Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Daniel's PTE 6870 TEASER 807whp and plenty to go

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2015, 12:09 PM
  #16  
Evolving Member
 
R. Mutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 264
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I thought this car was 2.2SLR with a TS 6466 on AEM v2 w/ Flex Fuel...or is that another Daniel?
Old Jan 8, 2015, 12:25 PM
  #17  
Evolved Member
 
MrLith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Welly NZ
Posts: 715
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by norcalSRTrida
I'm not hating either. I love any/all work from ER. I was just asking some questions from those of us that may have questions of whether there's any real value in switching from a different 67mm to the 6870, if it will be ran in the 36-low 40psi range.
Fair point - we probably can't read too much into it until it's fully tuned, hopefully they do it again at that 36-40psi range but considering VE is only partly affected by the turbo there may be a point where the gains from a better turbine may become insignificant... but if this spools better than another turbo which otherwise allows similar power in that 36-40psi range surely it still makes the 6870 a definite upgrade still? Also leaves room for more if focus changes and they decide 50+psi is a good idea in future
Old Jan 8, 2015, 01:29 PM
  #18  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by Maddball
JB, what's the timing up top with 34PSI if you don't mind me asking? This will be interesting to see the overlay of the 6870 and 3794. The new vs the old.
It is only at 11* right now versus the 15-16* of the 3794.
Old Jan 8, 2015, 01:36 PM
  #19  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by droppinbottom
Glad to see the OG 2.2 is still kicking but. Seems everyone is stepping up the game for 2015.

Was this pull done in 4th?
Yes this was in 4th

Originally Posted by norcalSRTrida
It's not like the turbine wheel on the 3794 is from anything of recent years, iirc?
We already have seen how a gen2 compressor wheel on the PTE is worth 30-40hp over the same exact sized gen1 wheel. Then add in im assuming the new technology and r&d of the 70mm, and its not making a good bit more power at a respectable 40psi?

Again, reread what I posted, in particular the last few sentences.


I'm not hating either. I love any/all work from ER. I was just asking some questions from those of us that may have questions of whether there's any real value in switching from a different 67mm to the 6870, if it will be ran in the 36-low 40psi range.
See my last post, this isnt the same car. I have also included 2 sheets to overlay the boost so you can see the difference. Your numbers arent really exactly comparable dyno to dyno.

Originally Posted by R. Mutt
I thought this car was 2.2SLR with a TS 6466 on AEM v2 w/ Flex Fuel...or is that another Daniel?
Different Daniel, actually he posted above....DroppinBottom

Originally Posted by MrLith
Fair point - we probably can't read too much into it until it's fully tuned, hopefully they do it again at that 36-40psi range but considering VE is only partly affected by the turbo there may be a point where the gains from a better turbine may become insignificant... but if this spools better than another turbo which otherwise allows similar power in that 36-40psi range surely it still makes the 6870 a definite upgrade still? Also leaves room for more if focus changes and they decide 50+psi is a good idea in future
Boost to boost out the top -

Name:  6870vs3794boosttoboostoutthetop_zps50d1e3f0.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  115.7 KB

Boost to boost down low -

Name:  6870vs3794boosttoboostdownlow_zps6a8a0bcf.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  103.9 KB

4 more psi to make the same power and running 4* more? This should be pretty easy to call.
Old Jan 8, 2015, 01:44 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
 
MrLith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Welly NZ
Posts: 715
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
There it is Awesome, thanks for sharing! They've done a great job with this turbo, will be interesting to see how it goes once you start leaning on it.
Old Jan 9, 2015, 09:14 PM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
jmcmill3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Subd
Old Jan 10, 2015, 03:45 PM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
mitsubeastlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
this spool so nice...
Old Jan 10, 2015, 05:45 PM
  #23  
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
topendusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NC
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking good guys.
Old Jan 11, 2015, 03:24 AM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
way2qik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: With my admirers in the BACK ROOM!
Posts: 651
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Aaron, how do you see this turbo stacking up against the FP Super99?
Old Jan 11, 2015, 10:50 AM
  #25  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
tscompusa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 10,299
Received 67 Likes on 59 Posts
Awesome setup! Very efficient car!
Old Jan 11, 2015, 03:31 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
mitsubeastlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by way2qik
Aaron, how do you see this turbo stacking up against the FP Super99?
interested as well
Old Jan 11, 2015, 04:59 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
 
MrLith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Welly NZ
Posts: 715
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
I'd be leaning towards the Super 99 being laggier and making more power "on kill" though possibly needing more boost to do it, but that's just a guess.
Old Jan 11, 2015, 10:17 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by MrLith
I'd be leaning towards the Super 99 being laggier and making more power "on kill" though possibly needing more boost to do it, but that's just a guess.
Yes, seemingly a lot more boost.
Old Jan 12, 2015, 09:38 AM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
R/TErnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WAR EAGLE!
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I guess this isn't really surprising given the turbine wheel diameter? Helps the pressure ratio the head is working with. I assume you're measuring back pressure Aaron? At 34psi of boost pressure, what is the pre-turbine pressure?

Thank you for sharing as always
Old Jan 12, 2015, 01:28 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
I guess this isn't really surprising given the turbine wheel diameter? Helps the pressure ratio the head is working with. I assume you're measuring back pressure Aaron? At 34psi of boost pressure, what is the pre-turbine pressure?

Thank you for sharing as always
I will have to see if we have data. I dont believe this car has backpressure on it yet as the owner was deployed when we started making that a little more standard with the standalone and 800+whp builds.


Quick Reply: Daniel's PTE 6870 TEASER 807whp and plenty to go



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:31 PM.