will keep the car at 25psi for long, though.
that is very high. with the same mods as you, on a IX, with 264 cams, i only managed 334whp.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2013 | 07:46 PM
  #146  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by weaselandahalf
Mods:
UICP/LICP
Intake
TBE including 02 housing
Evo 9 Turbo
Walbro 255
ECU Boost Control
Tuned by me @ ~25psi (this was one of the earlier runs that I did so the boost is not as consistent in the midrange, but it is better now)



I think 342 is a little high because there is a little upward then downward slant at the end of my road that makes VD show less power (around 6,200), and then a little more at the end. I doubt I will keep the car at 25psi for long, though.
Do multiple pulls and look for consistent results, not one-time flukes.

Last edited by Boosted Tuning; Oct 12, 2013 at 07:51 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2013 | 09:01 PM
  #147  
weaselandahalf's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: United States
Originally Posted by Boosted Tuning
Do multiple pulls and look for consistent results, not one-time flukes.
I read the sticky! Lol...I get consistent results, I have probably done over 100 pulls on this same road lol. While I was pretty much done tuning for 25psi, the VD always showed within 5 or so hp of 340, but does having a downhill at the end of the road I test on make VD think the car has more power than it actually does?
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2013 | 10:49 PM
  #148  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by weaselandahalf
I read the sticky! Lol...I get consistent results, I have probably done over 100 pulls on this same road lol. While I was pretty much done tuning for 25psi, the VD always showed within 5 or so hp of 340, but does having a downhill at the end of the road I test on make VD think the car has more power than it actually does?
yes. hp is figured by using rpm and time. rpm rising in less time = more power.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2013 | 08:23 AM
  #149  
weaselandahalf's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: United States
Originally Posted by kaj
yes. hp is figured by using rpm and time. rpm rising in less time = more power.
Yeah, thats what I figured. It makes sense on the graph too because the power dips slightly when i would be on the uphill and then rises slightly on the downhill. It's more noticeable with less smoothing too. Thanks!
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2013 | 12:43 PM
  #150  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by weaselandahalf
Yeah, thats what I figured. It makes sense on the graph too because the power dips slightly when i would be on the uphill and then rises slightly on the downhill. It's more noticeable with less smoothing too. Thanks!
just for fun, do a run downhill. the graph is awesome. LOL
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:20 AM.