Boost_Inspired

iTrader: (37)

Your numbers are fine bro , BR dyno is called a heartbreaker for a reason. On a dynojet it should pull 360ish. Go get some track times and be surprised.

BlackOpsEvo

My evo 9 made 285 on 91 at RRE. 365 on e85 with just...

Drop in filter
GM 3 port
TBE w/HFC
Walbro 255
RC 1200s

That was on a dyne pack.

GTijoejoe

iTrader: (25)

I only have experience with one specific dynapack, and that one read really high. My buddy's stock STI laid down 275hp on it

To me its ok, pulls decent... I'd consider it quick, not fast by any means but its not like I was expecting ithat on a stock turbo. When you're use to being in 450-600hp cars a 350hp car is kinda numb.
After driving it for a few days my boost kinda varies... 25-28, so who knows what the next pull might bring lol


I plan to see at the very least what it will trap, its not like I've had that opportunity in the past few days

bbyevo8u

iTrader: (14)

i know you heard it already but the numbers are about rite, maybe a little low but there could be many reasons why your car is off 10whp from a guy that has the same mods as you even on the same dyno same day, not every car is the same lol...

i dont even see a MBC on your list, you have basic mods and your making basic power from them


next tune you want to put these mods on- fuel pump up grade, mbc, bigger injectors and ditch the stock turbo and maybe throw some cams in there! i promise you will be happy, your half way there..

BlackOpsEvo

The RRE dyne pack reads lower than a dyno jet and higher than a mustang dyno.

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

Looks right to me.

348 on stock cams in the temps and humidity y'all have right now is about normal. Remember the 10-80-10 rule. 10% of Evos make sub standard power for the mods, 80% are the same as all the rest, and the last 10% are factory freaks. The most I have done on stock cams and turbo that wasnt a factor of cold temps is 367whp at 27psi on 92 octane. I have one do 377whp but it was also a 18* day.

Aaron

GTijoejoe

iTrader: (25)

Oops, I'll fix that, certainly I have a MBC, how do you think we got to 28psi?
I did mention that we used a BR mbc, its just not listed... but did you not read everything? cause I certainly did post a upgraded fuel pump and injectors

Cool, thanks for your input... so the general consensus is I'm in the 80%
and just to be 100% clear, I was not by any means looking down on David's tuning, I was more curious if my motor was in the lower 10% range

Thanks for the all responses!

bbyevo8u

iTrader: (14)

first off there are more ways to raise the boost then a mbc lol.. dont get snotty with me cause i didnt see that you posted a mbc and fuel pump, i really dont know what you expect from your bolt on's? maybe you need to do more research before posting stupid threads!

bbyevo8u

iTrader: (14)

i was just trying to help!

tony_b

iTrader: (31)

I forgot to put my numbers from when I was at Buschurs in 07. With a 3" turbo back, cone filter and a "bro tune" (remember this was in '07!! lol)... I put down 279. Aside of what I listed, the car was a BONE STOCK EvoIX. I didn't even have an MBC yet. Hopefully, I can get another tune at DTT before the shootout and compare the 2 Mustang dynos.

GTijoejoe

iTrader: (25)

sorry man, wasn't being snotty, if you reread my original post you may understand why I didn't think you read the entire thing.

Black94TSi

iTrader: (2)

I also forgot to add that I recently took the car to the track and ran a 12.6 at 109 with it. Track was slippery and was only able to cut 1.89 sixty foots.

brenner

iTrader: (14)

those look like good numbers for Davids dyno.

drive it and enjoy it!

sliqdaddy91

iTrader: (2)

better sixty foot and ull be around 110-111 traps, so those numbers seem just about on par.