Evo 9 - Big power on 93oct from an ETS Twinscroll 6266 turbokit
#46
A) I posted that before DynoDynamics sheet was posted. (You also must remember that Dyno Dynamics, just like Mustang Dynos, can be skewed by about a million different correction factors, so saying they are an exact percentage different isn't the most accurate thing to say).
B) The 620whp was made @29psi
Good pump gas numbers on this turbo regardless!
B) The 620whp was made @29psi
Good pump gas numbers on this turbo regardless!
This car made 592WHP dynojet vd at 37psi at higher RPM. (peak power uptop)
You know from reading the first post i had no control over the boost curve. Once we drop boost i'll share another result with less boost and we will go from there. ill overlay the results also just for comparison for others.
this vehicle is still on a lot of stock ported parts. also just kelford 272 which leave a lot on the table as we both know.
I think the dyno dynamics was setup to read like a dynojet 100% yes. if not, id be surprised. They are on facebook, i will send them a message and find out. I will update with what they say.
Last edited by tscompusa; Jun 1, 2013 at 05:45 PM.
#49
Good stuff. That is one hell of a vacuum/boost leak. If it was run off the intake manifold you would have known right away since the car probably wouldn't idle. However running off the compressor housing on SD you would never know.
#51
Having email issues with getting Tom logs but should have updated numbers soon.
#52
I got a chance to speak with Fastech today. Their dyno is calibrated to read exactly like the local dynojet near them. That is what i figured, but i just wanted to update the thread and let others know.
His laptop broke so after thats fixed i will tune it at a more sane boost level and share the end final result.
His laptop broke so after thats fixed i will tune it at a more sane boost level and share the end final result.
#54
I didn't have the wastegate holes plugged. Plugged them up and it's fine, hitting 30s. But now I'm having issues with the valve seals so the tuning is on hold.
#55
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thinking of picking up a Twinscroll T4 6266 turbokit with a smaller .84 a/r housing. How much quicker will spool up be on a stock 2.0l with GSC s3's and bpu's? Will try to extract as much power on the my stock block before I build a 2.3lr Awesome numbers btw!!!
#58
I am using the 6466 with ETS exhaust manifold with Motec. My car at 1.6 bar feels quicker than when I boost at 2.1 bar. I am using 44mm Tial wastegates.
Are my springs too soft that it would not allow me to boost properly at 2.1 bar ?
Thanks
Are my springs too soft that it would not allow me to boost properly at 2.1 bar ?
Thanks
#59
After he capped them off everything was ok. so the spring pressure was not the issue.
The only thing that would make the car feeler quicker with less boost then higher boost is the tune. maybe its going to lean? maybe its pulling timing? maybe it has a boost leak and you're just heating the air up and not getting anything into the engine efficiently?
Those are some things you can look into. i would keep the boost turned down for now based on what you just said.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
39
Nov 11, 2013 09:07 AM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
18
Jul 19, 2013 04:22 AM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
19
Jun 20, 2013 01:11 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
55
Apr 14, 2013 06:48 PM