Evo IX 2.0 Mamba Turbo GTX3584R + water/meth. injection
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Evo IX 2.0 Mamba Turbo GTX3584R + water/meth. injection
2.0
ETS T4 ts. manifold
Mamba Turbo GTX3584R a/r 0.70 with T4 ts. a/r 1.06 housing
Kelford TX280 cams
AEM v.2 w/meth. kit
Speed Density on stock ECU.
DynoJet on Virtual dyno on 3rd gear:
Comparison with Garret GTX3582 with same boost (about 2.7 bar) :
With the same spool and response , Mamba give minimum +50whp from Garret
ETS T4 ts. manifold
Mamba Turbo GTX3584R a/r 0.70 with T4 ts. a/r 1.06 housing
Kelford TX280 cams
AEM v.2 w/meth. kit
Speed Density on stock ECU.
DynoJet on Virtual dyno on 3rd gear:
Comparison with Garret GTX3582 with same boost (about 2.7 bar) :
With the same spool and response , Mamba give minimum +50whp from Garret
#4
Evolving Member
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
I use my ATP housing T4 twin 1.06.
Mamba don't have twin now.
Full boost the same of Garret GTX3582 ! Its depends from boost pik and gear you drive., about 5000rpm.
I am happy now.
The cars go 100-200 km/h in 5.2 sec, and its not final tune.
On Garret it was 5.5 sec.
Mamba don't have twin now.
Full boost the same of Garret GTX3582 ! Its depends from boost pik and gear you drive., about 5000rpm.
I am happy now.
The cars go 100-200 km/h in 5.2 sec, and its not final tune.
On Garret it was 5.5 sec.
#6
Evolving Member
Oh so the Garrett housing will bolt to this nice. If u get some numbers on pump only post them up with the boost log.
Trending Topics
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
#9
Wow! Congratulations on the numbers
I see that you are running rich on meth especially. I have been running at 11.8 and that is a safe AFR. Any reason for this?
If I didn't hate lag this would be my next upgrade for sure
I see that you are running rich on meth especially. I have been running at 11.8 and that is a safe AFR. Any reason for this?
If I didn't hate lag this would be my next upgrade for sure