Evo 8 Stock block FP black - 402 HP 318 TQ - 29 psi - Buschur Tuned
Apr 11, 2017, 09:22 AM
#18
I'm very curious about the VD as well. Trying to get one this weekend
Apr 12, 2017, 05:38 AM
#19
Buschur has explained time and time again that it is setup exactly the way Mustang set it up to begin with, what difference does it make to you what numbers it puts out anyway? I've seen a local mustang dyno read higher than any dynojet. A dyno is a tool, plain and simple. It works as intended.
Apr 12, 2017, 05:46 AM
#20
I didn't get it dyno'd, I got it tuned. Obviously you use a dyno to measure gains in horsepower. It doesn't matter how a dyno compares to another, it is a tuning tool. Comparing one cars numbers made on one dyno, to another cars numbers at a different dyno on a different day, is really not a good comparison. Same dyno same day, trap speed, or 40 rolls will compare power
Apr 12, 2017, 07:39 AM
#22
EvoM Community Team Leader
the only paper that matters is the time slip. That being said a dyno graph is useful in evaluating how the car will behave. The highest numbers aren't terribly important, but the shape of the curve and the area below it will give a good indicator of what to expect.
Apr 12, 2017, 07:45 AM
#23
Lol really dude? Everything that's done to my car was done by me. Every single performance part on it was bought and paid for and installed by me. I even did the tephramods by myself, and tuned my 20G map and it worked well enough to get me 12.33. BUT, I'm not a tuner. You know who is? David Buschur. Which is why I trusted him to make some power with it and keep the block in one piece. You're coming off as the reason Every one thinks Evo owners are *******s
Apr 12, 2017, 07:53 AM
#25
Lancerrally45
You sure have a lot of free time to make a lot of comments and even "correct" continuously OP, yet you did not even "know" Buschur Mustang reads, is calibrated, to standard MD - not DJ or other.
Please, don't feel obligated to rebuttal my comment, have last word: let it go.
OP, great numbers for stock frame on pump fuel. To get more power on pump fuel it takes large full frame turbo to lower backpressure to allow more timing, and costs considerably more.
Given you use FP Black, I sense this is long term view to 2.3, as FP Red would have resulted in similar result with more street friendly spool.
Enjoy.
You sure have a lot of free time to make a lot of comments and even "correct" continuously OP, yet you did not even "know" Buschur Mustang reads, is calibrated, to standard MD - not DJ or other.
Please, don't feel obligated to rebuttal my comment, have last word: let it go.
OP, great numbers for stock frame on pump fuel. To get more power on pump fuel it takes large full frame turbo to lower backpressure to allow more timing, and costs considerably more.
Given you use FP Black, I sense this is long term view to 2.3, as FP Red would have resulted in similar result with more street friendly spool.
Enjoy.
Apr 12, 2017, 07:57 AM
#26
Lol really dude? Everything that's done to my car was done by me. Every single performance part on it was bought and paid for and installed by me. I even did the tephramods by myself, and tuned my 20G map and it worked well enough to get me 12.33. BUT, I'm not a tuner. You know who is? David Buschur. Which is why I trusted him to make some power with it and keep the block in one piece. You're coming off as the reason Every one thinks Evo owners are *******s
Apr 12, 2017, 08:05 AM
#28
EvoM Community Team Leader
yah because everyone owns a machine shop right, engine assembly is not the same as engine blueprinting. It makes perfect sense to outsource short block machining to a shop with the proper facilities. I know how to blueprint an engine, and its for that reason I would research and pay a good shop to do it for me.
Apr 12, 2017, 09:29 AM
#29
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
Respectabel numbers man. I'm sure the car is a blast. No reason to try beating the bearings out of it for another 30hp on pump gas. Throw it on a dynojet and it probably makes around 450ish.
Now, put it on some E and let it eat
Now, put it on some E and let it eat
Apr 12, 2017, 10:03 AM
#30
Lancerrally45
You sure have a lot of free time to make a lot of comments and even "correct" continuously OP, yet you did not even "know" Buschur Mustang reads, is calibrated, to standard MD - not DJ or other.
Please, don't feel obligated to rebuttal my comment, have last word: let it go.
OP, great numbers for stock frame on pump fuel. To get more power on pump fuel it takes large full frame turbo to lower backpressure to allow more timing, and costs considerably more.
Given you use FP Black, I sense this is long term view to 2.3, as FP Red would have resulted in similar result with more street friendly spool.
Enjoy.
You sure have a lot of free time to make a lot of comments and even "correct" continuously OP, yet you did not even "know" Buschur Mustang reads, is calibrated, to standard MD - not DJ or other.
Please, don't feel obligated to rebuttal my comment, have last word: let it go.
OP, great numbers for stock frame on pump fuel. To get more power on pump fuel it takes large full frame turbo to lower backpressure to allow more timing, and costs considerably more.
Given you use FP Black, I sense this is long term view to 2.3, as FP Red would have resulted in similar result with more street friendly spool.
Enjoy.
Thank you, I appreciate it! It really is fun to drive now, it was before but now it sounds awesome and doesn't stop pulling until redline. And exactly on the beating it up for no reason. I told Dave to keep going to whatever he feels comfortable to. I didn't realize the limits of 93 were so easily attained. I have gone back and forth about switching to E85 but I don't have any local stations that have it, so for now I'm stuck with 93