Stepping my IX up for 91/E85, looking for final preparation suggestions
#243
Evolved Member
These are good results, and these FIC ball and seat injectors seem to perform, are consistent and retain a pulse width which is easily tunable. The reason you are seeing 1400cc/m instead of 1650cc/m is the fact that these are tested at their 80% duty cycle with base pressure at 43,5psi, which indicates that at 100% of duty cycle they give out 1730cc/m. If they were at 1650cc/m they should've been at 1320cc/m at the specific base fuel pressure and 80% idc.
They should have also given you a dynamic flow test results besides the static one.
Marios
Last edited by Evo8cy; Apr 21, 2018 at 11:53 AM. Reason: added comment
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Apr 21, 2018)
#245
Evolved Member
No worries, glad to help out. They could have included the dynamic flow results on the same result sheet, but nevertheless these are good results.
Some additional info, you are pushing approximately 134lbs/h through these at 80% duty cycle, which is good for 800-850 crank hp depending on the dyno on 93 oct gasoline, or around 600-650 crank hp on e85 as methanol being a highly oxygenated fuel requires more fuel per pound of air to yield the same afr. Always on a properly prepared setup.
Marios
Some additional info, you are pushing approximately 134lbs/h through these at 80% duty cycle, which is good for 800-850 crank hp depending on the dyno on 93 oct gasoline, or around 600-650 crank hp on e85 as methanol being a highly oxygenated fuel requires more fuel per pound of air to yield the same afr. Always on a properly prepared setup.
Marios
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (Apr 21, 2018)
The following users liked this post:
2006EvoIXer (May 17, 2018)