Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Data on internal vs external WG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2017 | 04:21 PM
  #76  
RS200's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 622
Likes: 118
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
I'm surprised how little exposure the test I posted last page is getting. That's the only instance of a SS vs TS comparison I've ever seen on a 4G63, and it's being pretty well glossed over (I guess the "debate" didn't help things..)
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2017 | 07:16 PM
  #77  
Jaraxle's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 261
From: New York
From some tech articles I have gathered twin scroll is the bomb, and has literally no losses. There is an interesting post on the mazda forums, with data from mazda on twin scroll versus single (it is old, but science is science):

http://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-...turbos-903210/

According to Geoff at Full Race:
"We have found the twin-scroll systems have higher backpressure at low rpm (which is good for turbo spool-up) and lower backpressure at high rpm (which is good for top-end performance). On the other hand, single-scroll systems have lower backpressure at low rpm (bad for spool-up) and higher backpressure at high rpm (which hurts top-end performance)."

~Jaraxle
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 01:04 AM
  #78  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by RS200
I'm surprised how little exposure the test I posted last page is getting. That's the only instance of a SS vs TS comparison I've ever seen on a 4G63, and it's being pretty well glossed over (I guess the "debate" didn't help things..)
It only reinforced what I've been saying lol
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 12:32 PM
  #79  
Evo8cy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 563
Likes: 40
From: Cyprus
Originally Posted by Jaraxle
From some tech articles I have gathered twin scroll is the bomb, and has literally no losses. There is an interesting post on the mazda forums, with data from mazda on twin scroll versus single (it is old, but science is science):

http://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-...turbos-903210/

According to Geoff at Full Race:
"We have found the twin-scroll systems have higher backpressure at low rpm (which is good for turbo spool-up) and lower backpressure at high rpm (which is good for top-end performance). On the other hand, single-scroll systems have lower backpressure at low rpm (bad for spool-up) and higher backpressure at high rpm (which hurts top-end performance)."
~Jaraxle







I have read many articles either "tech" or opinionated, started with books and magazines and proceeded with the internet about 20 years ago, and there was nothing convincing enough to assure me things were as such. So I started experimenting with both types of housings through the years on various setups, and the results were not as such as the ones described in the above or other articles, in fact I came to the conclusion and consideration through the results I had, that both types differ so very little from each other which is not worth taking into consideration, that both types can yield the same results if setup right, and certainly nothing as the comment geoff made. To me the only actual factor that really matters, is the a/r and cm2 area of a housing.



My personal opinion derives from my personal experiences and testing, and to me that is both a catalyst and ultimate proof on the matter.












Marios
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 02:21 PM
  #80  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
You've never posted any of your "personal testing" and we have posted things that disprove what you say. So, yeah...
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 04:22 PM
  #81  
Evo8cy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 563
Likes: 40
From: Cyprus
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
You've never posted any of your "personal testing" and we have posted things that disprove what you say. So, yeah...



If you do not like my posts and consider them not worth reading, do not read them nor bother yourself with them. You've posted nothing that disproves what my testing has shown me, there can't be anything that disproves reality.



Believe whatever you wish to believe, it makes no difference to me.












Marios

Last edited by Evo8cy; Mar 19, 2017 at 05:35 PM. Reason: typo
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2017 | 09:33 PM
  #82  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
It's not what I "believe". It's the hard evidence in front me.
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2017 | 04:00 AM
  #83  
Evo8cy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 563
Likes: 40
From: Cyprus
That's no hard evidence by far in my eyes lol, but as I said you can believe whatever you want.










Marios
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2017 | 06:57 AM
  #84  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by RS200
Attached.
RS200 posted a great article, in this thread...lol
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2017 | 05:07 PM
  #85  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Originally Posted by Evo8cy

Also in WRC and IIRC, most teams use single scroll turbos AND ANTI-LAG, such as Citroen, Hyundai , Toyota.


If single scroll was considered less efficient and inferior in any way than twin scroll then it would have become obsolete since the group B monster era where the single was still used by most teams, EXCEPT THE MOST POWERFUL I4 ENGINES FROM THE ERA...BMW...AND RENAULT. BUT I MEAN, 1500HP ON QUALIFYING RUNS IS NO BIG DEAL..


Marios
You are missing some key aspects in your argument.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2017 | 10:14 AM
  #86  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
This looks twin scroll to me...lol


Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 09:28 AM
  #87  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
It also looks surprisingly similar to the EFRs that were to come 30 years later....some connection between the two? Lol.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 09:36 AM
  #88  
Klaiceps's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 508
Likes: 28
From: Honolulu, HI
Is he on timeout again or has he been given the ban hammer?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 09:45 PM
  #89  
RightSaid fred's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 714
Likes: 22
From: in a garage
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
I didn't say diesel's with an integrated mani, I said diesels, and the newer cars that have an integrated mani. If you can't see why turbo discussion doesn't crossover from gas to diesel, I'm not sure we can continue talking about this.


If you meant the diesel panamera, you should have specified. And while the diesel doesn't use twin scroll, it does use VGT technology as of 2017.

I've been having a play with a Detroit series 60 of 1999 vintage.
Twin scroll Garrett AND VGT. 500 horses or thereabouts at about 2000 RPM from 12.7 litres.

edit, not VGT but twin internal WG

Last edited by RightSaid fred; Mar 24, 2017 at 04:46 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 12:35 AM
  #90  
kikiturbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 318
From: Croatia
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
This looks twin scroll to me...lol


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDWA_4wpobc
I love the extra throttle body before turbo that BMW and renault used in the 80's to combat lag..
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:56 AM.