Data on internal vs external WG
I'm surprised how little exposure the test I posted last page is getting. That's the only instance of a SS vs TS comparison I've ever seen on a 4G63, and it's being pretty well glossed over (I guess the "debate" didn't help things..)
From some tech articles I have gathered twin scroll is the bomb, and has literally no losses. There is an interesting post on the mazda forums, with data from mazda on twin scroll versus single (it is old, but science is science):
http://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-...turbos-903210/
According to Geoff at Full Race:
"We have found the twin-scroll systems have higher backpressure at low rpm (which is good for turbo spool-up) and lower backpressure at high rpm (which is good for top-end performance). On the other hand, single-scroll systems have lower backpressure at low rpm (bad for spool-up) and higher backpressure at high rpm (which hurts top-end performance)."
~Jaraxle
http://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-...turbos-903210/
According to Geoff at Full Race:
"We have found the twin-scroll systems have higher backpressure at low rpm (which is good for turbo spool-up) and lower backpressure at high rpm (which is good for top-end performance). On the other hand, single-scroll systems have lower backpressure at low rpm (bad for spool-up) and higher backpressure at high rpm (which hurts top-end performance)."
~Jaraxle
Originally Posted by RS200
I'm surprised how little exposure the test I posted last page is getting. That's the only instance of a SS vs TS comparison I've ever seen on a 4G63, and it's being pretty well glossed over (I guess the "debate" didn't help things..)
From some tech articles I have gathered twin scroll is the bomb, and has literally no losses. There is an interesting post on the mazda forums, with data from mazda on twin scroll versus single (it is old, but science is science):
http://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-...turbos-903210/
According to Geoff at Full Race:
"We have found the twin-scroll systems have higher backpressure at low rpm (which is good for turbo spool-up) and lower backpressure at high rpm (which is good for top-end performance). On the other hand, single-scroll systems have lower backpressure at low rpm (bad for spool-up) and higher backpressure at high rpm (which hurts top-end performance)."
~Jaraxle
http://www.rx7club.com/single-turbo-...turbos-903210/
According to Geoff at Full Race:
"We have found the twin-scroll systems have higher backpressure at low rpm (which is good for turbo spool-up) and lower backpressure at high rpm (which is good for top-end performance). On the other hand, single-scroll systems have lower backpressure at low rpm (bad for spool-up) and higher backpressure at high rpm (which hurts top-end performance)."
~Jaraxle
I have read many articles either "tech" or opinionated, started with books and magazines and proceeded with the internet about 20 years ago, and there was nothing convincing enough to assure me things were as such. So I started experimenting with both types of housings through the years on various setups, and the results were not as such as the ones described in the above or other articles, in fact I came to the conclusion and consideration through the results I had, that both types differ so very little from each other which is not worth taking into consideration, that both types can yield the same results if setup right, and certainly nothing as the comment geoff made. To me the only actual factor that really matters, is the a/r and cm2 area of a housing.
My personal opinion derives from my personal experiences and testing, and to me that is both a catalyst and ultimate proof on the matter.
Marios
If you do not like my posts and consider them not worth reading, do not read them nor bother yourself with them. You've posted nothing that disproves what my testing has shown me, there can't be anything that disproves reality.
Believe whatever you wish to believe, it makes no difference to me.
Marios
Last edited by Evo8cy; Mar 19, 2017 at 05:35 PM. Reason: typo
Also in WRC and IIRC, most teams use single scroll turbos AND ANTI-LAG, such as Citroen, Hyundai , Toyota.
If single scroll was considered less efficient and inferior in any way than twin scroll then it would have become obsolete since the group B monster era where the single was still used by most teams, EXCEPT THE MOST POWERFUL I4 ENGINES FROM THE ERA...BMW...AND RENAULT. BUT I MEAN, 1500HP ON QUALIFYING RUNS IS NO BIG DEAL..
Marios
I didn't say diesel's with an integrated mani, I said diesels, and the newer cars that have an integrated mani. If you can't see why turbo discussion doesn't crossover from gas to diesel, I'm not sure we can continue talking about this.
If you meant the diesel panamera, you should have specified. And while the diesel doesn't use twin scroll, it does use VGT technology as of 2017.
If you meant the diesel panamera, you should have specified. And while the diesel doesn't use twin scroll, it does use VGT technology as of 2017.
I've been having a play with a Detroit series 60 of 1999 vintage.
Twin scroll Garrett AND VGT. 500 horses or thereabouts at about 2000 RPM from 12.7 litres.
edit, not VGT but twin internal WG
Last edited by RightSaid fred; Mar 24, 2017 at 04:46 AM.








